Society's objectives for agro-landscapes as expressed in law

Land Use Policy

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 197-206

  Penker, Marianne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

Author keywords

Food supply chain; Landscape; Law; Objectives; Rural development

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; LEGISLATION; RURAL PLANNING;

AUSTRIA; CENTRAL EUROPE; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; WORLD;

EID: 20044370497     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BMWFK, 1995. Forschungskonzept Kulturlandschaftsforschung. Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst (BMWFK), Vienna.
2. Bossel H. Indicators for Sustainable Development: Theory, Method, Applications; a Report to the Balaton Group 1999 International Institute for Sustainable Development Winnipeg
3. Bozeman B. Public-value failure: When efficient markets may not do Public Administration Review 62 2 2002 145-161
4. Caldwell L.K. Landscape, law and public policy: Conditions for an ecological perspective Landscape Ecology 5 1 1990 3-8
5. CSD, 1996. Indicators of Sustainable Development: Framework and Methodologies. United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD). United Nations Publication, New York
6. Díez-Hochleitner, R., 2002. Preface of Vester, F., 2002: Die Kunst vernetzt zu denken. Ideen und Werkzeuge für einen neuen Umgang mit Komplexität. DTV, Munich.
7. Elster J. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences 1989 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
8. European Commission-EUROSTAT, 1997. Indicators of Sustainable Development: A Pilot Study following the Methodology of the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
9. Favry, E., Hiess, H., Payer, H., Penker, M., Schütz, O., Wytrzens, H.K., 2002. Fast Food-Slow Food: Lebensmittelwirtschaft und Kulturlandschaft. Synthesebericht. Forschungsprojekt im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur, Vienna.
10. Kaltenborn B.P. Bjerke T. Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences Landscape and Urban Planning 59 1 2002 1-11
11. Knoflacher H.M. Grundkonzept für ein kulturlandschaftbezogenes Interaktionsmodell In: Knoflacher H.M. (Ed.) Theorien und Modelle 1997 Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Verkehr Vienna
12. Maslow A. A theory of human motivation Psychological Review 50 1943 370-396
13. Moldan B. Sustainability Indicators: A Report on the Project on Indicators of Sustainable Development 1997 Wiley Chichester
14. Neef E. Die theoretischen Grundlagen der Landschaftslehre 1967 VEB Hermann Haack, Geographisch-Kartographische Anstalt Gotha/Leipzig
15. OECD, 2000. Towards sustainable development: Indicators to measure progress. Proceedings of the OECD Rome conference. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Publications, Paris.
16. SBU, 2003. Sensitivity Model. The Computerized System - Tools for a New Management of Complex Problems. Study group for Biology and Environment (SBU), Munich.
17. Scholz, R.W., Tietje, O., 2002. Embedded Case Study Methods. Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
18. Shields D.J. Solar S.V. Martin W.E. The role of values and objectives in communicating indicators of sustainability Ecological Indicators 2 2002 149-160
19. Umweltbundesamt, 1996. Testing of criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management within the international CIFOR project. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Jugend und Familie, Vienna.
20. UNCED, 1993. The earth summit. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), London, Boston, Graham & Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff, London.
21. Van Mansvelt J.D. An interdisciplinary approach to integrate a range of agro-landscape values as proposed by representatives of various disciplines Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 63 1997 233-250
22. Van Mansvelt J.D. Van der Lubbe M.J. Checklist for sustainable landscape management. Final report of the EU concerted action AIR-CT93-1210: The Landscape and Nature Production Capacity of Organic/Sustainable Types of Agriculture 1999 Elsevier Amsterdam
23. Vester F. Die Kunst vernetzt zu denken. Ideen und Werkzeuge für einen neuen Umgang mit Komplexität 7th Edition 2001 Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt Stuttgart
24. Von Wirén-Lehr S. Sustainability in agriculture - an evaluation of principal goal-oriented concepts to close the gap between theory and practice Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 84 2001 115-129
25. Wilson G.A. Buller H. The use of socio-economic and environmental indicators in assessing the effectiveness of EU Agri-environmental policy European Environment 11 2001 297-313
26. Wytrzens, H.K., Reichsthaler, R., 1990. Agrar-Umweltpolitik: agrarrelevante Konzeptionen der Umweltpolitik im Lichte anstehender Umweltprobleme der österreichischen Landwirtschaft. Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Vienna.
27. Wytrzens H.K. Penker M. Reiterer M. Tronner R. Wittich St. Der rechtsökologische Befund. Ein Instrument zur Erfassung von Landschaftswirkungen des Rechts 2001 Facultas Vienna