Fish biomass size spectra in Chesapeake Bay

Estuaries

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 226-240

  Jung, Sukgeun ^a   Houde, Edward D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; BODY SHAPE; FISH; TROPHIC CONDITIONS;

CHESAPEAKE BAY; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

ANCHOA; ANCHOA MITCHILLI;

EID: 20344376429     PISSN: 01608347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02732857     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. AHRENHOLZ, D. W. 1991. Population biology and life history of North American menhadens. Marine Fisheries Review 53:3-19.
2. BAIRD, D. AND R. E. ULANOWICZ. 1989. The seasonal dynamics of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem. Ecological Monographs 59:329-364.
3. BANSE, K. AND S. MOSHER. 1980. Adult body mass and annual production/biomass relationships of field populations. Ecological Monographs 50:355-379.
4. BIANCHI, G., H. GISLASON, K. GRAHAM, L. HILL, X. JIN, K. KORANTENG, S. MANICKCHAND-HEILEMAN, I. PAY, K. SAINSBURY, F. SANCHEZ, AND K. ZWANENBURG. 2000. Impact of fishing on size composition and diversity of demersal fish communities. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57:558-571.
5. BORGMANN, U. 1982. Particle-size conversion efficiency and total animal production in pelagic ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 39:668-674.
6. BORGMANN, U. 1987. Models on the slope of, and biomass flow up, the biomass size spectrum. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 44:136-140.
7. BOUDREAU, P. R. AND L. M. DICKIE. 1989. Biological models of fisheries production based on physiological and ecological scalings of body size. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46:614-623.
8. BOUDREAU, P. R. AND L. M. DICKIE. 1992. Biomass spectra of aquatic ecosystems in relation to fisheries yield. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49:1528-1538.
9. BOUDREAU, P. R., L. M. DICKIE, AND S. R. KERR. 1991. Body-size spectra of production and biomass as system-level indicators of ecological dynamics. Journal of Theoretical Biology 152:329-339.
10. BREITBURG, D. L. 1992. Episodic hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay: Interacting effects of recruitment, behavior, and physical disturbance. Ecological Monographs 62:525-546.
11. BREITBURG, D. L., L. PIHL, AND S. E. KOLESAR. 2001. Effects of low dissolved oxygen on the behavior, ecology and harvest of fishes: A comparison of the Chesapeake Bay and Baltic-Kattegat systems, p. 241-267. In N. N. Rabalais and R. E. Turner (eds.), Coastal Hypoxia: Consequences for Living Resources and Ecosystems, Coastal and Estuarine Studies 58. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.
12. CADDY, J. F., J. CSIRKE, S. M. GARCIA, R. J. R. GRAINGER, D. PAULY, AND R. F. V. CHRISTENSEN. 1998. How pervasive is "Fishing Down Marine Food Webs"? Science 282:1383.
13. COOPER, S. R. AND G. S. BRUSH. 1993. A 2,500-year history of anoxia and eutrophication in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 16:617-626.
14. CRONIN, W. B. 1971. Volumetric, Areal, and Tidal Statistics of the Chesapeake Bay Estuary and Its Tributaries, Special Report 20. Chesapeake Bay Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
15. CYR, H. AND R. H. PETERS. 1996. Biomass-size spectra and the prediction of fish biomass in lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:994-1006.
16. DICKIE, L. M., S. R. KERR, AND P. R. BOUDREAU. 1987. Size-dependent processes underlying regularities in ecosystem structure. Ecological Monographs 57:233-250.
17. DUPLISEA, D. E. AND S. R. KERR. 1995. Application of a biomass size spectrum model to demersal fish data from the Scotian Shelf. Journal of Theoretical Biology 177:263-269.
18. FRIEDLAND, K. D., L. W. HAAS, AND J. V. MERRINER. 1984. Filtering rates of the juvenile Atlantic menhaden Brevoortia tyrannus (Pisces: Clupeidae), with consideration of the effects of detritus and swimming speed. Marine Biology 84:109-117.
19. GAEDKE, U. 1992a. Identifying ecosystem properties: A case study using plankton biomass size distributions. Ecological Modelling 63:277-298.
20. GAEDKE, U. 1992b. The size distribution of plankton biomass in a large lake and its seasonal variability. Limnology and Oceanography 37:1202-1220.
21. HAGY, III, J. D. 2002. Eutrophication, hypoxia, and trophic transfer efficiency in Chesapeake Bay. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
22. HARDING, L. W., M. E. MALLONEE, AND E. S. PERRY. 2002. Toward a predictive understanding of primary productivity in a temperate, partially stratified estuary. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 55:437-463.
23. HARDING, L. W. AND E. S. PERRY. 1997. Long-term increase of phytoplankton biomass in Chesapeake Bay, 1950-1994. Marine Ecology Progress Series 157:39-52.
24. HARTMAN, K. J. AND S. B. BRANDT. 1995. Estimating energy density of fish. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 124:347-355.
25. HEATH, M. R. 1996. The consequences of spawning time and dispersal patterns of larvae for spatial and temporal variability in survival to recruitment, p. 175-207. In Y. Watanabe, Y. Yamashita, and Y. Oozeki (eds.), Survival Strategies in Early Life Stages of Marine Resources. A. A. Balkema, Netherlands.
26. HILL, M. O. 1974. Correspondence analysis: A neglected multivariate method. Applied Statistics 23:340-354.
27. HOLLAND, A. F., N. K. MOUNTFORD, M. H. HIEGEL, K. R. KAUMEYER, AND J. A. MIHURSKY. 1980. The influence of predation on infaunal abundance in upper Chesapeake Bay. Marine Biology 57:221-235.
28. HOLLING, C. S. 1992. Cross-scale morphology, geometry, and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecological Monographs 62:447-502.
29. HOMER, M. AND W. R. BOYNTON. 1978. Stomach analysis of fish collected in the Calvert cliffs region, Chesapeake Bay - 1977. Final report to Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Power Plant Siting Program, University of Maryland Center for Environmental & Estuarine Studies. Chesapeake Biological Laboratory. Reference No. UMCEES 78-154-CBL. Annapolis, Maryland.
30. HOUDE, E. D., M. J. FOGARTY, AND T. J. MILLER. 1998. Prospects for multispecies fisheries management in Chesapeake Bay. A Workshop. April 1-3 1998. Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee Publication 98-002. Solomons, Maryland.
31. HOUDE, E. D., S. JUKIC-PELADIC, S. B. BRANDT, AND S. D. LEACH. 1999. Ecosystems at the land-margin: Drainage basin to coastal sea. Fisheries: Trends in catches, abundances and management, p. 341-366. In T. C. Malone, A. Malej, L. W. Harding, N. Smodlaka, and R. E. Turner (eds.), Coastal and Estuarine Studies, Volume 55. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.
32. IVERSON, R. L. 1990. Control of marine fish production. Limnology and Oceanography 35:1593-1604.
33. JENNINGS, S. AND J. L. BLANCHARD. 2004. Fish abundance with no fishing: Predictions based on macroecological theory. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:632-642.
34. JENNINGS, S., S. P. R. GREENSTREET, L. HILL, G. J. PIET, J. K. PINNEGAR, AND K. J. WARR. 2002. Long-term trends in the trophic structure of the North Sea fish community: Evidence from stable-isotope analysis, size-spectra and community metrics. Marine Biology 141:1085-1097.
35. JONES, R. 1984. Some observations on energy transfer through the North Sea and Georges Bank food webs. Rapports et Proces-verbaux des Reunions du Conseil Internationale pour l'Exploration de la Mer 183:204-217.
36. JUNG, S. 2002. Fish community structure and the spatial and temporal variability in recruitment and biomass production in Chesapeake Bay. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
37. JUNG, S. AND E. D. HOUDE. 2003. Spatial and temporal variability of pelagic fish community structure and distribution in Chesapeake Bay, U.S.A. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 58:341-357.
38. JUNG, S. AND E. D. HOUDE. 2004a. Recruitment and spawning-stock biomass distribution of bay anchovy (Anchoa mitchilli) in Chesapeake Bay. Fishery Bulletin, U.S. 102:63-77.
39. JUNG, S. AND E. D. HOUDE. 2004b. Production of bay anchovy Anchoa mitchilli in Chesapeake Bay: Application of size-based theory. Marine Ecology Progress Series 281:217-232.
40. KEMP, W. M., E. M. SMITH, M. MARVIN-DIPASQUALE, AND W. R. BOYNTON. 1997. Organic carbon balance and net ecosystem metabolism in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 150:229-248.
41. KERR, S. R. AND L. M. DICKIE. 2001. The Biomass Spectrum: A Predator-prey Theory of Aquatic Production, 1st edition. Columbia University Press, New York.
42. LATOUR, R. J., M. J. BRUSH, AND C. F. BONZEK. 2003. Ecosystem-based fisheries management: Strategies for multispecies modeling and associated data requirements. Fisheries 28:10-22.
43. LEHMAN, J. T. 1988. Ecological principles affecting community structure and secondary production by zooplankton in marine and freshwater environments. Limnology and Oceanography 33:931-945.
44. LEVIN, S. A. 1980. Several measures of trophic structure applicable to complex food webs. Journal of Theoretical Biology 83:195-206.
45. LEWIS, V. P. AND D. S. PETERS. 1994. Diet of juvenile and adult Atlantic menhaden in estuarine and coastal habitats. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 124:520-537.
46. LUDWIG, J. A. AND J. F. REYNOLDS. 1988. Statistical Ecology. A Primer on Methods and Computing, 1st edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
47. MILLER, T. J., M. C. CHRISTMAN, K. CURTI, E. D. HOUDE, D. LOEWENSTEINER, J. A. NYE, B. MUFFLEY, A. F. SHAROV, AND J. H. VOLSTAD. 2004. Abundance, distribution and diversity of Chesapeake Bay fishes: Results from CHESFIMS (Chesapeake Bay Fishery Independent Multispecies Fisheries Survey), p. 81-89. In D. M. Orner (ed.), Chesapeake Bay Fisheries Research Program Symposium Report. 2003. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Chesapeake Bay Office, Annapolis, Maryland.
48. MINNS, C. K., E. S. MILLARD, J. M. COOLEY, M. G. JOHNSON, D. A. HURLEY, K. H. NICHOLLS, G. W. ROBINSON, G. E. OWEN, AND A. CROWDER. 1987. Production and biomass-size spectra in the Bay of Quinte, a eutrophic ecosystem. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 44:148-155.
49. PLATT, T. AND K. DENMAN. 1978. The structure of pelagic marine ecosystems. Rapports et Proces-verbaux des Reunions du Conseil Internationale pour l'Exploration de la Mer 173:60-65.
50. POPE, J. G., J. G. SHEPHERD, AND J. WEBB. 1994. Successful surfriding on size spectra: The secret of survival in the sea. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B. 343:41-49.
51. PURCELL, J. E. AND M. N. ARAI. 2001. Interactions of pelagic cnidarians and ctenophores with fish: A review. Hydrobiologia 451:27-44.
52. PURCELL, J. E., D. A. NEMAZIE, S. E. DORSEY, E. D. HOUDE, AND J. C. GAMBLE. 1994. Predation mortality of bay anchovy Anchoa mitchilli eggs and larvae due to scyphomedusae and ctenophores in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 114:47-58.
53. RICE, J. C. 2000. Evaluating fishery impacts using metrics of community structure. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57:682-688.
54. ROCHET, M. AND V. M. TRENKEL. 2003. Which community indicators can measure the impact of fishing? A review and proposals. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:67-85.
55. SAS INSTITUTE INC. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
56. SCHARF, F. S., F. JUANES, AND R. A. ROUNTREE. 2000. Predator size-prey size relationships of marine fish predators: Interspecific variation and effects of ontogeny and body size on trophic-niche breadth. Marine Ecology Progress Series 208:229-248.
57. SCHWINGHAMER, P. 1985. Observations on size-structure and pelagic coupling of some shelf and abyssal benthic communities, p. 347-359. In P. E. Gibbs (ed.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth European Marine Biology Symposium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
58. SHELDON, R. W., A. PRAKASH, AND W. H. SUTCLIFFE. 1972. The size distribution of particles in the ocean. Limnology and Oceanography 17:327-340.
59. SPRULES, W. G., S. B. BRANDT, D. J. STEWART, M. MUNAWAR, E. H. JIN, AND J. LOVE. 1991. Biomass size spectrum of the Lake Michigan pelagic food web. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:105-115.
60. SPRULES, W. G. AND M. MUNAWAR. 1986. Plankton size spectra in relation to ecosystem productivity, size and perturbation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 43:1789-1794.
61. SPRULES, W. G. AND J. D. STOCKWELL. 1995. Size-based biomass and production models in the St Lawrence Great Lakes. ICES Marine Science Symposium 52:705-710.
62. THIEBAUX, M. L. AND L. M. DICKIE. 1992. Models of aquatic biomass size spectra and the common structure of their solution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 159:147-161.
63. THIEBAUX, M. L. AND L. M. DICKIE. 1993. Structure of the body-size spectrum of the biomass in aquatic ecosystems: A consequence of allometry in predator-prey interactions. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50:1308-1317.
64. TRENKEL, V. M. AND M. I. ROCHET. 2003. Performance of indicators derived from abundance estimates for detecting the impact of fishing on a fish community. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:67-85.
65. WANG, S. B. AND E. D. HOUDE. 1994. Energy storage and dynamics in bay anchovy Anchoa mitchilli. Marine Biology 121:219-227.
66. WARWICK, R. M. 1984. Species size distributions in marine benthic communities. Oecologia 61:32-41.
67. WARWICK, R. M. AND I. R. JOINT. 1987. The size distribution of organisms in the Celtic Sea: From bacteria to Metazoa. Oecologia 73:185-191.
68. WEISBERG, S. B. AND A. J. JANICKI. 1990. Summer feeding patterns of white perch, channel catfish, and yellow perch in the Susquehanna River, Maryland. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 5:391-405.
69. WITEK, Z. AND A. KRAJEWSKA-SOLTYS. 1989. Some examples of the epipelagic plankton size structure in high latitude oceans. Journal of Plankton Research 11:1143-1155.
70. ZHOU, M. AND M. E. HUNTLEY. 1997. Population dynamics theory of plankton based on biomass spectra. Marine Ecology Progress Series 159:61-73.