Aharonov-Bohm oscillations in a quantum ring: Eccentricity and electric-field effects

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 71, Issue 12, 2005, Pages

  Bruno Alfonso, A ^a   Latge A ^b  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; ELECTRIC ACTIVITY; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTROSTIMULATION; ENERGY ABSORPTION; ENERGY TRANSFER; OSCILLATORY POTENTIAL; QUANTUM MECHANICS;

EID: 20044393897     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.125312     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. S. Viefers, P. Koskinen, P. S. Deo, and M. Manninen, Physica E (Amsterdam) 21, 1 (2004).
2. A. Bruno-Alfonso and A. Latgé, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15 887 (2000).
3. Z. Barticevic, M. Pacheco, and A. Latgé, Phys. Rev. B 62, 6963 (2000).
4. A. Fuhrer, S. Lüscher, T. Ihn, T. Heinzel, K. Ensslin, W. Wegscheider, and M. Bichler, Nature (London) 413, 822 (2001).
5. M. Bayer, M. Korkusinski, P. Hawrylak, T. Gutbrod, M. Michel, and A. Forchel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 186801 (2003).
6. D. Berman, O. Entin-Wohlman, and M. Ya. Azbel, Phys. Rev. B 42, 9299 (1990).
7. L. I. Magarill, D. A. Romanov, and A. V. Chaplik, JETP 83, 361 (1996).
8. Z. Barticevic, G. Fuster, and M. Pacheco, Phys. Rev. B 65, 193307 (2002).
9. J. M. Llorens, C. Trallero-Giner, A. Garcia-Cristobal, and A. Cantarero, Phys. Rev. B 64, 035309 (2001).
10. L. A. Lavenère-Wanderley, A. Bruno-Alfonso, and A. Latgé, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 259 (2002).
11. D. Gridin, A. T. I. Adamou, and R. V. Craster, Phys. Rev. B 69, 155317 (2004).
12. I. J. Clark and A. J. Bracken, J. Phys. A 29, 339 (1996).
13. L. I. Magarill and M. V. Étnin, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 96, 766 (2003).
14. L. Chaos-Cador and E. Ley-Koo, Rev. Mex. Fis. 48, 67 (2002).
15. J. C. Gutiérrez-Vega, R. M. Rodríguez-Dagnino, M. A. Meneses-Nava, and S. Chávez-Cerda, Am. J. Phys. 71, 233 (2003).
16. J. C. Slater, Phys. Rev. 87, 807 (1952).
17. There is a mistype in the second term of Eq. (21) in Ref. 10. The authors wrote the number 6 instead of the correct value 2.