Classification of iowa wetlands using an airborne hyperspectral image: A comparison of the spectral angle mapper classifier and an object-oriented approach

Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 167-174

  Harken, James ^a   Sugumaran, Ramanathan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM; INFRARED IMAGING; MAPPING; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES; MAPPER CLASSIFIERS; SPATIAL RESOLUTIONS; SPECTRAL ANGLE MAPPER (SAM);

WETLANDS;

EID: 20044367501     PISSN: 07038992     EISSN: 17127971     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5589/m05-003     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alsdorf, D.E., Smith, L.C., and Melack, J.M. 2001. Amazon floodplain water level changes measured with interferometric SIR-C radar. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 423-431.
2. Anderson, B.D., Garono, R., and Robinson, R. 2003. CASI and Landsat: developing a spatially linked, hierarchical habitat cover dataset along the lower Columbia River, USA [online]. Available from http://www. waterobserver.org/event-2003-06/pdf/paper-04-June-05-BAnderson.pdf [accessed 9 December 2003].
3. Anderson, J.R., Hardy, E., Roach, J.T., and Witmer, R.E. 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
4. Antunes, A.Z.B., Lingnau, C., and Da Silva, J.C. 2003. Object-Oriented Analysis and Semantic Network for High Resolution Image Classification. In Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Remote Sensing, 510 April 2003, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. INPE. pp. 273-279.
5. Arbuckle, K., and Pease, J.L. 1999. Managing Iowa habitats: restoring Iowa wetlands. Iowa State University Extension, Pm-1351h.
6. Baatz, M., and Schape, A. 1999. Multi-resolution segmentation: an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. Angewandte Geographische Informationsverarbeitung XI: Beitrage zum AGIT Symposium, 7-9 July 1999, Salzburg, Germany.
7. Baatz, M., and Schape, A. 2001. eCognition user’s manual. Definiens Imaging GmbH, Munich, Germany.
8. Benz, U. 2001. Definiens Imaging GmbH: object oriented classification and feature detection. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society Newsletter Vol. 120, pp. 16-20.
9. Boardman J.W., and Kruse, F.A. 1994. Automated spectral analysis: a geological example using AVIRIS data, northern Grapevine Mountains, Nevada. In Proceedings ofthe 10th Thematic Conference, Geologic Remote Sensing, 9-12 May 1994, San Antonio, Tex. pp. I-407-I-418.
10. Bourgeau-Chavez, L.L., Kasischke, E.S., Brunzell, S.M., Mudd, J.P., Smith, K.B., and Frick, A.L. 2001. Analysis of space-borne SAR data for wetland mapping in Virginia riparian ecosystems. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 22, No. 18, pp. 3665-3687.
11. Chopra, R., Verma, V.K., and Sharma, P.K. 2001. Mapping, monitoring and conservation of Harike wetland ecosystem, Punjab, India, through remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 89-98.
12. Civco, D.L., Hurd, J.D., Wilson, E.H., Song, M., and Zhang, Z. 2002. A comparison of land use and land cover change detection methods. In Proceedings of the ASPRS-ACSM Annual Conference and FIG XXII Congress, 22-26 April 2002, Washington, D.C. ASPRS, Bethesda, Md. p. 12.
13. Clark, R.N., King, T., Klejwa, M., and Swayze, G.A. 1990. High spectral resolution reflectance spectroscopy of minerals. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 95, No. B8, pp. 653-680.
14. Dahl, T.E. 1990. Wetlands losses in the United States 1780’s to 1980’s. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. 21 p.
15. Darwish, A., Leukert, K., and Reinhardt, W. 2003. Image segmentation for the purpose of object-based classification. In Proceedings of IGARSS 2003, 21-25 July 2003, Toulouse, France. Vol. 3, pp. 2039-2041.
16. ENVI. 2002. 3.6 user’s manual Kodak Research Systems, Rochester, N.Y.
17. ERDAS. 2002. ERDAS Imagine v. 8.6 spectral analysis user’s guide. Leica Geosystems, Heerbrugg, Switzerland.
18. Garono, R., Schooler S., and Robinson, R. 2003. Using CASI imagery to map the extent of purple loosestrife /Lythrum salicaria/in tidally influenced wetlands of the Columbia River estuary [online]. Available from http://www.waterobserver.org/[accessed 9 December 2003].
19. Goldberg, J. 1998. Remote sensing of wetlands: procedures and considerations [online]. Available from http://www.vims.edu/rmap/cers/tutorial/rsecol.htm [accessed 5 January 2004].
20. Houhoulis, P.F., and Michener, W.K. 2000. Detecting wetland change: a rule-based approach using NWI and SPOT-XS data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 205-211.
21. IDALS. 1998. Iowa wetlands and riparian areas conservation plan [online]. Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship, Iowa Wetlands and Riparian Areas Conservation Plan, Division of Soil Conservation, Des Moines, Iowa. Available from http://www.ag.iastate.edu/centers/iawetlands/NWIhome.html [accessed 30 April 2003].
22. Kaya, S., Pultz, T.J., Mbogo, C.M., Beier, J.C., and Mushinzimana, E. 2002. The use of radar remote sensing for identifying environmental factors associated with malaria risk in coastal Kenya. In Proceedings of IGARSS 2002, 24-28 June 2002, Toronto, Ont. 3 p.
23. Kruse, F.A. 1988. Use of airborne imaging spectrometer data to map minerals associated with hydrothermally altered rocks in the northern Grapevine Mountains, Nevada and California. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 31-51.
24. Lunetta, R., and Balogh, M. 1999. Application of multi-temporal Landsat 5 TM imagery for wetland identification. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, Vol. 65, No. 11, pp. 1303-1310.
25. Lyon, J.G., and McCarthy, J. 1995. Wetland and environmental applications of GIS. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Fla. 373 p.
26. MacKinnon, F. 2001. Wetland application of LIDAR data: analysis of vegetation types and heights in wetlands. Applied Geomatics Research Group, Centre of Geographical Sciences, Lawrencetown, N.S. 44 p.
27. Marcus, W.A., Legleiter, C.J., Aspinall, R.J., Boardman J.W., and Crabtree, R.L. 2003. High spatial resolution, hyperspectral (HSRH) mapping of instream habitats, depths, and woody debris mountain streams. Geomorphology, Vol. 55, No. 1-4, pp. 363-380.
28. NCRST-E. 2001. NCRST-E remote sensing mission to Eddyville, Iowa in conjunction with the Iowa Department of Transportation [online]. Iowa Department of Transportation and National Consortium on Remote Sensing in Transportation-Environmental Group. Available from http://www.ncrste.msstate.edu/publications/posters/ncrste_eddyville_mission_2001.pdf [accessed 2 December 2003].
29. Ozemi, S.L. 2000. Satellite remote sensing of wetlands and a comparison of classification techniques. Master’s thesis, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minn. 220 p.
30. Pieters, C.M., and Mustard, J.M. 1988. Exploration of crustal/mantle material for the earth and moon using reflectance spectroscopy. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 24, pp. 151-178.
31. Rio, J.N.R., and Lozano-Garcia, D.F. 2000. Spatial filtering of radar data (RADARSAT) for wetlands (brackish marshes) classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 73, pp. 143-151.
32. Salem, F., and Kafatos, M. 2001. Hyperspectral image analysis for oil spill mitigation. In Proceedings of the 22nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, 5-9 November 2001, Singapore. Centre for Remote Imaging, Sensing and Processing, National University of Singapore; Singapore Institute of Surveyors and Valuers; Asian Association on Remote Sensing. Vol. 1, pp. 748-753.
33. Schmidt, K.S., and Skidmore, A.K. 2003. Spectral discrimination of vegetation types in a coastal wetland. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 85, pp. 92-108.
34. Shafri, H., and Mather, P.M. 1992. Assessment of wetland degradation in La Mancha, Spain using the synergy of airborne hyperspectral and satellite multispectral remote sensing data. In Proceedings of the 22nd EARSeL Symposium, 4-6 June 2002, Prague, Czech Republic [online]. Available from http://www.data fusion.org/pdf/wkshop/prague02/fusion_shafri.pdf.
35. Shaikh, M., Green, D., and Cross, H. 2001. A remote sensing approach to determine environmental flows for wetlands of the lower Darling River, New South Wales, Australia. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 22, No. 9, pp. 1737-1751.
36. Shepherd, I., Wilkinson, G., and Thompson, J. 1999. Monitoring surface water storage in the North Kent Marshes using Landsat TM images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 21, No. 9, pp. 1843-1865.
37. Story, M., and Congalton, R.G. 1986. Accuracy assessment: a user’s perspective. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 397-399.
38. Sugumaran, R., Pavuluri, M.K., and Zerr, D. 2003. The use of high-resolution imagery for identification of urban climax forest species using traditional and rule-based classification approach. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 41, No. 9, pp. 1933-1939.
39. Toyra, J., Pietroniro, A., and Martz, L.W. 2001. Multisensor hydrologic assessment of a freshwater wetland. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 75, pp. 162-173.
40. Underwood, E., Ustin, S., and DiPietro, D. 2003. Mapping nonnative plants using hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 86, pp. 150-161.
41. Whittecar, G.R., and Daniels, W.L. 1999. Use of hydrogeomorphic concepts to design created wetlands in southeastern Virginia. Geomorphology, Vol. 31, pp. 355-371.