A hybrid approach for quantification of aortic valve stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 581-586

  Haghi, Dariusch ^a   Papavassiliu, Theano ^a   Kalmar, Gabor ^a   Schroder, Meike ^a   Neff, Wolfgang ^a   Kaden, Jens J ^a   Muller, Ute ^a   Haase, Karl K ^a   Borggrefe, Martin ^a   Suselbeck, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aortic stenosis; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; Echocardiography; Hybrid approach

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; CALCIFICATION; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE OUTFLOW TRACT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; STROKE VOLUME;

EID: 20044380745     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/JCMR-200060644     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Zoghbi WA, Farmer KL, Soto JG, Nelson JG, Quinones MA. Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 1986; 73:452-459.
2. Oh JK, Taliercio CP, Holmes DR Jr, Reeder GS, Bailey KR, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11:1227-1234.
3. Otto CM, Pearlman AS, Comess KA, Reamer RP, Janko CL, Huntsman LL. Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7:509-517.
4. Skjaerpe T, Hegrenaes L, Hatle L. Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1985; 72:810-818.
5. Currie PJ, Hagler DJ, Seward JB, Reeder GS, Fyfe DA, Bove AA, Tajik AJ. Instantaneous pressure gradient: a simultaneous Doppler and dual catheter correlative study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7:800-806.
6. Dumont Y, Arsenault M. An alternative to standard continuity equation for the calculation of aortic valve area by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16:1309-1315.
7. Tribouilloy C, Shen WF, Peltier M, Mirode A, Rey JL, Lesbre JP. Quantitation of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis with multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: comparison with monoplane transesophageal approach. Am Heart J 1994; 128:526-532.
8. Okura H, Yoshida K, Hozumi T, Akasaka T, Yoshikawa J. Planimetry and transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in noninvasive assessment of aortic valve area in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30:753-759.
9. Smith LA, Cowell SJ, White AC, Boon NA, Newby DE, Northridge DB. Contrast agent increases Doppler velocities and improves reproducibility of aortic valve area measurements in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004; 17:247-252.
10. Kupfahl C, Honold M, Meinhardt G, Vogelsberg H, Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Sechtem U. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques. Heart 2004; 90:893-901.
11. Friedrich MG, Schulz-Menger J, Poetsch T, Pilz B, Uhlich F, Dietz R. Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 2002; 144:329-334.
12. John AS, Dill T, Brandt RR, Rau M, Ricken W, Bachmann G, Hamm CW. Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42:519-526.
13. Caruthers SD, Lin SJ, Brown P, Watkins MP, Williams TA, Lehr KA, Wickline SA. Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography. Circulation 2003; 108:2236-2243.
14. Ahmed S, Shellock FG. Magnetic resonance imaging safety: implications for cardiovascular patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2001; 3:171-182.
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310.
16. Myreng Y, Molstad P, Endresen K, Ihlen H. Reproducibility of echocardiographic estimates of the area of stenosed aortic valves using the continuity equation. Int J Cardiol 1990; 26:349-359.
17. Zhou YQ, Faerestrand S, Matre K. Velocity distributions in the left ventricular outflow tract in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. Effect on the measurement of aortic valve area by using the continuity equation. Eur Heart J 1995; 16:383-393.
18. Gopal AS, Shen Z, Sapin PM, Keller AM, Schnellbaecher MJ, Leibowitz DW, Akinboboye OO, Rodney RA, Blood DK, King DL. Assessment of cardiac function by three-dimensional echocardiography compared with conventional noninvasive methods. Circulation 1995; 92:842-853.
19. Sapin PM, Schroder KM, Gopal AS, Smith MD, DeMaria AN, King DL. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional echocardiography with cineventriculography for measurement of left ventricular volume in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24:1054-1063.
20. Blumberg FC, Pfeifer M, Holmer SR, Kromer EP, Riegger GA, Elsner D. Quantification of aortic stenosis in mechanically ventilated patients using multiplane transesophageal Doppler echocardiography. Chest 1998; 114:94-97.
21. Pennell DJ. Ventricular volume and mass by CMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2002; 4:507-513.