Public-private partnership in urban regeneration: A comparison of Dutch and Spanish PPPs

European Journal of Housing Policy

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-16

  van Boxmeer, Brechtje ^a   van Beckhoven, Ellen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Public private partnership; Spain; The Netherlands; Urban regeneration

Indexed keywords

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP; URBAN RENEWAL;

BENELUX; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN; WESTERN EUROPE; WORLD;

EID: 20044373490     PISSN: 14616718     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14616710500055612     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aalbers, M., van Beckhoven, E., van Kempen, R., Mustend, S. & Ostendorf, W. (2003) Large Housing Estates in the Netherlands, Overview of Developments and Problems in Amsterdam and Utrecht, RESTATE report 2e (Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University).
2. Akkerman, T. (2003) Political responsiveness and public participation, pp. 85-102 in: J. Font (Ed) Public Participation and Local Governance (Barcelona: Institut de Ciencies Polítiques i Socials, Universit at Autonoma Barcelona).
3. Akro Consult (1999) PPS 2000+, Terugblik en toekomstperspectief IPPP 2000+, Retrospect and Perspective] (Den Haag: Akro Consult).
4. Bailey, N., Barker, A. & Macdonald, K. (1995) Partnership Agencies in British Urban Policy (London: UCL Press).
5. Beckhoven, E. van, Boxmeer, B. van & Garcia Ferrando, L. (in press) Local participation in Spain and the Netherlands, in: R. van Kempen, S. Hall, I. Tosics & K. Dekker (Eds) Large Housing Estates in Europe: Policies, Practices and Visions for Sustainable Neighbourhoods and Cities.
6. Beckhoven, E. van, Boxmeer, B. van & Kempen, R. van (2004) Partnerships in Problem Neighborhoods: Success or Failure? A Case Study in Utrecht: The Netherlands. Paper presented on City Futures Conference in Chicago, 8-10 July.
7. Berenschot (2002) Wijkontwikkelingsmaatschappijen: samenwerkingsverbanden in de herstructurering [Development Companies: Cooperation in Regeneration]. Rapportage nulmeting [first report], Utrecht.
8. Boxmeer, B. van (2001) Wijken voor de toekomst [Neighbourhoods for the Future], Master's thesis, Eindhoven Technical University.
9. Boxmeer, B. van (2002) Urban Regeneration in Spain and the Netherlands, a Comparison Concerning Housing Market, Policy and Actor (Barcelona: University of Barcelona), available on: www.kei-centrum.nl
10. Buildingbusiness (2000) Dossier Stedelijke Vernieuwing [File of Urban Regeneration]. Vol. 5, pp. 44-81.
11. Ciutat Vella (2002) Información del districto más emblemático de Barcelona. [Information of the Most Symbolic District of Barcelona]. El Periódico, Special Issue, 30 November.
12. Counch, F., Fraser, C. & Percy, S. (2003) Urban Regeneration in Europe (Oxford: Blackwell Science).
13. Centraal Plan Bureau (CPB) (2001) PPS: een uitdagend huwelijk, Publiek-Private samenwerking bij Combinatieprojecten [PPP: A Challenging Marriage, Public Private Partnerships in Combination Projects (Den Haag: Centraal Planbureau).
14. Dieleman, F. M. (1996) The quiet revolution in Dutch housing policy, Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 87(3), pp. 275-282.
15. Dieleman, F. M. (1999) Policy review: the impact of housing policy changes on housing associations: experiences in the Netherlands, Housing Studies, 14(2), pp. 251-259.
16. Elander, I. (2002) Partnerships and urban governance, International Social Science Journal, 54(2), pp. 191-204.
17. Friedrichs, J. & Vranken, J. (2001) European urban governance in fragmented societies, in: H.T. Andersen & R. van Kempen (Eds) Governing European Cities. Social Fragmentation, Social Exclusion and Urban Governance, pp. 19-40 (Aldershot: Ashgate).
18. Hastings, A. 1996. 'Unravelling the Process of 'Partnership' in Urban Regeneration Policy'. Urban Studies, 33(2), 253-268.
19. Heeren, S. von (2002) La remodelación de Ciutat Vella, un análisis crítico del modelo Barcelona [The Regeneration of Ciutat Vella, a Critical Análisis of the Barcelona Mmodel], (Barcelona: Veïen en Defensa de la Barcelona Vella).
20. Keicentrum stedelijke vernieuwing (2001) Verslag KEI-Atelier 'Martpartijen' [Report of KEI-workshop 'Private Parties'], (Rotterdam: Keicentrum stedelijke vernieuwing).
21. Kempen, R. van & H. Priemus (2002) Revolution in social housing in the Netherlands: possible effects of new housing policies, Urban Studies , 39(2), pp. 237-253.
22. Kooiman, J. (1993) Modern Governance: New Government-society Interactions (London: Sage).
23. Kruythoff, H. M. & Pareja Eastaway, M. (2000) Sociaal beleid in een kopersmarkt [Social policy in an owners' market], Tijdschrift voor de volkshuisvesting, 3, pp. 29-34.
24. Mackintosh, M. (1992) Partnership: issues of policy and negotiation, Local Economy, (7), pp. 210-224.
25. Masser, I. (1986) Some methodological considerations, in: I. Masser & R. Williams (Eds) Learning from Countries (Norwich: Geo Books).
26. Ministerie van VROM [Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning & Environment] (1997) Nota Stedelijke Vernieuwing [Memorandum on urban renewal], (The Hague: Ministerie van VROM).
27. Ministerie van VROM [Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning & Enviromrientj (1998) Woningbehoefte Onderzoek 1998 [Research on the Need of Dwellings] (The Hague: Ministerie van VROM).
28. Navarro, V. (2000) Globalización econòmica, poder politico y Estado del bienestar [Globalisation of Economics, Political Power and Welfare Situation] (Barcelona: Ariel Sociedad Económica).
29. Pareja, M. (1999) The Metropolitan Region of Barcelona as an Example of Urban Network. An Analysis Regarding Residential Migrations and the Housing Marke (Barcelona: University of Barcelona).
30. Pareja, M. & Tapada T. (2001) Housing Imaginations, HSA Conference Cardiff, 4-5 September.
31. Pareja, M. & San Martín, I. (2002) The tenure imbalance in Spain: the need for social housing policy, Urban Studies, 39(2), pp. 283-295.
32. Pareja, M., Tapada, T., Boxmeer, B. van & Garcia, L. (2003) Large Housing Estates in Spain; Overview of Developments and Problems in Orcasitas, Simancas, Trinitat Nova and Sant Roc (Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University).
33. Pareja, M., Tapada, T., Boxmeer, B. van & Garcia, L. (2004) Large Housing Estates in Spain: Policies and Practice (Utrecht: Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University).
34. Priemus, H. (1995) How to abolish social housing? The Dutch case, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 19(1), pp. 145-155.
35. Priemus, H. (1996) Recent changes in the social rented sector in the Netherlands, Urban Studies, 33(10), pp. 1891-1908.
36. Quaderns (2001) Jornada sabre rehabilitació de centres urbans, edifics i habitatges [Conference on rehabilitación of urban centres, buildings and dwellings]. Sitges.
37. Remkes, J. W. & Pronk, J. (2000) Mensen-wensen-wonen. Nota Wonen in de 21e eeuw [People-wising-living, Memorandum on Housing in the 21st Century] (The Hague: Ministerie van VROM).
38. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1986) Power dependence. Theories of central-local relations. A critical reassessment, in: M. Goldsmith (Ed.) New Research in Central-Local Relations, pp. 1-33. (Aldershot: Gower).
39. Rosetti, N. & Gomà, R. (1998) Análisis de una política de regeneración urbana: el caso de Ciutat Vella (Barcelona) [Análisis of an urban regeneration policy: the case of Ciutat Vella (Barcelona)], in: B. Brugué & R. Gomà (Eds) Gobiernos locales y políticas públicas. [Local Governments and Public Policy], pp. 235-255. (Barcelona: Editoral Ariel, SA).
40. Stone, C. N. (1989). Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988 (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas).
41. Stuurgroep Experimenten Volkshuisvesting (SEV) (1999) Herontwikkeling naoorlogse wijken [Redevelopment of Neighbourhoods Built after the Second World War] (Rotterdam: SEV).
42. Walliser, A. (2003) Participación y ciudad (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Avan zados en Ciencias Socials).
43. www.cbs.nl (accessed July 2004)