Study on lymphocyte proliferation in nickel sensitive patients;Estudo da proliferação linfocitária em pacientes sensibilizados ao níquel

Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 149-158

  Galli Sanchez, Ana Paula ^a,g   Wakisaka Maruta, Celina ^b   Sato, Maria Notomi ^c   Ribeiro, Ricardo Luiz ^d   De Almeida Zomignan, Carolina ^e   Spina Nunes, Ricardo ^f   Silva Dos Reis, Vitor Manoel ^f  

^a Serviço de Dermatologia do Complexo Hospitalar Padre Bento de Guarulhos SP   (Brazil)

^b Departamento de Dermatologia da FMUSP

^c Biomédica

^d Faculdade de Medicina de Santo Amaro (SP)   (Brazil)

^e Laboratorio de Investigacao em Dermatologia e Imunodeficiencias

^f UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^g NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dermatitis, contact; Lymphocyte activation; Nickel

Indexed keywords

CANDIDA ANTIGEN; NICKEL; NICKEL SULFATE; OKT 3; PHYTOHEMAGGLUTININ; POKEWEED MITOGEN; THYMIDINE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERSENSITIVITY; LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; LYMPHOCYTE PROLIFERATION; MALE; PATCH TEST; PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELL; RADIOACTIVITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 20344370011     PISSN: 03650596     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0365-05962005000200005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Grupo Brasileiro de Estudo em Dermatite de Contato (GBEDC). Estudo multicêntrico para elaboração de uma bateria-padrão brasileira de teste de contato. An Bras Dermatol. 2000;75:147-56.
2. Host nek JJ. Nickel-induced hypersensitivity: etiology, immune reaction, prevention and therapy. Arch Dermatol Res. 2002;294:249-67.
3. Gawkrodger DJ, Vestey JP, Wong WK, Buxton PK. Contact clinic survey of nickel-sensitive subjects. Contact Dermatitis. 1986;14:165-9.
4. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF. Fisher's contact dermatitis. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
5. Fisher T, Rystedt I. False-positive, follicular and irritant patch test reactions to metal salts. Contact Dermatitis. 1985;12:93-8.
6. Aspegren N, Rorsman H. Short-term culture of leucocytes in nickel hypersensitivity. Acta Derm Venereol. 1962;42:412-7.
7. Grosfeld JCM, Penders AJM, Grood R, Verwilghen L. In vitro investigations of chromium and nickel-hypersensitivity with culture of skin and peripheral lymphocytes. Dermatologica. 1966;132:189-98.
8. Macleod TM, Hutchinson F, Raffle EJ. The uptake of labeled thymidine by leucocytes of nickel sensitive patients. Br J Dermatol. 1970;82:487-92.
9. Pappas A, Orfanos CE, Bertram R. Non-specific lymphocyte transformation in vitro by nickel acetate. J Invest Dermatol. 1970;55:198-200.
10. Forman L, Alexander S. Nickel antibodies. Br J Dermatol. 1972;87:320-6.
11. Hutchinson F, Raffle EJ, Macleod TM. The specificity of lymphocyte transformation in vitro by nickel salts in nickel sensitive subjects. J Invest Dermatol. 1972;58:362-5.
12. Millikan LR, Conway F, Foote JE. In vitro studies of contact hypersensitivity: lymphocyte transformation in nickel sensitivity. J Invest Dermatol. 1973;60:88-90.
13. Gimenez-Camamasa JM, Garcia-Calderon P, Asensio J, Moragas JM. Lymphocyte transformation test in allergic contact nickel dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 1975;92:9-15.
14. Kim CW, Schöpf E. A comparative study of nickel hypersensitivity by lymphocyte transformation test in atopic and non-atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol Res. 1976;257:57-65.
15. Svejgaard E, Morling N, Svejgaard A, Veien NK. Lymphocyte transformation induced by nickel sulphate: an in vitro study of subjects with and without a positive nickel patch test. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh). 1978;58:245-50.
16. Veien NK, Svejgaard E, Menné T. In vitro lymphocyte transformation to nickel: a study of nickel-sensitive patients before and after epicutaneous and oral challenge with nickel. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh). 1979;59:447-51.
17. Silvennoinen-Kassinen S. Lymphocyte transformation in nickel allergy: amplification of T-lymphocyte responses to nickel sulphate by macrophages. Scand J Immunol. 1980;12:61-5.
18. Al-Tawil NG, Marcusson JA, Möller E. Lymphocyte transformation test in patients with nickel sensitivity: an aid to diagnosis. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh). 1981;8:511-5.
19. MacLeod TM, Hutchinson F; Raffle EJ. In vitro studies on blastogenic lymphokine activity in nickel allergy. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh). 1982;62:249-50.
20. Nordlind, K. Lymphocyte transformation test in diagnosis of nickel allergy. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1984;73:151-4.
21. Von Blomberg-van der Flier M, Van der Burg CKH, Pos O, Van de Plassche-Boers EM, Bruynzeel DP, Garotta G et al. In vitro studies in nickel allergy: diagnostic value of dual parameter analysis. J Invest Dermatol. 1987;88:362-8.
22. Everness KM, Gawkrodger DJ, Botham PA, Hunter JAA. The discrimination between nickel-sensitive and non-nickel-sensitive subjects by an in vitro lymphocyte transformation test. Br J Dermatol. 1990;122:293-8.
23. Räsänen L, Tuomi M. Diagnostic value of lymphocyte proliferation test in nickel contact allergy and provocation in occupation coin dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1992;27:250-4.
24. Cederbrant K, Hultman P, Marcusson JA, Tibbling L. In vitro lymphocyte proliferation as compared to patch test using gold, palladium and nickel. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1997;112:212-7.
25. Wilkinson DS, Fregert S, Magnusson B, Bandmann HJ, Calnan CD, Cronin E, et al. Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh). 1970;50:287-92.
26. Kurnick JT. Cellular assays. In: Colvi RB, Bhan AK, McCluskey RT, editors. Diagnostic Immunophatology. New York: Raven; 1995. p.751-6.
27. Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Non parametric statistics. 2th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1988.
28. Al-Tawil NG, Berggren G, Emtestam L, Fransson J, Jernselius R, Marcusson JA. Correlation between quantitative in vivo and in vitro responses in nickel-allergic patients. Acta Derm Venereol. 1985;65:385-9.
29. Sinigaglia F. The molecular basis of metal racognation by T cells. J Invest Dermatol. 1994;102:398-401.