Analysis of sex-linked sequences supports a new mammal species in Europe

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 14, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 2025-2031

  Hellborg, Linda ^a   Gündüz, Islam ^b,c   Jaarola, Maarit ^c  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cryptic species; Field vole (Microtus agrestis); Speciation; X chromosome; Y chromosome

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PRIMER DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARVICOLINAE; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; EUROPE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SEX CHROMOSOME; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; ARVICOLINAE; BASE SEQUENCE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EUROPE; GEOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEX CHROMOSOMES; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

MAMMALIA; MICROTUS AGRESTIS; MURIDAE;

EID: 20144363811     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02559.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ashley T, Jaarola M, Fredga K (1989) The behavior during pachynema of a normal and an inverted Y chromosome in Microtus agrestis. Hereditas, 111, 281-294.
2. Avise JC (2000) Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
3. Avise JC, Walker D (1999) Species realities and numbers in sexual vertebrates: perspectives from an asexually transmitted genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 992-995.
4. Avise JC, Wollenberg K (1997) Phylogenetics and the origin of species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 7748-7755.
5. Barlow KE, Jones, G, Barratt EM (1997) Can skull morphology be used to predict ecological relationships between bat species? A test using two cryptic species of pipistrelle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 264, 1695-1700.
6. Barratt EM, Deaville R, Burland TM et al. (1997) DNA answers call of pipistrelle bat species. Nature, 387, 138-139.
7. Baum D, Shaw KL (1995) Genealogical perspectives on the species problem. In: Experimental and Molecular Approaches to Plant Biosystematics (eds Hoch PC, Stephenson AC), pp. 289-303. Missouri Botanical Gardens, St. Louis, Missouri.
8. Bradley RD, Baker RJ (2001) A test of the genetic species concept: cytochrome b sequences and mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 82, 960-973.
9. Chaline J, Brunet-Lecomte P, Montuire S, Viriot L, Courant F (1999) Anatomy of the arvicoline radiation (Rodentia): palaeogeographical, palaeoecological history and evolutionary data. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 36, 239-267.
10. Gregory SG, Sekhon M, Schein J et al. (2002) A physical map of the mouse genome. Nature, 418, 743-U3.
11. Hammer MF, Blackmer F, Garrigan D, Nachman MW, Wilder JA (2003) Human population structure and its effects on sampling Y chromosome sequence variation. Genetics, 164, 1495-1509.
12. Hausser J, Jammot D (1974) Étude biométriqueś des mâchoires chez les Sorex du groupe araneus en Europe continentale (Mammalia, Insectivora). Mammalia, 38, 324-343.
13. Hellborg L, Ellegren H (2003) Y chromosome conserved anchored tagged sequences (YCATS) for the analysis of mammalian male-specific DNA. Molecular Ecology, 12, 283-291.
14. Hellborg L, Ellegren H (2004) Low levels of nucleotide diversity in mammalian Y chromosomes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 21, 158-163.
15. Hey J, Machado CA (2003) The study of structured populations - new hope for a difficult and divided science. Nature Reviews Genetics, 4, 535-543.
16. Hudson RR, Coyne JA (2002) Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept. Evolution, 56, 1557-1565.
17. Hudson RR, Turelli M (2003) Stochasticity overrules the 'three-times rule': genetic drift, genetic draft, and coalescence times for nuclear loci versus mitochondrial DNA. Evolution, 57, 182-190.
18. Jaarola M, Searle JB (2002) Phylogeography of field voles (Microtus agrestis) in Eurasia inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2613-2621.
19. Jaarola M, Searle JB (2004) A highly divergent mitochondrial DNA lineage of Microtus agrestis in southern Europe. Heredity, 92, 229-234.
20. Jaarola M, Tegelström H (1995) Colonization history of north European field voles (Microtus agrestis) revealed by mitochondrial DNA. Molecular Ecology, 4, 299-310.
21. Jaarola M, Tegelström H, Fredga K (1997) A contact zone with noncoincident clines for sex-specific markers in the field vole (Microtus agrestis). Evolution, 51, 241-249.
22. Jaarola M, Martínková N, Gündüz I et al. (2004) Molecular phylogeny of the speciose vole genus Microtus (Arvicolinae, Rodentia) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 33, 647-663.
23. Jobling MA, Tyler-Smith C (2003) The human Y chromosome: an evolutionary marker comes of age. Nature Reviews Genetics, 4, 598-612.
24. Kaessman H, Wiebe V, Pääbo S (1999) Extensive nuclear DNA sequence diversity among chimpanzees. Science, 286, 1159-1162.
25. Kaessman H, Wiebe V, Weiss G, Pääbo S (2001) Great ape DNA sequences reveal a reduced diversity and an expansion in humans. Nature Genetics, 27, 155-156.
26. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16, 111-120.
27. Maddison DR, Maddison WP (2000) MACCMDE 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
28. Mayer F, von Helversen O (2001) Cryptic diversity in European bats. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 268, 1825-1832.
29. Mayr E (1942) Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
30. Mitchell-Jones AJ, Amori G, Bogdanowicz W et al. (1999) The Atlas of European Mammals. Poyser, London.
31. Musser GG, Carleton MD (1993) Family Muridae. In: Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (eds Wilson DE, Reeder DM), pp. 510-756. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
32. Nachman MW (1997) Patterns of DNA variability at X-linked loci in Mus domesticus. Genetics, 147, 1303-1316.
33. Nachman MW (1998) Y chromosome variation of mice and men. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 15, 1744-1750.
34. Nachman MW, Aquadro CF (1994) Polymorphism and divergence at the 5′ flanking region of the sex-determining locus, Sry, in mice. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 11, 539-547.
35. Nei M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.
36. Nei M, Li W-H (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 76, 5269-5273.
37. Nichols R (2001) Gene trees and species trees are not the same. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 358-364.
38. Omland KE, Tarr CL, Boarma WI, Marzluff JM, Fleischer RC (2000) Cryptic genetic variation and paraphyly in ravens. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 267, 2475-2482.
39. Petit E, Balloux F, Excoffier L (2002) Mammalian population genetics: why not Y? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 28-33.
40. Richmond GM (1996) The INQUA-approved provisional Lower Middle Pleistocene boundary. In: The Early Middle Pleistocene in Europe (ed. Turner C), pp. 319-327. Balkema, Rotterdam.
41. Riddle BR, Hafner DJ, Alexander LF, Jaeger JR (2000) Cryptic vicariance in the historical assembly of a Baja California Peninsular Desert biota. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 19, 14438-14443.
42. Roca AL, Georgiadis N, Pecon-Slattery J, O'Brien SJ (2001) Genetic evidence for two species of elephant in Africa. Science, 293, 1473-1477.
43. Rosenberg NA, Nordborg M (2002) Genealogical trees, coalescent theory and the analysis of genetic polymorphisms. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, 380-390.
44. Rozas J, Rozas R (1999) DNASP (Version 3): an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics, 15, 174-175.
45. Schaffner SF (2004) The X chromosome in population genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5, 43-51.
46. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) ARLEQUIN 2.0. A Software for Population Genetic Data Analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Department of Anthropology, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
47. Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P (2001) A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. American Journal of Human Genetics, 68, 978-989.
48. Stone AC, Griffiths RC, Zegura SL, Hammer MF (2002) High levels of Y-chromosome nucleotide diversity in the genus Pan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 43-48.
49. Swofford DL (1998) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
50. Tosi AJ, Morales JC, Melnick DJ (2003) Paternal, maternal and biparental molecular markers provide unique windows onto the evolutionary history of macaque monkeys. Evolution, 57, 1419-1435.
51. Watterson GA (1975) On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theoretical Population Biology, 7, 256-276.