On visualizing the Semantic Web in MS office

Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Visualisation

Volumn 2002-January, Issue , 2002, Pages 441-446

  Fillies, C ^a   Sure, Y ^b  

^a Semtation GmbH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer aided software engineering; Microstrip; Object oriented modeling; Ontologies; Resource description framework; Search engines; Semantic Web; Shape; Visualization; Web services

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; FLOW VISUALIZATION; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; ONTOLOGY; SEARCH ENGINES; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; VISUALIZATION; WEB SERVICES; WEBSITES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

2-D VISUALIZATIONS; CREATION PROCESS; MICROSTRIPES; OBJECT ORIENTED MODEL; RESOURCE DESCRIPTION FRAMEWORK; SEMANTIC NET; SEMANTIC WEB MODELS; SHAPE;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 20344368362     PISSN: 10939547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IV.2002.1028811     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Fillies,C.; Weichhardt, F.; SemTalk: A RDFS Editor for Visio 2000 Position Paper, ICCS 2001 9th International Conference on Conceptual Structures/Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS)
2. Tim Berners-Lee, Jim Hendler, and Ora Lassila published an article about the Semantic Web in Scientifc American. "A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities". See http://www.scientificamerican.com/2001/0501issue/05 01berners-lee.html
3. Gruber, T. (1995). Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, (43):907-928.
4. S. Staab, H.-P. Schnurr, R. Studer, and Y. Sure. Knowledge processes and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on Knowledge Management, 16(1), January/Febrary 2001.
5. John Flynn. DAMLVisio Shapes, cf. http://www.daml.org/visiodaml/
6. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I. (1999) The unified modeling language user guide, Addison-Wesley, Reading Mass.
7. W3C. RDF Schema Specification. http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-rdf-schema/, 1999.
8. O. Lassila and R. Swick. Resource description framework (RDF). model and syntax specification. Technical report, W3C, 1999. W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax.
9. WordNet, cf. http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/~wn/
10. S. Decker, M. Erdmann, D. Fensel, and R. Studer. Ontobroker: Ontology Based access to Distributed and Semi-Structured Information. In R. Meersman et al., editors, Database Semantics: Semantic Issues in Multimedia Systems, pages 351-369. Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1999.
11. cf. http://eccma.org/unspsc/
12. Dan Brickley. RDF(S) web service for WordNet 1.6, cf. http://xmlns.com/2001/08/wordnet/
13. S. Decker, D. Brickley, J. Saarela, J. Angele. A Query Service for RDF. Query Languages 98, W3C Workshop.
14. M. Kifer, G. Lausen, and J. Wu. Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages. Journal of the ACM, 42, 741-843, (1995).
15. Darpa Agent Markup Language (DAML), cf. http://www.daml.org
16. Fillies, C., Wood-Albrecht, G., Weichhardt, F., A Pragmatic Application of the Semantic Web Using SemTalk. WWW2002, May 7-11, 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA ACM 1-5811-449-5/02/0005
17. DAML+OIL ontology markup language, cf. http://www.daml.org/2001/03/reference.html March 2001
18. Dörr, M., Guarino, N., Fernández López, M., Schulten, E., Stefanova, M., Tate, A., State of the Art in Content Standards. OntoWeb Deliverable 3.1. www.ontoweb.org/download/deliverables/D3.1 November 2001