Shape representation via best orthogonal basis selection

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3216, Issue PART 1, 2004, Pages 225-233

  Mohamed, Ashraf ^a,b   Davatzikos, Christos ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEFORMATION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MEDICAL IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; PROBLEM SOLVING; STATISTICAL METHODS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SAMPLING;

AUTOMATIC LANDMARK SELECTION; MULTI-RESOLUTION FEATURE SPACE; SHAPE REPRESENTATION; WAVELET PACKETS; BASIS SELECTION; BEST BASIS SELECTION; CORPUS CALLOSUM; ORTHOGONAL BASIS; ORTHONORMAL BASIS; STATISTICAL REPRESENTATIONS; STATISTICAL SHAPES;

IMAGE ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION;

EID: 20344386225     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30135-6_28     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. P. Golland, W. E. L. Grimson, M. E. Shenton, and R. Kikinis. Deformation analysis for shape based classification. In Proc. of IPMI'2001, LNCS 2082, pages 517-530, 2001.
2. P. Yushkevich, S. Joshi, S. M. Pizer, J. G. Csernansky, and L. E. Wang. Feature selection for shape-based classficiation of biological objects. In Proc. of IPMI'2003, LNCS 2732, pages 114-125, 2003.
3. J. G. Csernansky, S. Joshi, L. Wang, J. W. Haller, M. Gado, J. P. Miller, U. Grenander, and M. I. Miller. Hippocampal morphometry in schizophrenia by high dimensional brain mapping. In Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 95:11406-11411, Sept. 1998.
4. P. R. Andersen, F. L. Bookstein, K. Conradsen, B. K. Ersbøll, J. L. Marsh, and S. Kreiborg. Surface-bounded growth modeling applied to human mandibles. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 19(11):1053-1063, Nov. 2000.
5. C. Davatzikos, A. Gene, D. Xu, and S. M. Resnik. Voxel-based morphometry using the ravens maps: Mehods and validation using simulation of longitudinal atrophy. Neuroimage, 14:1361-1369, Dec. 2001.
6. T. F. Cootes, C. J. Taylor, D. H. Cooper, and J. Graham. Active shape models - their training and application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 61(1):38-59, 1995.
7. Y. Wang and L. H. Staib. Boundary finding with prior shape and smoothness models. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 22(7):738-743, July 2000.
8. A. Mohamed, S. K. Kyriacou, and C. Davatzikos. A statistical approach for estimating brain tumor induced deformation. Proc. of the IEEE MMBIA Workshop, pages 52-59, December 2001.
9. R. R. Coifman and M. V. Wickerhauser. Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection. IEEE Trans. on Inf. Theory, 38(2), March 1992.
10. C. Davatzikos, X. Tao, and D. Shen. Hierarchical active shape models using the wavelet transform. IEEE Trans. on Med. Imag., 22(3):414-423, March 2003.
11. M. V. Wickerhauser. Fast approximate factor analysis. In Curves and Surfaces in Computer Vision and Graphics II, In SPIE Proc., 1610:23-32, Boston, 1991.
12. N. Saito. Image approximation and modeling via least statistically dependent basis. Pattern Recognition, 34:1765-1784, 2001.
13. F. G. Meyer and J. Chinrungrueng. Analysis of event-related FMRI data using best clustering basis. IEEE Trans. on Med. Imag., 22(8):933-939, Aug. 2003.
14. M. A. Styner, K. T. Rajamani, L. R. Nolte, G. Zsemlye, Gábor Székely, C. J. Taylor, and R. H. Davies. Evaluation of 3d correspondence methods for model building. In Proceedings of IPMI'2003, 2003.
15. L. H. Staib and J. S. Duncan. Boundary finding with parametrically deformable models. IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 14(11):1061-1075, Nov. 1992.