International research projects on structural health monitoring: An overview

Structural Health Monitoring

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 341-358

  Van Der Auweraer, Herman ^a   Peeters, Bart ^a  

^a LMS INTERNATIONAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Collaborative research; Damage detection; Health monitoring

Indexed keywords

EID: 20344395005     PISSN: 14759217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/147592103039836     Document Type: Article

References (117)

1. SHM-2000: Structural Health Monitoring 2000, Fu-Kuo-Chang (ed.), Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Sept. 8-10, 1999, Technomic Publ., Stanford (CA).
2. SPIE-3995: Proc. Conf. on Nondestructive Evaluation of Highways, Utilities and Pipelines IV, Newport Beach (US), March 7-9, 2000, Vol. SPIE. 3995.
3. DAMAS-'99: Proc. DAMAS 1999, Trans Tech Publications Ltd, Dublin, Ireland, June 28-30, 1999, Key Engineering Materials Vol. 167-168.
4. F3-2000: Guemes, J.A. (ed.), Proc. European COST F3 Conf. on System Identification & Structural Health Monitoring, Madrid (E), Jun. 2000, Univ. Politecnica de Madrid, Spain.
5. EP 0845854, Mechanical Vibration Detector and Vibration Damping Controller, http://www.epo.org
6. WO 99/06826, Vibration Data Processor and Processing Method, http://www.epo.org.
7. WO 99/05486, Vibration Monitor System, http://www.-epo.org.
8. Natke, H.G. and Cempel, C. (1997). Modelaided diagnosis of mechanical systems, fundamentals, detection, localization, assessment, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
9. Housner, G.W., Bergman, L.A., Caughey, T.K., Chassiakos, A.G., Claus, R.O., Masri, S.F., Skelton, R.E., Soong, T.T., Spencer, B.F. and Yao, J.T.P. (Sept. 1997). Structural control: past, present and future. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 123(9), 897-971.
10. Doebling, S., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M. and Shevitz, D. (1999). Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics. Shock and Vibration Digest, 30(2), http://ext.lanl.gov/projects/ damage_id/
11. Friswell, M.J. and Penny, J.E.T. (1997). Is damage location using vibration measurements practical? Proc. DAMAS 1997 (pp. 351-362), June 30-July 2, Sheffield, UK.
12. Stubbs, N. (1994). Apparatus and method for damage detection. Patent US 5,327,358, The Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
13. O'Brien, E.W. and Ibbotson, A.R. (2001). Method and apparatus for detection of structural damage. Patent WO 01/94934, BAE Systems PLC, Farnborough, UK.
14. Duron, Z.H. (2001). Wave speed bridge damage detection method. Patent US 6, 257, 064, The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA, USA.
15. Prine, D.W. Problems associated with nondestructive evaluation of bridges. BIRL, Nothwestern Univ. Industrial Research Lab., http://ntl.bts.gov/
16. Aktan, A.E., Tsikos, C.J., Catbas, F.N., Grimmelsman, K. and Barrish, R. (2000). Challenges and opportunities in bridge health monitoring. SHM-2000, pp. 461-473.
17. Enright, M.P. and Frangopol, D.M. Reliability based lifetime maintenance of aging highway bridges. SPIE-3995, pp. 4-13.
18. Bridge Management Systems, Literature Review and Search by the Infrastructure Technology Institute at Northwestern University, http://ntl.bts.gov/
19. Derriso, M.M., Faas, P., Calcaterra, J., Barnes, J.H. and Sotomayer, W. (September 2001). Structural health monitoring applications for current and future aerospace vehicles. Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (pp. 3-11), Stanford CA.
20. Galea, S.C. and Baker, A.A. (December 2000). Smart structures approaches for health monitoring of aircraft structures. Proc. of SPIE Vol. 4235, Smart Materials and MEMS (pp. 4235-4239), Melbourne, Australia.
21. Ikegami, R. (2000). Structural health monitoring: assessment of aircraft customer needs. SHM-2000, pp. 12-23.
22. Boller, C. (2000). Ways and options for aircraft structural health management. F3-2000, pp. 71-82.
23. Hunt, S. and Hebden, I. (Sept. 1999). Eurofighter 2000 Structural health and usage monitoring: an integrated approach. Proc. 2nd Joint NASA/FAA/DOD Conference on Aging Aircraft.
24. Hunt, S.R. and Hebden, I.G. (2000). Validation of the eurofighter typhoon structural health and usage monitoring system. F3-2000, pp. 743-752.
25. Robeson, E. and Thompson, B. Tools for the 21-st Century: MH-47E SUMS. SHM-2000, pp. 179-189.
26. Farrar, C.R., Sohn, H. and Doebling, S.W. (2000). Structural health monitoring at Los Alamos. SHM-2000, pp. 317-327.
27. IEEE Std. 1451.2-1997, (1998). IEEE Standard for a Smart Transducer Interface for Sensors and Actuators - Transducer to Microprocessor Communication Protocols and Transducer Electronic Data Sheet (TEDS) Format. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York.
28. Strasser, E.G. (1998). A modular, wireless, damage monitoring system for structures. PhD Dissertation, Dept. of Civil Eng., Stanford Univ., Palo Alto (US).
29. Fuhr, P.L. (May 2000). Wireless interrogation of instrumented structures. In: Ansari, F. (ed.), Condition Monitoring of Materials and Structures, Engineering Mechanics Conf (EM2000) (pp. 148-163), Austin, Tx-US.
30. Lemke, J. A remote vibration monitoring system using wireless Internet data transfer. SPIE-3995, pp. 436-445.
31. Oshima, T., Rahman, M., Mikami, S., Yamazaki, T., Takada, N., Lesko, J. and Kriz, R. Application of smart materials and systems to long-term bridge-health monitoring. SPIE-3995, pp. 253-263.
32. Schwesinger, P., Bolle, G., Berndt, R. and Bolle, T. Supervised lifetime extension of endangered concrete structures by health monitoring. SPIE-3995, pp. 191-198.
33. Lloyd, G.L., Wang, M.L. and Singh, V. (May 2000). Observed variations of mode frequencies of a prestressed concrete bridge with temperature. In: Ansari, F. (ed.), Condition Monitoring of Materials and Structures, Engineering Mechanics Conf (EM2000) (pp. 179-189), Austin, Tx-US.
34. Farrar, C.R., Doebling, S.W., Cornwell, P.J. and Strasser, E.G. (1997). Variability of modal parameters measured on the alamosa canyon bridge. Proc. 15th IMAC (pp. 257-263), Orlando, FL.
35. Peeters, B. and Roeck, G. (February 2000). One year monitoring of the Z24-bridge: environmental influences versus damage events. Proc. IMAC 18 (pp. 1570-1576), San Antonio, US.
36. Peeters, B., Maeck, J. and De Roeck, G. (2000). Monitoring of the Z24 bridge: separating temperature effects from damage. F3-2000, pp. 377-386.
37. Todoroki, A., Shimamura, Y. and Inada, T. (2000). Plug and monitor system via ethernet with distributed sensors and ccd camera. SHM-2000, pp. 571-580.
38. Mita, A. Emerging needs in Japan for health monitoring technologies in civil and building structures. SHM-2000, pp. 56-67.
39. Yamamoto, Y., Mita, A. and Okada, K. (1998). Intranet-based remote monitoring system for construction site. Proc. Annual Meeting of the Archit. Inst. of Japan (pp. 417-418).
40. Rahman, M.S., Oshima, T., Mikami, S., Yamaaki, T. and Tamba, I. (2000). Diagnosis of aged bridge by using intelligent monitoring system. SHM-2000, pp. 484-493.
41. Foote, P.D. (2000). Structural health monitoring: Tales from Europe. SHM-2000, pp. 24-35.
42. CORDIS website general: http://www.cordis.lu/en/ home.html
43. CORDIS website for searching: http://dbs.cordis.lu/ search/en/simple/ EN_PROJ_simple.html
44. Fedele, P., Cafasso, G. and Lecce, L. (1996). A new technique for damage identification and health monitoring of structures using piezoelectric sensors and actuators. Proceedings of 7th Intern. Conf. on Adaptive Structures (pp. 232-242), 23-25 Sept., Rome, Italy.
45. Napolitano, L., Fedele, P., Viscardi, M., Lecce, L. (1998). Damage identification and location on a typical aeronautical structure. Proc. Nondestructive Evaluation of Aging Aircraft, Airports, and Aerospace Hardware II (pp. 100-106), Mar.31-Apr.2 1998, San Antonio, TX-US.
46. Staszewski, W.J., Biemans, C., Boiler, C. and Tomlinson, G.R. (2000). Impact damage detection in composite structures - recent advances. SHM-2000, pp. 754-763.
47. http://smart.ramboll.dk/smart_eu/index.htm
48. http://www.me.ic.ac.uk/dynamics/struct/AMADEUS/ amadeus.html
49. Alexiou, K. (2000). Accurate modelling and damage detection in high safety and cost structures (AMADEUS). F3-2000, pp. 667-675.
50. Zang, C. and Imregun, M. (2000). Structural damage detection via principal component analysis and artificial neural networks. F3-2000, pp. 157-167.
51. Lopez-Diez, J., Cuerno-Rejado, C, Luengo, P., Alexiou, K., Garcia de Paredes, S. and Torrealba, M. (2000). Error localisation in mass and stiffness distribution for finite element models of spacecraft structures. F3-2000, pp. 699-708.
52. Alexiou, K., Luengo, P., Zang, C. and Imregun, M. (2000). Two frequency domain criteria for test/analysis correlation and finite element model updating. F3-2000, pp. 731-740.
53. Peeters, B., De Roeck, G., Hermans, L., Wauters, T., Kramer, C, De Smet, C. (1998). Comparison of system identification methods using operational data of a bridge test. Proc. ISMA 23 (pp. 923-930), Sept. 16-18.
54. Krâmer, C., De Smet, C. and De Roeck, G. (Feb. 1999). Z24 damage detection tests. Proc. IMAC 17 (pp. 1023-1029), Orlando FL.
55. Abdel Wahab, M. and De Roeck, G. (1999). Damage detection in bridges using modal curvatures: application to a real damage scenario. J. Sound and Vibration, 226(2), 217-235.
56. Peeters, B., Maeck, J. and De Roeck, G. (2000). Excitation sources and system identification in civil engineering. F3-2000, pp. 341-352.
57. Peeters, B. System identification and damage detection in civil engineering. PhD thesis, K.U. Leuven, Civil Eng. Dept., http://www.bwk.kuleuven. ac.be/bwm/
58. Ventura, C. and Peeters, B. (2001). Session 23 on comparative study of vibration analysis techniques for bridge dynamic characteristics. Proc. IMAC 19, Kissimmee (pp. 829-869), Feb. 5-8.
59. Work Programme for RTD actions in support of competitive and sustainable growth, 1998-2002, Cordis refi: c_wp_200101, Dec. 2000; http://www.cordis.lu/ growth/src/library.htmlwp
60. BRIME website at TRL: http://www.trl.co.uk/brime
61. EUREKA website: http://www.eureka.be
62. Kirkham, C, Long, A., Taylor, O. and Isbell, C. Adaptive fusion devices for condition monitoring: an overview of the NEURAL-MAINE project. DAMAS-'99, pp. 197-204.
63. Taylor, O., Maclntyre, J., Isbell, C., Kirkham, C. and Long, A. (1999). Adaptive fusion devices for condition monitoring: local fusion systems of the NEURAL-MAINE project. DAMAS-'99, pp. 205-216.
64. Long, A., Isbell, C., Kirkham, C. and Taylor, O. (1999). Machine level diagnosis tools for condition monitoring: concentrator units of the NEURAL-MAINE project. DAMAS-'99, pp. 217-223.
65. Hermans, L. and Van der Auweraer, H. (1999). Modal testing and analysis of structures under operational conditions: industrial applications. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 13(2), 193-216.
66. Hermans, L., Van der Auweraer, H. and Mevel, L. (1999). Health monitoring and detection of a fatigue problem of a sports car. Proc. 17th IMAC, Feb. 8-11, Kissimee, FL-US.
67. Mevel, L., Hermans, L. and Van der Auweraer, H. (Nov. 1999). On the application of subspace-based fault detection methods to industrial structures. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 13(6), 823-838.
68. Abdelghani, M., Goursat, M. and Biolchini, T. (Nov. 1999). On-line modal monitoring of aircraft structures under unknown excitation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 13(6), 839-854.
69. Hermans, L., Brughmans, M., Van der Auweraer, H. and Mevel, L. (1999). Damage diagnosis in a concrete three-span bridge: a case study. SEM Annual Conference and Exposition, June 7-9, Cincinnati, OH-US.
70. Basseville, M., Abdelghani, M. and Benveniste, A. (Jan. 2000). Subspace-based fault detection algorithms for vibration monitoring. Automatica, 36(1), 101-109.
71. Uhl, T., Bochniak, W., Lisowski, W., Van der Auweraer, H., Hermans, L. and Maecki, J. (1998). Finite Element Model Updating Procedure and Its Applications for Helicopter Tail Boom. Proc. ISM A 23 (pp. 1193-1200), Leuven (B).
72. TRA-EFTC: http://www.tra-efct.com/
73. SAMCO network: http://www.samco.org/
74. SAMCO database: http://samco.jrc.it/
75. COST-F3: http://www.ulg.ac.be/ltas-vis/costB/ costf3.html
76. (Jun. 2000). In: Guemes, J.A. (ed.), Proc. European COST F3 Conf. on system Identification & Structural Health Monitoring, Vol. 2, Madrid (E), Univ. Politecnica de Madrid, Spain.
77. (Sept. 2001). In: M. Link, GhK, (ed.), Proc. European COST F3 Conf on Structural System Identification, Vol. 2, Kassel, Germany.
78. ESF: http://www.esf.org
79. Allen, G. and Jarman, R. (1999). Collaborative R&D: manufacturing's new tool, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
80. http://www.atp.nist.gov/atp/gen_info.htm
81. Marcus, S.J. (Sept. 1998). Consorting with the enemy, R&D wise, pp. 64-70, IEEE Spectrum.
82. Research and Technology Program 1996-2000: A Guide to FHWA's Research and Technology Program, http:// www.tfhrc.gov/, pp. 19-26.
83. National Bridge Inventory Data, Rep. No. FHWA-PD-96-001, Washington D.C., 1998.
84. Chase, S.B. and Washer, G. (1997). Non-Destructive evaluation for bridge management in the next century. Public Roads, 61(1), http://www.tfhrc.gov/ pubrds/ july97/ndejuly.htm
85. Bridges and Structures Related Research Overview: http://www.tfhrc.gov/ structur/structre.htm
86. NDEVC Non Destructive Evaluation Validation Centre of the Federal Highway Administration; http:// www.tfhrc.gov/hnr20/nde/home.htm
87. http://ntl.bts.gov/
88. http://www.eng.nsf.gov/cms
89. Liu, S.C. (2000). Natural Hazard Mitigation: Exploring the Technological Frontiers. SHM-2000, pp. 36-55.
90. Frosh, R.J. and Sozen, M. Charting for Discovery: A Research Program for Auto-adaptive Media in Civil Engineering Systems, Report No. CE-STR-99-2, Civil Engineering, Purdue University (US).
91. Chang, F.K. (1999). Built-in Diagnostics for Structural Health Monitoring, Meeting of the US-Japan Urban Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Research, March 19-20, Sonoma, CA-US.
92. NEES project: http://www.eng.nsf.gov/nees and also http://www.nees.org
93. Farrar, C.R., Doebling, S. and Duffey, T. (Apr. 1999). Vibration Based Damage Detection, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, Proc. SD2000 Workshop, Albuquerque.
94. http://ext.lanl.gov/projects/ncsd
95. Farrar, C.R., Cornwell, P.J., Doebling, S.W. and Prime, M.B. (July 2000). Structural Health Monitoring of the Alamosa Canyon and 1-40 Bridges, p. 164, Los Alamos Report LA-13635-MS.
96. Sohn, H., Farrar, C.R., Hunter, N. and Worden, K. (Jan. 2001). Applying the LANL Statistical Pattern Recognition Paradigm for Structural Health Monitoring to Data from a Surface-Effect Fast Patrol Boat, pp. 76, Los Alamos Report LA-13761-MS, also http://www.osti.gov/bridge/
97. Farrar, C.R., Sohn, H. and Doebling, S.W. (2000). Structural health monitoring at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Proc. COMADEM 2000 (pp. 317-327), Dec. 3-8, Houston, TX-US.
98. ASCE SHM Committee: http://wusceel.cive.wustl.edu/ asce.shm/
99. Dyke, S.J., Bernal, D., Beck, J.L. and Ventura, C. (September 2001). An experimental benchmark problem in structural health monitoring. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA, USA.
100. Pappa, R.S., Doebling, S.W. and Kholwad, T. D. (January 2000). On-Line Database of Vibration-Based Damage Detection Experiments, NASA/TM-2000-209840.
101. Catbas, F.N., Grimmelsman, K.A. and Aktan, A.E. Structural identification of the Commodore Barry Bridge. SPIE-3995, pp. 84-97.
102. Kulcu, E., Qui, X., Barrish, R.A. and Aktan, A.E. Information technology and data management issues for health monitoring of the Commodore Barry Bridge. SPIE-3995, pp. 98-111.
103. http://fibec.flight.wpafb.af.mil/fibec/afgrow.html
104. Pappa, R., James III, G. and Zimmerman, D. (Sept. 1997). Autonomous model identification of the space shuttle tail rudder. ASME Design Engineering Tech. Conf, DETC97/VIB-4250.
105. Thompson, P.D. (1993). Pontis bridge management system. Proc. Pacific Rim Trans Tech Conf (pp. 500-506), July 25-28, Seattle, ASCE.
106. Lipkus, S.E. (1993) NCHRP Project 12-28(2)A: Bridge management software. Proc. 5-th Int. Conf Computing and Building Engineering (ASCE) (pp. 1049-1056), June 7-9.
107. Takeda, N. (1998). Structural health monitoring towards development of smart materials and structures. J Japan Soc. of Mech. Eng., 101(959), 26-29 (in Japanese).
108. Ogishu, T., Nomura, M., Kikukawa, H. and Takeda, N. (2000). Development of health monitoring system using embedded sma foils in cfrp laminates. SHM-2000, pp. 317-326.
109. Otani, S., Hiraishi, H., Midorikawa, M., Teshigawara, M. and Saito, T. (2000). Development of smart systems for building structures http://sake.arch.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/otani/spie_00.pdf, presented at SPIE's Seventh Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, March 6-7, Newport Beach, California, Proc. of the SPIE, Vol. 3988, paper 3988-01.
110. Abe, M., Fujino, Y., Yanagihara, M. and Sato, M. Monitoring of hakucho suspension bridge by ambient vibration measurement. SPIE-3995, pp. 237-244.
111. Abe, M., Komon, K., Nammoto, A., Sugidate, M., Mori, T. and Mike, C. Monitoring of railway bridges in Japan. SPIE-3995, pp. 245-251.
112. Lau, C.K., Mak, W.P.N., Wong, K.Y., Chan, W.Y.K. and Man, K.L.D. (2000). Structural health monitoring of three cable-supported bridges in Hong Kong. SHM-2000, pp. 450-460.
113. Li, H., Qin, Q., Qian, L. and Lau, C-K. (2001). Time domain modal identification of Tsing-Ma suspension bridge. Proc. IMAC 19 (pp. 1585-1591), Feb. 5-8, Kissimmee, FL.
114. Wang, B.S., Liang, X.B., Ni, Y.Q. and Ko, J.M. (2001). Comparative study of damage indices for longspan bridges. Proc. IMAC 19 (pp. 1374-1380), Feb. 5-8, Kissimmee, FL.
115. Ioh, C-H. and Yeh, S-C. Application of neural networks to health monitoring of bridge structures. SPIE-3995, pp. 382-393.
116. Kim, C-Y., Jung, D-S., Kim, N-S. and Yoon, J-G. (2001). Effect of vehicle mass on the measured dynamic characteristics of bridges from traffic-induced vibration tests. Proc. IMAC 19 (pp. 1106-1111), Feb. 5-8, Kissimmee, FL.
117. Kim, C-Y., Kim, N-S., Yoon, J-G. and Jung, D-S. Monitoring system and ambient vibration test of Namhae suspension bridge. SPIE 3995, pp. 324-332.