Comparison of diagnostic findings using different olfactory test methods

Laryngoscope

Volumn 115, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1114-1117

  Tsukatani, Toshiaki ^a,b   Reiter, Evan R ^a   Miwa, Takaki ^a,b   Costanzo, Richard M ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Anosmia; Olfactory function; Smell test

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANOSMIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONNECTICUT CHEMOSENSORY CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER TEST; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JAPAN; JET STREAM OLFACTOMETER TEST; MALE; OLFACTOMETER; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SMELLING; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OLFACTION DISORDERS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SMELL;

EID: 20144378001     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000163754.16475.43     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Cain WS, Gent JF, Goodspeed RB, Leonard G. Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center. Laryngoscope 1988;98:83-88.
2. Ikeda K, Tabata K, Oshima T, et al. Unilateral examination of olfactory threshold using the Jet Stream Olfactometer. Auris Nasus Larynx 1999;26:435-439.
3. Takagi SF. Olfactory Tests. Human Olfaction. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press, 1989:35-69.
4. Doty RL, Shaman P, Kimmelman CP, Dann MS. University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a rapid quantitative olfactory function test for the clinic. Laryngoscope 1984;94:176-178.
5. Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M, et al. Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2000;257:205-211.
6. Doty RL, McKeown DA, Lee WW, Shaman P. A study of the test-retest reliability often olfactory tests. Chem Senses 1995;20:645-656.
7. Oyama M, Furuta S, Takasaka T, et al. Clinical evaluation of usefulness of smell identification test (International version) in Japanese elderly subjects. Jpn J Rhinol 1996;34:340-347.
8. Kondo H, Matsuda T, Hashiba M, Baba S. A study of the relationship between the T&T olfactometer and the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in a Japanese population. Am J Rhinol 1998;12:353-358.
9. Doty RL, Smith R, McKeown DA, Raj J. Tests of human olfactory function: principal components analysis suggests that most measure a common source of variance. Percept Psychophys 1994;56:701-707.
10. Bonfils P, Faulcon P, Avan P. Screening of olfactory function using the Biolfa olfactory test: investigations in patients with dysosmia. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:1063-1071.
11. Kobayashi M, Nishida K, Nakamura S, et al. Suitability of the odor stick identification test for the Japanese in patients suffering from olfactory disturbance. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2004;553:74-79.