Ethical issues faced by nursing editors

Western Journal of Nursing Research

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 487-499

  Freda, Margaret Comerford ^a   Kearney, Margaret H ^b  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Editorial policies; Ethics; Medical publishing; Standards

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ADULT; ADVERTIZING; AGED; CONTROLLED STUDY; E-MAIL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NURSING; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; REVIEW; SOCIETY; WRITING;

ADULT; ADVERTISING; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; AUTHORSHIP; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DUPLICATE PUBLICATION; EDITORIAL POLICIES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE ADMINISTRATORS; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS; PLAGIARISM; PUBLISHING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 20044382277     PISSN: 01939459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0193945905274906     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Amdur, R. J., & Biddle, C. (1997). Institutional review board approval and publication of human research results. Journal of the American Medical Association, 271, 909-914.
2. American Nurses Association. (2001). Code of ethics. Retrieved December 15, 2004, from www.nursingworld.org/ethics/code/ethicscode150.htm#1.1
3. Asai, T., & Shingu, K. (1999). Ethical considerations in anaesthesia journals. Anaesthesia, 54, 108-109.
4. Bevan, J. C. (2002). Ethical behaviour of authors in biomedical journalism. Annals of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 35, 81-85.
5. Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Rhomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., et al. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: Views of researchers in a British medical faculty. British Medical Journal, 324, 1009-1012.
6. Callaham, M. L. (2003). Journal policy on ethics in scientific publications. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 41, 82-89.
7. Committee on Publication Ethics. (2003). Guidelines on good publication practice. The COPE report. Retrieved December 15, 2004, from www.publicationethics.org.uk/about/
8. Davis, R., & Mullner, M. (2002). Editorial independence at medical journals owned by professional associations: A survey of editors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8, 513-528.
9. Freda, M. C., & Kearney, M. H. (2005). An international survey of nurse editors' roles and practices. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37(1).
10. Horton, R. (1998). The journal ombudsperson: A step toward scientific press oversight. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 298-299.
11. Kempers, R. D. (2001). Ethical issues in biomedical publications. Human Fertility, 4, 261-266.
12. King, C., McGuire, D., Longman, A., & Carroll-Johnson, R. (1997). Peer review, authorship, ethics and conflict of interest. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 29, 163-167.
13. Krimsky, S., & Rothenberg, L. (2001). Conflict of interest policies in science and medical journals: Editorial practices and author disclosures. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 205-218.
14. Mason, D. (2004, August). Hot topics in publishing. Paper presented at a meeting of the International Academy of Nursing Editors, Nassau, The Bahamas.
15. Morgan, D. L. (1993). Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research, 3, 112-121.
16. Pitkin, R. (1998). Ethical and quasi-ethical issues in medical editing and publishing. Croatian Medical Journal, 39, 95-101.
17. Yank, V., & Barnes, D. (2003). Consensus and contention regarding redundant publications in clinical research: Cross sectional survey of editors and authors. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29, 109-114.