Shape particle filtering for image segmentation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3216, Issue PART 1, 2004, Pages 168-175

  De Bruijne, Marleen ^a   Nielsen, Mads ^a  

^a IT UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIFICATION (BIOCHEMISTRY); COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; MEDICAL IMAGING; OPTIMIZATION; RADIOGRAPHY; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

MANUAL INTERVENTION; MEDICAL IMAGE SEGMENTATION; NON-PARAMETRIC CLASSIFIERS; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; DEFORMABLE TEMPLATES; GLOBAL SHAPE MODEL; LEFT VENTRICLES; LUNG FIELD SEGMENTATION; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; PIXEL CLASSIFICATION; SHAPE INFERENCE; STOCHASTIC SAMPLING;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 20344364391     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30135-6_21     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. P.M. Alkoot and J. Kittler. Moderating k-NN classifiers. Pattern Analysis & Applications, 5(3):326-332, 2002.
2. S. Arya, D.M. Mount, N.S. Netanyahu, R. Silverman, and A.Y. Wu. An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching. Journal of the ACM, (45):891-923, 1998.
3. Gilles Aubert and Pierre Kornprobst. Mathematical problems in image processing, volume 147 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer Verlag, 2002.
4. H.G. Bosch, S.C. Mitchell, B.P.F. Lelieveldt, F. Nijland, O. Kamp, M. Sonka, and J.H.C. Reiber. Active appearance-motion models for endocardial contour detection in time sequences of echocardiograms. In Med Imaging: Image Process, volume 4322 of Proc of SPIE. SPIE Press, 2001.
5. M. Brejl and M. Sonka. Object localization and border detection criteria design in edgebased image segmentation: automated learning from examples. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 19(10):973-985, 2000.
6. D. Comaniciu and P. Meer. Mean shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis. IEEE TPAMI, 24(5):603-619, 2002.
7. T.F. Cootes, G.J. Edwards, and C.J. Taylor. Active appearance models. IEEE TPAMI, 23(6):681-684, 2001.
8. T.F. Cootes, C.J. Taylor, D.H. Cooper, and J. Graham. Active shape models - their training and application. Comput Vis Image Underst, 61(1):38-59, 1995.
9. M. de Bruijne, B. van Ginneken, M.A. Viergever, and W.J. Niessen. Adapting active shape models for 3D segmentation of tubular structures in medical images. In IPMI, volume 2732 of LNCS, pages 136-147. Springer, 2003.
10. A. Doucet, N. de Freitas, and N. Gordon, editors. Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001.
11. M. Isard and A. Blake. CONDENSATION - conditional density propagation for visual tracking. Int J Comput Vis, 29(1):5-28, 1998.
12. A.K. Jain, Y. Zhong, and M.P. Dubuisson-Jolly. Deformable template models: A review. Signal Processing, 71(2):109-129, 1998.
13. S. Sclaroff and J. Isidoro. Active blobs: region-based, deformable appearance models. Comput Vis Image Underst, 89(2-3): 197-225, 2003.
14. I.M. Scott, T.F. Cootes, and C.J. Taylor. Improving appearance model matching using local image structure. In IPMI, volume 2732 of LNCS, pages 258-269. Springer, 2003.
15. J. Shiraishi, S. Katsuragawa, J. Ikezoe, T. Matsumoto, T. Kobayashi, K. Komatsu, M. Matsui, H. Fujita, Y. Kodera, and K. Doi. Development of a digital image database for chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule: Receiver operating character- istic analysis of radiologists' detection of pulmonary nodules. Am J Roentgenol, 174:71-74, 2000.
16. P.P. Smyth, C.J. Taylor, and J.E. Adams. Vertebral shape: Automatic measurement with active shape models. Radiology, 211(2):571-578, 1999.
17. M.B. Stegmann, R. Fisker, and B.K. Ersbø11. Extending and applying active appearance models for automated, high precision segmentation in different image modalities. In Proceedings of the 12th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis, 2001.
18. B. van Ginneken, A.F. Frangi, J.J. Staal, B.M. ter Haar Romeny, and M.A. Viergever. Active shape model segmentation with optimal features. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 21(8):924-933, 2002.
19. S.K. Warfield, M. Kaus, F.A. Jolesz, and R. Kikinis. Adaptive, template moderated, spatially varying statistical classification. Med Image Anal, 4:43-55, 2000.
20. G. Zamora, H. Sari-Sarrafa, and R. Long. Hierarchical segmentation of vertebrae from x-ray images. In Med Imaging: Image Process, volume 5032 of Proc of SPIE, pages 631-642. SPIE Press, 2003.