A randomized, double-blind comparison between parecoxib sodium and propacetamol for parenteral postoperative analgesia after inguinal hernia repair in adult patients

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 100, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1309-1315

  Beaussier, M ^a   Weickmans, H ^a   Paugam, C ^a   Lavazais, S ^b   Baechle, J P ^c   Goater, P ^d   Buffin, A ^e   Loriferne, J F ^f   Perier, J F ^g   Didelot, J P ^h   Mosbah, A ⁱ   Said, R ⁱ   Lienhart, A ^a  

^a HÔPITAL SAINT ANTOINE   (France)

^b POITIERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c Clinique de la Sauvegarde   (France)

^d University of Paris Descartes   (France)

^e CHU Annecy   (France)

^f Hôpital Ste Camille   (France)

^g HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

^h CHU NANCY BRABOIS   (France)

ⁱ SAHLOUL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATRACURIUM; DESFLURANE; FENTANYL; HYDROXYZINE; ISOFLURANE; MORPHINE; MORPHINE SULFATE; PARECOXIB; PROPACETAMOL; PROPOFOL; SEVOFLURANE; SUFENTANIL;

ADULT; ALLERGY; ARTICLE; BRADYCARDIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUGHING; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG USE; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEADACHE; HEMATOMA; HERNIOPLASTY; HUMAN; INGUINAL HERNIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALAISE; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NAUSEA; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRURITUS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; URINE RETENTION; VOMITING;

ACETAMINOPHEN; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTS, NON-STEROIDAL; CYCLOOXYGENASE INHIBITORS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HERNIA, INGUINAL; HUMANS; ISOXAZOLES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORPHINE; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 20244370213     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000150972.88708.13     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. White PF. The role of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of pain after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 2002;94:577-85.
2. Fitzgerald GA, Patrono C. The coxibs, selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2. N Engl J Med 2001;345:433-42.
3. Ma H, Tang J, White PF, et al. Perioperative rofecoxib improves early recovery after outpatient herniorrhaphy. Anesth Analg 2004;98:970-5.
4. Jarde O, Boccard E. Parenteral versus oral route increases paracetamol efficacy. Clin Drug Invest 1997;14:474-81.
5. Cheer S, Goa K. Parecoxib (parecoxib sodium). Drugs 2001;61:1133-41.
6. Talley JJ, Bertenshaw SR, Carter JS, et al. N-[[(5-methyl-3- phenylisocazol-4-Yl)-phenyl]sulfonyl] propanamide, sodium salt, parecoxib sodium: a potent selective inhibitor of Cox-2 for parenteral administration. J Med Chem 2000;43:1661-3.
7. Fricke J, Varkalis J, Zwillich S, et al. Valdecoxib is more efficacious than rofecoxib in relieving pain associated with oral surgery. Am J Ther 2002;9:89-97.
8. Barton S, Langeland F, Snabes M, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous parecoxib sodium in relieving acute postoperative pain following gynecologic laparotomy surgery. Anesthesiology 2002;96:306-14.
9. Rasmusen G, Steckner K, Hogue C, et al. Intravenous parecoxib sodium for acute pain after orthopedic knee surgery. Am J Orthop 2002;31:336-43.
10. Noveck R, Laurent A, Kuss M, et al. Parecoxib sodium does not impair platelet function in healthy elderly and non-elderly individuals: two randomised, controlled trials. Clin Drug Invest 2001;21:465-76.
11. Stoltz R, Harris S, Kuss M, et al. Upper GI mucosal effects of parecoxib sodium in healthy elderly subjects. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:65-71.
12. Depre M, van Hecken A, Verbesselt R, et al. Tolerance and pharmacokinetic of propacetamol, a paracetamol formulation for intravenous use. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 1992;6:259-62.
13. Chandrasekharan NV, Dai H, Roos KL, et al. COX 3, a cyclooxygenase variant inhibited by acetaminophen and other analgesic/antipyretic drugs: cloning, structure and expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:13926-31.
14. Dahl V, Raeder JC. Non-opioid postoperative analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000;44:1191-203.
15. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. Numerical recipes in Fortran 77: the art of scientific computing. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
16. Delbos A, Boccard E. Morphine sparing effect of propacetamol after ligamentoplasty of the knee. J Pain Symptom Manage 1995;10:279-86.
17. Harrison C, Morris S, Harvey J. Effect of ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block and wound infiltration with 0.5% bupivacaine on postoperative pain after hernia repair. Br J Anaesth 1994;72:691-3.
18. Rawal N, Hylander J, Nydahl PA, et al. Survey of postoperative analgesia following ambulatory surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997;41:1017-22.
19. Delacroix P, Kenesi C, Stoppa R. Evaluation of analgesic efficacy of propacetamol versus placebo in patients with postoperative pain. Semin Hop Paris 1985;61:2739-42.
20. Ang ET, Goldfarb G, Boccard E. Analgesic efficacy of propacetamol hydrochlorate 2 g versus pentazocine 30 mg after orthopedic surgery. Eur J Pain 1990;11:137-42.
21. Romsig J, Moiniche S, Dahl JB. Rectal and parenteral paracetamol, and paracetamol in combination with NSAIDs, for postoperative analgesia. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:215-26.
22. Tang J, Li S, White P, et al. Effect of parecoxib, a novel intravenous cyclooxygenase type-2 inhibitor, on the postoperative opioid requirement and quality of pain control. Anesthesiology 2002;96:1305-9.
23. Daniels S, Grossman E, Kuss M, et al. A double-blind, randomized comparison of intramuscularly and intravenously administered parecoxib sodium versus ketorolac and placebo in a post-oral surgery pain model. Clin Ther 2001;23:1018-31.
24. Hyllested M, Jones S, Pedersen JL, Kehlet H. Comparative effect of paracetamol, NSAIDs or their combination in postoperative pain management: a qualitative review. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:199-214.
25. Varassi G, Marinangeli F, Agro F, et al. A double-blinded evaluation of propacetamol versus ketorolac in combination with patient-controlled analgesia morphine: analgesic efficacy and tolerability after gynecologic surgery. Anesth Analg 1999;88:611-6.
26. Zhou T, Tang J, White P. Propacetamol versus ketorolac for treatment of acute postoperative pain after total hip or knee replacement. Anesth Analg 2001;92:1569-75.
27. Issioui T, Klein K, White P, et al. Cost-efficacy of rofecoxib versus acetaminophen for preventing pain after ambulatory surgery. Anesthesiology 2002;97:931-7.
28. Watcha M, Issioui T, Klein K, White PF. Costs and effectiveness of rofecoxib, celecoxib and acetaminophen for preventing pain after ambulatory otolaryngologic surgery. Anesth Analg 2003;96:987-94.
29. Striebel HW, Scheitza W, Philippi W, et al. Quantifying oral analgesic consumption using a novel method and comparison with patient-controlled intravenous analgesic consumption. Anesth Analg 1998;86:1051-3.
30. Pinnock CA, Derbyshire DR, Achola KJ, Smith G. Absorption of controlled release morphine sulphate in the immediate postoperative period. Br J Anaesth 1986;58:868-71.
31. McCormack JP, Warriner B, Levine M, Glick N. A comparison of regularly dosed oral morphine and on-demand intramuscular morphine in the treatment of postsurgical pain. Can J Anaesth 1993;40:819-24.
32. Kalso E, Vainio A. Morphine and oxycodone hydrochloride in the management of cancer pain. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1990;47:639-46.
33. Gan T, Joshi G, Viscusi E, et al. Preoperative parenteral parecoxib and follow-up oral valdecoxib reduce length of stay and improve quality of patient recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. Anesth Analg 2004;98:1665-73.
34. Yermakova A, O'Banion MK. Cyclooxygenases in the central nervous system: implication for treatment of neurological disorders. Curr Pharm Des 2000;6:1755-76.