Field demonstration of DNAPL dehalogenation using emulsified zero-valent iron

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1309-1318

  Quinn, Jacqueline ^a   Geiger, Cherie ^b   Clausen, Chris ^b   Brooks, Kathleen ^b   Coon, Christina ^b   O'Hara, Suzanne ^c   Krug, Thomas ^c   Major, David ^c   Yoon, Woong Sang ^d   Gavaskar, Arun ^d   Holdsworth, Thomas ^e  

^a KENNEDY SPACE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^c GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS   (United States)

^d BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADATION; EMULSIFICATION; FLUXES; GROUNDWATER; IRON; SATURATION (MATERIALS COMPOSITION); SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; WATER TREATMENT;

BIODEGRADABLE EMULSION; DNAPL DEHALOGENATION; NANOSCALE EMULSIFIED ZERO-VALENT IRON (EZVI); TRICHLOROETHENE (TCE);

DEHALOGENATION;

1,2 DICHLOROETHYLENE; ETHYLENE; GROUND WATER; IRON; SURFACTANT; TRICHLOROETHYLENE; VINYL CHLORIDE; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; IRON; NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; REMEDIATION; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABILITY; DEHALOGENATION; EMULSION; LIQUID MEMBRANE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID; PARTICULATE MATTER; PH; SOIL ANALYSIS; WATER SAMPLING;

BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; EMULSIONS; IRON; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SOIL POLLUTANTS; SOLVENTS; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS; TRICHLOROETHYLENE; WATER POLLUTANTS;

EID: 20044369349     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es0490018     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. U.S. EPA. Cleanup of the Nation's Waste Sites: Markets and Technology Trends; EPA 542-R-96-005; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1997.
2. U.S. EPA Expert Panel on DNAPL Remediation. The DNAPL Remediation Challenge: Is There a Case for Source Depletion? EPA/600/R-03/143; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, December 2003.
3. Gillham, R. W.; O'Hannesin, S. F. Enhanced degradation of halogenated aliphatics by zero-valent iron. Ground Water 1994, 32, 958-967.
4. Gavaskar, A. R.; Gupta, N.; Sass, B. M.; Janosy, R. J.; O'Sullivan, D. Permeable Barriers for Groundwater Remediation Design, Construction, and Monitoring, Battelle Press: Columbus, OH, 1998.
5. Powell, R. M.; Blowes, D. W.; Gillham, R. W.; Schultz, D.; Sivavec, T.; Puls, R. W.; Vogan, J. L.; Powell, P. D.; Landis, R. Permeable Reactive Barrier Technologies for Contaminant Remediation; EPA/600/R-98/125; U.S. Printing Office: Washington, DC, September 1998.
6. Geiger, C. L.; Clausen, C. A.; Brooks, K.; Clausen, C.; Huntley, C.; Filipek, L.; Reinhart, D. R.; Quinn, J.; Krug, T.; O'Hara, S.; Major, D. Nanoscale and microscale iron emulsions for treating DNAPL. In Chlorinated Solvent and DNAPL Remediation Innovative Strategies for Subsurface Cleanup; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2003.
7. Brooks, K. In situ reductive dehalogentation of DNAPLS by the use of emulsified zero-valent nanoscale and microscale iron particles. Masters Thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 2000.
8. Arnold, W. A.; Roberts, A. L. Pathways and kinetics of chlorinated ethylene and chlorinated acetylene reaction with Fe(0) particles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 1794-1805.
9. Major, D.; McMaster, M.; Cox, E.; Edwards, E.; Dworatzek, S.; Hendrickson, E.; Starr, M.; Buonamici, L. Field demonstration of successful bioaugmentation to achieve dechlorination of tetrachloroethene to ethene. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36 (23), 5106-5116.
10. Eddy-Dilek, C.; Riha, B.; Jackson, D.; Consort, J. DNAPL Source Zone Characterization of Launch Complex 34, Cape Canaveral Air Station, Florida. Prepared for Interagency DNAPL Consortium by Westinghouse Savannah River Company and MSE Technology Applications, Inc.; 1998.
11. Battelle. Hydrogeologic and Chemical Data Compilation, Interagency DNAPL Consortium Remediation Demonstration Project, Launch Complex 34, Cape Canaveral Air Station, Florida. Prepared for Interagency DNAPL Consortium; 1999.
12. Feenstra, S.; Mackay, D. M.; Cherry, J. A method for assessing residual NAPL based on organic chemical concentrations in soil samples. Ground Water Monit. Rev. 1991, 11 (2), 128-136.
13. Pankow, J.; Cherry, J. Dense Chlorinated Solvents and Other DNAPLs in Groundwater; History, Behaviour, and Remediation; Waterloo Press: Portland, OR, 1996.
14. Battelle. Final Innovative Technology Evaluation Report: Demonstration of In Situ Dehalogenation of DNAPL through injection of Emulsified Zero-Valent Iron at Launch Complex 34 in Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. Prepared for US EPA SITE Program, September 10, 2004.
15. Bower, H. The Bower and Rice slug test - an update. Ground Water 1989, 27 (3), 304-309.
16. Bower, H.; Rice, R. C. A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells. Water Resour. Res. 1976, 12 (3), 423-428.
17. Davidson, B.; Spanos, T.; Zschuppe, R. Pressure Pulse Technology: An Enhanced Fluid Flow and Delivery Mechanism. Presented at the Fourth International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Monterey, CA, May 2004.
18. Deutsch, C.; Journel, A. GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide, 2nd ed.; Applied Geostatistics Series; Oxford University Press: New York, 1998; 369 pp.
19. Battelle. Final Report: Evaluating the Longevity and Hydraulic performance of Permeable Reactive Barriers at Department of Defense Sites. Prepared for NFESC, Port Hueneme, CA, under Contract N47408-95-D-0730; February 1, 2002.
20. Quinn, J.; O'Hara, S.; Krug, T.; Geiger, C.; Clausen, C. Evaluating the Distribution of Emulsified Zero-Valent Iron for Four Different Injection Techniques. Presented at the Fourth International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Monterey, CA, May 2004.