|
|
|
Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages
|
|
A collision of disparate forces may be reshaping American law.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CONFLICT;
CRUZAN V. DIRECTOR, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
HUMAN;
IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF SCHIAVO;
IN RE QUINLAN;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
POLITICS;
POPULAR APPROACH/SOURCE;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
CRUZAN V. DIRECTOR, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF SCHIAVO;
IN RE QUINLAN;
LEGAL APPROACH;
POPULAR APPROACH/SOURCE;
DISSENT AND DISPUTES;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FLORIDA;
HUMANS;
POLITICS;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL VALUES;
UNITED STATES;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
|
EID: 20144379968
PISSN: 03624331
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (2)
|
|
References (0)
|
