Ecological science and sustainability for the 21st century

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 3, Issue 1 SPEC. ISS., 2005, Pages 4-11

  Palmer, Margaret A ^a   Bernhardt, Emily S ^b   Chornesky, Elizabeth A ^c   Collins, Scott L ^d   Dobson, Andrew P ^e   Duke, Clifford S ^f   Gold, Barry D ^g   Jacobson, Robert B ^h   Kingsland, Sharon E ⁱ   Kranz, Rhonda H ^f   Mappin, Michael J ^j   Martinez, M Luisa ^k   Micheli, Fiorenza ^l   Morse, Jennifer L ^a   Pace, Michael L ^m   Pascual, Mercedes ⁿ   Palumbi, Stephen S ^l   Reichman, O J ^o   Townsend, Alan R ^p   Turner, Monica G ^q  

^a Bldg 142   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c University of New Mexico ^*  (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^e PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Ecological Society of America   (United States)

^g The David and Lucile Packard Foundation   (United States)

^h U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

ⁱ JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^k INSTITUTO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

^l STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^m CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM STUDIES   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^q UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 20044365591     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0004:esasft]2.0.co;2     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Atkins DE, Droege KK, Feldman SI, et al. 2003. Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure. Report of the National Science Foundation blue ribbon advisory panel on cyberinfrastructure. www.cise.nsf.gov/sci/reports/.
2. Bazzaz F, Ceballos G, Davis M, et al. 1998. Ecological science and the human predicament. Science 282: 879.
3. Berkowitz AR, Nilon CH, and Hollweg KS (Eds.) 2003. Understanding urban ecosystems: a new frontier for science and education. 8th Cary Conference (1999): Institute of Ecosystem Studies. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
4. Blondel J and Vigne JD. 1993. Space time and man as determinants of diversity of birds and mammals in the Mediterranean region. In: Ricklefs RE and Schulter D (Eds). Species diversity in ecological communities. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
5. Botkin DB. 1990. Discordant harmonies: a new ecology for the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, et al. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Science and Technology for Sustainable Development Special Feature. P Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 8086-91.
7. Clark WC and Dickson NM. 2003. Sustainability science: the emerging research program. P Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 8059-61.
8. Clark JS, Carpenter SR, Barber M, et al. 2001. Ecological forecasts: an emerging imperative. Science 293: 657-60.
9. Cogan DG. 2003. Corporate governance and climate change: making the connection. A CERES Sustainable Governance Project Report, prepared by the Investor Responsibility Research Center (IRRC). Washington, DC: IRRC, and Boston, MA: CERES.
10. Cohen J. 2003. Human population: the next half-century. Science 302: 1172-75.
11. Ecological Society of America. 2003. Annual Report. Ecological Society of America.
12. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, et al. 2001. Sustainability science. Science 292: 641-42.
13. Levin S. 1999. Fragile dominion: complexity and the commons. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.
14. Levy S. 2003. Turbulence in the Klamath River basin. Bioscience 53: 315-20.
15. Loucks OL and Gorman RF. 2004. Regional ecosystem services and the rating of investment opportunities. Front Ecol Environ 2: 207-16.
16. Loucks OL, Erekson OH, Bol JW, et al. 1999. Sustainability perspectives for resources and business. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
17. Lubchenco J. 1998. Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 279: 491-97.
18. Lubchenco J, Olson AM, Brubaker LB, et al. 1991. The Sustainable Biosphere Initiative: an ecological research agenda: a report from the Ecological Society of America. Ecology 72: 371-412.
19. Lutz W, Sanderson W, and Scherbov S. 2001. The end of population growth. Nature 412: 543-45.
20. McDonnell MA and Pickett STA (Eds.) 1993. Humans as components of ecosystems: the ecology of subtle human effects and populated areas. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
21. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2003. Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press. www.millennium assessment.org/en/index.aspx.
22. National Research Council Board on Sustainable Development. 1999. Our common journey, a transition toward sustainability. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23. National Research Council. 2001. Grand challenges in environmental sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
24. National Science Foundation. 2003. Complex environmental systems: synthesis for earth, life and society in the 21st century. National Science Foundation AC-ERE.
25. Olson GM and Olson JS. 2000. Distance matters. Special issue: new agendas for human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction 15: 139-78.
26. Palmer MA, Bernhardt E, Chornesky E, et al. 2004a. Ecology for a crowded planet. Science 304: 1251-52.
27. Palmer MA, Bernhardt E, Chornesky E, et al. 2004b. Ecological science and sustainability for a crowded planet: 21st century vision and action plan for the Ecological Society of America. www.esa.org/ecovisions.
28. Parson W. 2001. Practical perspective: scientists and politicians: the need to communicate. Public Underst Sci 10: 303-14.
29. Povilitis T. 2001. Toward a robust natural imperative for conservation. Conserv Biol 15: 533-35.
30. Redman CL. 1999. Human impact on ancient environments. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
31. Resilience Alliance. 2004. www.resalliance.org/ev_en.php.
32. Rhoten D. 2003. A multi-method analysis of the social and technical conditions for interdisciplinary collaboration. Final Report, National Science Foundation BCS-0129573.
33. Slingsby D and Barker S. 1998. From nature table to niche: curriculum progression in ecological concepts. Int Sci Educ 20: 479-86.
34. Smith HJ. 2003. The shape we're in. Science 302: 1681.
35. Thompson JN, Reichman OJ, Morin PJ, et al. 2001. Frontiers of ecology. BioScience 51: 15-24.
36. Turner BL II, Clark W, Kates R, et al. (Eds.) 1990. The Earth as transformed by human action: global and regional changes in the biosphere over the past 300 years. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Turner BL, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, et al. 2003. Illustrating the coupled human-environmental system for vulnerability analysis: three case studies. P Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 8080-85.
38. UNEP. 1999. United Nations Environmental Program Global Environmental Outlook. GEO-2000. www.unep.org/geo2000/.
39. Vitousek PM. 1994. Ecology and global change. Ecology 75: 1861-76.
40. Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, et al. 1997. Human domination of earth's ecosystems. Science 277: 494-99.
41. Worcester R. 2002. Public understanding of science. Biologist 49: 143.