Advances in paediatric tumour imaging

Archives of Disease in Childhood

Volumn 90, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 608-611

  Moon, L ^a   McHugh, K ^b  

^a BARTS HEALTH NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

(3 IODOBENZYL)GUANIDINE; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; CARBON 11; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; GRANULOCYTE COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR; MYELOABLATIVE AGENT; NITROGEN 13; OXYGEN 15; TRACER;

BONE MARROW SUPPRESSION; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CHILDHOOD CANCER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; PEDIATRICS; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REVIEW; SOLID TUMOR; TECHNOLOGY; TUMOR VOLUME;

CHILD; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 20344376907     PISSN: 00039888     EISSN: 14682044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2004.051193     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, et al. Estimated risks of radiation induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 2001;176:289-96.
2. WHO. Handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1979:48.
3. Therasse P, Arbuck S, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumours. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205-16.
4. McHugh K, Rao S. Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST): problems and need for modifications in paediatric oncology. Br J Radiol 2003;76:433-6.
5. Husband JE, Schwarte LH, Spencer J, et al. Evaluation of the response to treatment of solid tumours - a consensus statement of the International Cancer Imaging Society. Br J Cancer 2004;90:2256-60.
6. Prokop M. Multislice CT: technical principles and future trends. Eur Radiol 2003;13:M3-13.
7. Pappas J, Donnelly L, Frush D. Reduced frequency of sedation of young children with multisection helical CT, Radiology 2000;215:897-9.
8. Thomson G, Blair G. Multislice helical CT depiction of Wilms' tumor. J Pediatr Surg 2001;27:912-15.
9. Greess H, Lutze J, Nomayr A, et al. Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 2004;14:995-9.
10. Donnelly L, Emery K, Brody A, et al. Minimising radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT. AJR 2001;176:303-6.
11. Warburg O. On the origin of cells. Science 1956;123:309-14.
12. Som P, Atkins HL, Bandopadhyay D, et al. A fluorinated glucose analogue, 2-fluoro-2-D-glucose (F18):non-toxic tracer for rapid tumour detection. J Nucl Med 1980;21:670-5.
13. Hudson M, Krasin M, Kaste S. PET Imaging in pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma. Pediatr Radiol 2004;34:190-8.
14. Montravers F, Landman-Parker J, Grahek D, et al. Impact of FDG-PET on staging and management in childhood lymphoma: a three-year experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30(suppl 2):S194.
15. Shulkin B. PET imaging in pediatric oncology. Pediatr Radiol 2004;34:199-204.
16. Bredella M, Caputo G, Steinbach L. Value of FDG positron emission tomography in conjunction with MR imaging for evaluating therapy response in patients with musculoskeletal sarcomas. AJR 2002;179:1145-50.
17. Shulkin B, Hutchinson R, Castle V, et al. Neuroblastoma: positron emission tomography with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose compared with metalodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy. Radiology 1996;199:743-50.
18. Vaidya S, Payne G, Leach M, et al. Potential role of MR spectroscopy in assessment of tumour response in childhood cancer. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:728-35.