-
1
-
-
0004056428
-
-
edited by E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii, 3rd ed. (Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford), Chap. XIV
-
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, in Statistical Physics, V. 5 Course of Theoretical Physics Vol. 5, edited by E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii, 3rd ed. (Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, 1980), Chap. XIV.
-
(1980)
Statistical Physics, V. 5 Course of Theoretical Physics
, vol.5
-
-
Landau, L.D.1
Lifshitz, E.M.2
-
9
-
-
20344396993
-
-
note
-
The reasons behind as well as the implications of the following free energy have been discussed in Kumar (See Ref. 6). In brief, the goals are to (a) consider powers of the order parameter which are invariant with respect to the symmetry operations and (b) allow the thermodynamic free energy to have the desired temperature and field dependence. In Ref. 6, there are two expressions for the free energy, one with a weight function as below and the other with a Gaussian-like form similar to Eqs. (9) and (12). These expressions are related via a variable transformation. Because the latter contain fractional powers of the order parameter, we expect that the expressions given below are more likely to be directly related to a microscopic theory.
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
0033993169
-
-
D. Hall, R. G. Goodrich, C. G. Grenier, P. Kumar, M. Chaparala, and M. Norton, Philos. Mag. B 80, 61 (2000).
-
(2000)
Philos. Mag. B
, vol.80
, pp. 61
-
-
Hall, D.1
Goodrich, R.G.2
Grenier, C.G.3
Kumar, P.4
Chaparala, M.5
Norton, M.6
-
14
-
-
0001341473
-
-
There have been reports of small discontinuities, such as in B. F. Woodfield, D. A. White, R. A. Fisher, N. E. Phillips, and H. Y. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4622 (1999). These authors cite the small discontinuity as a reason for the phase transtion in BKBO being of a standard second order. However, their possible consistency with a vanishing specific heat discontinuity is discussed in Ref. 6. That a higher order transition could look like a smeared discontinuity, but that the temperature dependence of the superfluid density (as measured by the London penetration length) would have a characteristic temperature dependence. Regardless of whether the interpretations of Ref. 5 or those of Woodfield et al. stand the test of time, the model free energies in Eqs. (2) and (3) are worth examining for their consequences, as in the results reported here.
-
(1999)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.83
, pp. 4622
-
-
Woodfield, B.F.1
White, D.A.2
Fisher, R.A.3
Phillips, N.E.4
Tang, H.Y.5
-
16
-
-
0000155177
-
-
F. Sharifi, A. Pargellis, R. C. Dynes, B. Miller, E. S. Hellman, J. Rosamilia, and E. H. Hartford, Jr., Phys. Rev. B 44, 12 521 (1991);
-
(1991)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.44
, pp. 12521
-
-
Sharifi, F.1
Pargellis, A.2
Dynes, R.C.3
Miller, B.4
Hellman, E.S.5
Rosamilia, J.6
Hartford Jr., E.H.7
-
17
-
-
0010175243
-
-
P. Szabo, P. Samuely, L. N. Bobrov, J. Marcus, C. Escribe-Filippini, and M. Affronte, Physica C 235, 1873 (1994).
-
(1994)
Physica C
, vol.235
, pp. 1873
-
-
Szabo, P.1
Samuely, P.2
Bobrov, L.N.3
Marcus, J.4
Escribe-Filippini, C.5
Affronte, M.6
-
21
-
-
20344395231
-
-
note
-
Here we limit ourselves to those defects that are described by a GL type free energy in Eqs. (2) and (3).
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
36049053467
-
-
also see, M. Tinkham, in Ref. 10, p. 288
-
J. S. Langer and V. Ambegaokar, Phys. Rev. 164, 498 (1967); also see, M. Tinkham, in Ref. 10, p. 288.
-
(1967)
Phys. Rev.
, vol.164
, pp. 498
-
-
Langer, J.S.1
Ambegaokar, V.2
|