Managing conflict at the end of life

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 352, Issue 23, 2005, Pages 2371-2373

  Bloche, M Gregg ^a,b,c  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROOKINGS INSTITUTION   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAREGIVER; CONFLICT; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; DYING; FAMILY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; PHILOSOPHY; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIGION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHORT SURVEY; SOCIAL WORK; SUICIDE; ARTICLE; DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; FAMILY RELATION; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL ASPECT; LIVING WILL; LONG TERM CARE; PASSIVE EUTHANASIA; PATIENT RIGHT; TERMINAL CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; LEGAL APPROACH;

ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; DECISION MAKING; DISSENT AND DISPUTES; EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE; FAMILY RELATIONS; HUMANS; JUDICIAL ROLE; LIFE SUPPORT CARE; MEDICAL FUTILITY; PATIENT RIGHTS; RELIGION AND MEDICINE; TERMINAL CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 20344374755     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp058104     Document Type: Short Survey

References (5)

1. Kressel K, Pruitt DC. Mediation research: the process and effectiveness of third-party intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989.
2. Frey BS. Institutions and morale: the crowding-out effect. In: Ben-Ner A, Putterman L, eds. Economics, values, and organization. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1998:437-60.
3. Dubler NN, Liebman CB. Bioethics mediation: a guide to shaping shared solutions. New York: United Hospital Fund of New York, 2004.
4. Bloche MG. Trust and betrayal in the medical marketplace. Stanford Law Rev 2002;55:919-54.
5. Roman Catholic Diocese of St. Petersburg, Florida. Statement of Bishop Robert N. Lynch. February 28, 2005. (Accessed May 19, 2005, at http://www.dioceseofstpete.org/content.php? P=119.)