Metal contact dermatitis: Prevalence of sensitization to nickel, cobalt and chromium;Dermatite de contato por metais: Prevalência de sensibilizaç ão ao níquel, cobalto e cromo

Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 137-142

  Duarte, Ida ^a,b   Amorim, José Roberto ^c   Perázzio, Eliene Félix ^a   Schmitz Jr , Rutsnei ^a  

^a FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS MÉDICAS DA SANTA CASA DE SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Chromium; Cobalt; Dermatitis, contact; Metals; Nickel

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; COBALT; NICKEL;

ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; CONTACT DERMATITIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD; PATCH TEST; PREVALENCE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SKIN SENSITIZATION;

EID: 20344379934     PISSN: 03650596     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0365-05962005000200003     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Liden C, Walberg JE. Cross-reactivity to metal compounds studied in guinea pigs induced with chromate or cobalt. Acta Derm Venereol. 1994; 74:341-3.
2. Mass one L. Positive patch tests reactions to nickel, cobalt and potassium dichromate in a series of 576 patients. Cutis. 1991; 47:119-22.
3. Santucci B. Interaction of Metals In Nickel-Sensitive Patients. Contact Dermatitis. 1993; 29:251-3.
4. Grupo Brasileiro de Estudo em Dermatite de Contato. Estudo multicêntrico para elaboração de uma bateria padrāo brasileira de testes de contato. An Bras Dermatol. 2002; 75:147-56.
5. nd ed. Munksgaard, 1981. p. 139.
6. Wang XM, Lin YF, Cheng XF, Zhang YP, Ye ML. Patch testing with the European standard series in Shanghai. Contact Dermatitis. 1994; 30:173.
7. Sharma VK, Chakrabarti A. Common contact sensitizers in Chandigarh, India. A study of 200 patients with European standard series. Contact Dermatitis. 1998; 38:127-31.
8. Basketter DA, Briatico-Vangosa G, Kaestner W, Lally C, Bontinck WJ. Nickel, cobalt and chromium in consumer products: a role in allergic contact dermatitis? Contact Dermatitis. 1993; 28:15-25.
9. Vahter M, Berglund M, Akersson A, Lidén C. Metals and Women's Health. Environ Res. 2002; 88:145-55.
10. Nethercott J, Paustenbach D, Adams R et al. A study of chromium induced allergic contact dermatitis with 54 volunteers: implications for environmental risk assessment. Occup Environ Med. 1994; 51:371-80.
11. Wahlberg JE, Lidén C. Cross-reactivity patterns of cobalt and nickel studied with repeated open applications (ROATs) to the skin of guinea pigs. Contact Dermatitis. 2000; 11:42-8.
12. Johansen JD, Menné T, Christophersen J, Kaaber K, Veien N. Changes in the pattern of sensitization to common contact allergens in Denmark between 1985-86 and 1997-98, with a special view to the effect of preventive strategies. Br J Dermatol. 2000; 142:490-5.
13. Roto P, Sainio H, Reunala T, Laippala P. Addition of ferrous to cement and risk of chromium dermatitis among construction workers. Contact Dermatitis. 1996; 34:43-50
14. Zachariae COC, Agner T, Menné T. Chromium allergy in consecutive patients in a country where ferrous sulfate has been added to cement since 1981. Contact Dermatitis. 1996; 35:83-5.
15. Massimiliano P, Pasquale L, Colombina V, Antonella T. Contact dermatitis from nickel in mobile phones. Contact Dermatitis. 2000; 42:362-3.
16. Manila L, Kilpeläinen M, Terho EO, Koskenvuo M, Helenius H, Kalimo K. Prevalence of nickel allergy among finnish university students in 1995. Contact Dermatitis. 2001; 44:218-23.
17. Ehrlich A, Kucenic M, Belsito DV. Role of body piercing in the induction of metal allergies. Contact Dermatitis. 2001; 12:151-5.