Repeat prostate biopsies following diagnoses of prostate intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small gland proliferation

International Braz J Urol

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 131-136

  Moreira Leite, Katia Ramos ^a,b   Mitteldorf, Cristina A ^a   Camara Lopes, Luiz H ^a  

^a HOSPITAL SÍRIO LIBANÊS   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Adenocarcinoma; Needle biopsies; Prostate; Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INCIDENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EPITHELIUM TUMOR; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL;

EID: 20344375253     PISSN: 16775538     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382005000200007     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bostwick DG, Qian J: High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Mod Pathol. 2004; 17: 360-79.
2. Kronz JD, Allan CH, Shaikh AA, Epstein JI: Predicting cancer following a diagnosis of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy: data on men with more than one follow-up biopsy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001; 25: 1079-85.
3. Lefkowitz GK, Taneja SS, Brown J, Melamed J, Lepor H: Follow up interval prostate biopsy 3 years after diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is associated with high likelihood of prostate cancer, independent of change in prostate specific antigen levels. J Urol. 2002; 168: 1415-8.
4. Epstein JI, Potter SR: The pathological interpretation and significance of prostate needle biopsy findings: implications and current controversies. J Urol. 2001; 166: 402-10.
5. Rubin MA, Bismar TA, Curtis S, Montie JE: Prostate needle biopsy reporting: how are the surgical members of the society of urologic oncology using pathology reports to guide treatment of prostate cancer patients? Am J Surg Pathol. 2004; 28: 946-52.
6. Fadare O, Wang S, Mariappan MR: Practice patterns of clinicians following isolated diagnoses if atypical small acinar proliferation on prostate biopsy specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004; 128: 557-60.
7. Ickzowski KA, MacLennan GT, Bostwick DG: Atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy in prostate needle biopsies: clinical significance in 33 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997; 21: 1489-95.
8. Renshaw AA, Santis WF, Richie JP: Clinicopathological characteristics of prostatic adenocarcinoma in men with atypical prostate needle biopsies. J Urol. 1998; 159: 2018-21; discussion 2022.
9. Iczkoeski KA, Chen HM, Yang XJ, Beach RA: Prostate cancer diagnosed after initial biopsy with small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy is similar to cancer found on initial biopsy. Urology. 2002; 60: 851-4.
10. Srigley JR: Benign mimickers of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2004; 17: 328-48.
11. Epstein JI: Diagnosis and reporting of limited adenocarcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy. Mod Pathol. 2004; 17: 307-15.
12. Allen EA, Kahane H, Epstein JI: Repeat biopsy strategies for men with atypical diagnoses on initial prostate needle biopsy. Urology. 1998; 52: 803-7.
13. Alvarez-Alvarez C, Silva EA, Pesqueira D, Miguel-Fraile PS, Ortiz-Rey JA, Antón-Badiola I, et al.: Atypical small glands in prostate needle biopsies. Diagnostic value of clinicopathological parameters. Int Br J Urol. 2000; 26: 503-509.
14. Cheville JC, Reznicek MJ, Bostwick DG: The focus of "atypical glands, suspicious for malignancy" in prostatic needle biopsy specimens: incidence, histologic features, and clinical follow-up of cases diagnosed in a community practice. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997; 108: 633-40.
15. Brausi M, Castagnetti G, Dotti A, De Luca G, Olmi R, Cesinaro AM: Immediate radical prostatectomy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation. Over treatment? J Urol. 2004; 172: 906-9; discussion 908-9.
16. Shepherd D, Keetch DW, Humphrey PA, Smith DS, Stahl D: Repeat biopsy strategy in men with isolated prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate needle biopsy. J Urol. 1996; 156: 460-2; discussion 462-3.