Cognitive functions and self-rating of competency in outpatient neurological-neuropsychological rehabilitation;Kognitive funktionen und selbsteinschätzung der alltags- kompetenz in der ambulanten neurologisch-neuropsychologischen rehabilitation

Zeitschrift fur Neuropsychologie

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 281-289

  Geyh, Szilvia ^a   Wendel, Claudia ^b   Heel, Sabine ^b   Fries, Wolfgang ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b Praxis für neurologisch neuropsychologische Rehabilitation Prof Dr med W Fries   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive functions; Competency self rating; ICF (International Classification of Functioning); Outpatient rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

EID: 20044385182     PISSN: 1016264X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024//1016-264X.13.4.281     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aschenbrenner, S., Tucha, O. &Lange, K.W. (2001). Regensburger Wortflüssigkeits-Test. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
2. Beckers, K., Netz, J. &Hömberg, V. (1999). The measurement of outcome in day care neurological rehabilitation: Discrepancies between changes in FIM and Barthel scores and achievement of treatment goals. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 9, 437-446.
3. Benton, A.L., Hamsher, K. de S., Varney, N.R. &Spreen, O. (1983). Contributions to neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Bochmann, E. (1998). Evaluation in der Neuropsychologie. In E. Kasten, G. Schmid & R. Eder (Hrsg.), Effektive neuropsychologische Behandlungsmethoden (S.11-38). Bonn: Deutscher Psychologen Verlag.
5. Cavallo, M.M., Kay, T. &Ezrachi, O. (1992). Problems and changes after traumatic brain injury: Differing perceptions within and between families. Brain Injury, 6, 327-335.
6. Chua, K.S. &Kong, K.H. (1999). Rehabilitation outcome following traumatic brain injury-the Singapore experience. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 22, 189-197.
7. Fordyce, D.J. &Roueche, J.R. (1986). Changes in perspectives of disability among patients, staff, and relatives during rehabilitation of brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 31, 217-229.
8. Gauggel, S. (1999). Marburger Kompetenz Skala. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.
9. Gauggel, S., Peleska, B. &Bode, R.K. (2000). Relationship between cognitive Impairments and rated activity restrictions in stroke patients. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15, 710-723.
10. Granger, C.V., Hamilton, B.B. &Sherwin, F.S. (1986). Guide for the use of the uniform data set for medical rehabilitation. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation Project Office, Buffalo General Hospital, New York 14203, USA.
11. Greenwood, R. (1999). The consequences of brain injury: Classification and assessment of outcome. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 9, 231-240.
12. Grimby, G., Gudjonsson, G., Rodhe, M., Sunnerhagen, K.S., Sundh, V. &Östensson, M.L. (1996). The functional independence measure in Sweden: Experience for outcome measurement in rehabilitation medicine. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 28, 51-62.
13. Hajek, V.E., Gagnon, S. &Ruderman, J.E. (1997). Cognitive and functional assessments of stroke patients: An analysis of their relation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 1331-1337.
14. Ilmberger, J. (1988). Münchner Verbaler Gedächtnistest. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.
15. Kaplan, C.P. &Corrigan, J.D. (1994). The relationship between cognition and functional independence in adults with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 643-647.
16. Klix, F. &Rautenstrauch-Göde, K. (1967). Struktur-und Komponentenanalyse von Problemlösungsprozessen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 174, 167-193.
17. Knapp, P. &Hewison, J. (1999). Disagreement in patient and carer assessment of functional abilities after stroke. Stroke, 30, 934-938.
18. Mahoney, F.I. &Barthel, D.W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61-65.
19. Neese, L.E., Caroselli, J.S., Klaas, P., High, W.M., Becker, L.J. &Scheibel, R.S. (2000). Neuropsychological assessment and the Disability Rating Scale (DRS): A concurrent validity study. Brain Injury, 14, 719-724.
20. Oswald, W.D. &Roth, E. (1978). Der Zahlen-Verbindungs-Test (ZVT). Ein sprachfreier Intelligenz-Schnell-Test. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
21. Prigatano, G.P. &Altman, I.M. (1990). Impaired awareness of behavioral limitations after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 71, 1058-1064.
22. Roth, E.J., Heinemann, A.W., Lovell, L.L., Harvey, R.L., McGuire, J.R. &Diaz, S. (1998). Impairment and disability: Their relation during stroke rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 329-335.
23. Schuntermann, M.F. (2000). Die internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit und Behinderung (ICIDH-2) der Weltgesundheitsorganisation. In W. Fries & C. Wendel (Hrsg.), Ambulante Komplex-Behandlung von hirnverletzten Patienten (S.52-59). München: W. Zuckerschwerdt.
24. Semlyen, J.K., Summers, S.J. &Barnes, M.P. (1998). Traumatic brain injury: Efficacy of multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 678-683.
25. Sherer, M., Bergloff, P., Levin, E., High, W.M., Oden, K.E. &Nick, T.G. (1998). Impaired awareness and employment outcome after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 13, 52-61.
26. Smith-Knapp, K., Corrigan, J.D. &Arnett, J.A. (1996). Predicting functional independence from neuropsychological tests following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 10, 651-661.
27. Tewes, U. (1991). Hamburg-Wechsler Intelligenztest für Erwachsene-Revision 1991. Bern: Huber.
28. Wade, D.T. (1992). Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. World Health Organization. (2001). ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
30. Zimmermann, P. &Fimm, B. (1994). Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung (TAP). Unveröffentlichtes Computerprogramm.