On the automatic evolution of an OS kernel using temporal logic and AOP

Proceedings - 18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 196-204

  Aberg, Rickard A ^a   Lawall, Julia L ^b   Südholt, Mario ^a   Muller, Gilles ^a   Le Meur, Anne Françoise ^c  

^a ECOLE DES MINES DE NANTES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITÉ BORDEAUX 1   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CIRCUITS; LINUX;

AUTOMATIC EVOLUTION; CONTROL-FLOW; LARGE PROGRAMS; LINUX KERNEL; PROCESS SCHEDULER; PROGRAM POINTS; PROPERTY; SET OF RULES; SOFTWARE EVOLUTION;

TEMPORAL LOGIC;

EID: 20344387626     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ASE.2003.1240307     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation. http://manju.cs.berkeley.edu/cil/.
2. Y. Coady, G. Kiczales, M. Feeley, and G. Smolyn. Using AspectC to improve the modularity of path-specific customization in operating system code. In Symposium on the Foundation of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE-01), pages 88-98, Vienna, Austria, Sept. 2001.
3. Y. Coady, G. Kiczales, J. S. Ong, A. Warfield, and M. Feeley. Brittle systems will break - not bend: Can aspect-oriented programming help? In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGOPS European Workshop, pages 79-86, Saint-Emilion, France, Sept. 2002.
4. R. Douence, O. Motelet, and M. Südholt. A formal definition of crosscuts. In Proceedings of the 3rd Intl. Conference on Metalevel Architectures and Separation of Crosscutting Concerns, volume 2192 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 170-186, Kyoto, Japan, Sept. 2001.
5. S. Drape, O. de Moor, and G. Sittampalam. Transforming the.NET intermediate language using path logic. In Intl. Conf. on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming, pages 133-144, Pittsburgh, PA, Oct. 2002.
6. D. R. Engler, B. Chelf, A. Chou, and S. Hallem. Checking system rules using system-specific, programmer-written compiler extensions. In Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), pages 1-16, San Diego, CA, Oct. 2000.
7. S. Hallem, B. Chelf, Y. Xie, and D. Engler. A system and language for building system-specific, static analyses. In Intl. Conf. on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), pages 69-82, Berlin, Germany, 2002.
8. M. Huth and M. Ryan. Logic in Computer Science: Modelling and reasoning about systems. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
9. D. Lacey and O. de Moor. Imperative program transformation by rewriting. In R. Wilhelm, editor, Intl. Conf. on Compiler Construction (CC), volume 2027 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 52-68, Genova, Italy, 2001.
10. D. Lacey, N. D. Jones, E. Van Wyk, and C. C. Frederiksen. Proving correctness of compiler optimizations by temporal logic. In Conference Record of POPL 2002: The 29th SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 283-294, Portland, OR, Jan. 2002.
11. J. Lawall, G. Muller, and L. P. Barreto. Capturing OS expertise in a modular type system: the Bossa experience. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS European Workshop 2002 (EW2002), pages 54-62, Saint-Emilion, France, Sept. 2002.
12. G. Muller, J. L. Lawall, L. P. Barreto, and J.-F. Susini. A framework for simplifying the development of kernel schedulers: Design and performance evaluation. Technical report 03/2/INFO, Ecole des Mines de Nantes, 2003.
13. G. Necula, S. McPeak, S. Rahul, and W. Weimer. CIL: Intermediate language and tools for C program analysis and transformation. In Intl. Conf. on Compiler Construction (CC), volume 2304 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 213-228, Grenoble, France, Mar. 2002.
14. R. J. Walker and G. C. Murphy. Joinpoints as ordered events: Towards applying implicit context to aspect-orientation. In Proceedings for Advanced Separation of Concerns Workshop, pages 134-139, Toronto, Canada, May 2001.