Scientists and the marketplace of opinions. Scientific credibility takes on a different meaning when reaching out to the public

EMBO Reports

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 393-396

  Kreutzberg, Georg W ^a,b,c  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF NEUROBIOLOGY   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EXPERIMENTATION; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HUMAN; MASS MEDIUM; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PHYSICIAN; POLICY; POLITICAL SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; QUALITY CONTROL; SCIENCE;

PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC RELATIONS; PUBLISHING; SCIENCE;

EID: 20044366731     PISSN: 1469221X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400405     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Heisenberg W (1969) Der Teil und das Ganze. Munich, Germany: R. Piper
2. Kreutzberg GW (2004) The rules of good science. EMBO Rep 5: 330-332
3. Noelle-Neumann E (1999) Wissenschaft in der öeffentlichen Wahrnehmung. Forschung & Lehre 5: 228-232
4. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2001) Rethinking Science. Oxford, UK: Polity Press
5. Popper KR (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books
6. Weingart P (2001) Die Stunde der Wahrheit? Weilerswist, Germany: Velbrück Wissenschaft
7. Zimmerli WC, Sinn H (1990) Die Glaubwürdigkeit technisch-wissenschaftlicher Information. Düsseldorf, Germany: VDI