Virtual outreach: A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of joint teleconferenced medical consultations

Health Technology Assessment

Volumn 8, Issue 50, 2004, Pages

  Wallace, P ^a   Barber, J ^a,b   Clayton, W ^a   Currell, R ^c   Fleming, K ^d   Garner, P ^e   Haines, A ^f   Harrison, R ^a   Jacklin, P ^f   Jarrett, C ^c   Jayasuriya, R ^a   Lewis, L ^c   Parker, S ^a   Roberts, J ^f   Thompson, S ^g   Wainwright, P ^c  

^a ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d ROYAL FREE LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^e BRITISH TELECOM   (United Kingdom)

^f LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^g MRC BIOSTATISTICS UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY SURGERY; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST CONTROL; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; FOLLOW UP; GASTROENTEROLOGY; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITAL CARE; HOSPITAL PERSONNEL; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NURSING; ORTHOPEDICS; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; OUTPATIENT CARE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRESCRIPTION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRODUCTIVITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TELECOMMUNICATION; TIME MANAGEMENT; UNITED KINGDOM; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 19944431728     PISSN: 13665278     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3310/hta8500     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. National Statistics. Key health statistics from general practice 1998. London: National Statistics; 2000.
2. Newton J, Hutchinson A, Hayes V, McColl E, Mackee I, Holland C. Do clinicians tell each other enough? An analysis of referral communications in two specialities. Fam Pract 1994; 11:15-20.
3. Preston C, Cheater F, Baker R, Hearnshaw H. Left in limbo: patient's views on care across the primary/secondary care interface. Quality in Health Care 1999;8:16-21.
4. Pencheon D. Matching demand and supply fairly and efficiently. BMJ 1998;316:1665-7.
5. Coulter A. Shifting the balance from secondary to primary care. BMJ 1995;311:1447-8.
6. Somerset M, Faulkner A, Shaw A, Dunn L, Sharp D. Obstacles on the path to a primary-care led National Health Service: complexities of outpatient care. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:213-25.
7. Wilkin D, Metcalfe D, Marinker M, The meaning of information on GP referral rates to hospitals. Community Medicine 1989; 11 65-70.
8. Roland M. Measuring appropriateness of hospital referrals. In Coulter A, Roland M, editors. Hospital referrals. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. pp. 137-49.
9. Jones Elwyn G, Stott N. Avoidable referrals? Analysis of 170 consecutive referrals to secondary care. BMJ 1994; 309:576-8.
10. O'Donnell C. Variation in GP referral rates: what can we learn from the literature? Fam Pract 2000; 17:462-71.
11. Coulter A, Noone A, Goldacre M. General practitioners' referrals to specialist outpatient clinics. 1. Why general practitioners refer patients to specialist outpatient clinics. II. Location of specialist outpatient clinics to which general practitioners refer patients. BMJ 1989;299:304-8.
12. Zwarenstein M, Bryant W. Interventions to promote collaboration between nurses and doctors (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library (Issue 2). Oxford: Update Software; 2001.
13. Westerman RF, Hull FM, Bezemer PD, Gort G. A study of communication between general practitioners and specialists. Br J Gen Pract 1990; 40:445-9.
14. Branger PJ, van der Wouden JC, Duisterhout JS, van der Lei J. Problems in communication between general practitioners and internal medicine consultants. Med Inform 1995;20:45-51.
15. Irazabal Olabarrieta L, Gutierrez Ruiz B. Does the communication between primary and secondary levels function? Aten Primaria 1996;17:376-81.
16. Jacobs LGH, Pringle MA. Referral letters and replies from orthopaedic departments: opportunities missed. BMJ 1990;301 470-3.
17. Jenkins RM. Quality of general practitioner referrals to outpatient departments: assessment by specialists and a general practitioner. Br J Gen Pract 1993;43:111-13.
18. Sips AJBI, Smeele I, van der Voort JPM. NHG-Standaard de verwijsbrief naar de tweede lijn. Huisarts Wet 1989; 32:102-5.
19. Stevens MM. 'Shuttle sheet': a patient-held medical record for paediatric oncology families. Med Paediatr Oncol 1992; 20 330-5.
20. Dickey LL. Promoting preventive care with patient-held minirecords: a review. Patient Educ Couns 1993;20:37-47.
21. Liaw ST, Radford AJ, Maddocks I. The impact of a computer generated patient held health record. Aust Fam Physician 1998; 27 (Suppl 1S):39-43.
22. Finlay IG, Wyatt P. Randomised cross-over study of patient-held records in oncology and palliative care. Lancet 1999;353:558-9.
23. Henderson C, Laugharne R. Patient held clinical information for people with psychotic illnesses (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library (Issue 2). Oxford: Update Software; 2002.
24. Thomson O'Brien M, Freemantle N, Oxman A, Wolf F, Davis D, Herrin J. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library (Issue 1). Oxford: Update Software; 2002.
25. Freemantle N, Harvey E, Wolf F, Grimshaw J, Grilli R, Bero L. Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library (Issue 1). Oxford: Update Software; 2002.
26. Thomson O'Brien M, Oxman A, Davis D, Haynes B, Freemantle N, Harvey E. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library (Issue 1 . Oxford: Update Software; 2002.
27. Thomson O'Brien M, Oxman A, Haynes B, Davis D, Freemantle N, Harvey E. Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library (Issue 1). Oxford: Update Software; 2002.
28. Davis D, Thomson M, Oxman A, Haynes B. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA 1995;274:700-5.
29. Woolf S, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Potential benefits, limitations and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 1999;318:527-30.
30. O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Bagley L, Lewis D, Read M, et al. The effect of orthodontic referral guidelines: a randomised controlled trial. Br Dent J 2000;188:392-7.
31. Morrison J, Carroll L, Twaddle S, Cameron I, Grimshaw J, Leyland A, et al. Pragmatic randomised controlled trial to evaluate guidelines for the management of infertility across the primary care-secondary care interface. BMJ 2001; 322:1282-4.
32. Enderby P. A study of hospital outpatient services. London: Audit Commission, HMSO; 1999.
33. Bowling A, Bond M. A national evaluation of specialists' clinics in primary care settings. Br J Gen Pract 2001;51 264-9.
34. Powell J. Systematic review of outreach clinics in primary care in the UK. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7(3):177-83.
35. Vierhout WPM, Knottnerus JA, van Ooij A, Crebolder HFJM, Pop P, Wesselingh AMK, Beusmans GHMI. Effectiveness of joint consultation sessions of general practitioners and orthopaedic surgeons for locomotor-system disorders. Lancet 1995;346:990-4.
36. Vlek JFM. Cardialogue; joint consultations of general practitioners and cardiologists in a primary care setting. Thesis. Maastricht; 2000.
37. Taylor P. Survey of research in telemedicine. 2: Telemedicine services. J Telemed Telecare 1998; 4:63-71.
38. Dwyer T. Telepsychiatry: psychiatric consultation by interactive television. Am J Psychiatry 1973; 130:865-9.
39. Hubble J, Pahwa R, Michalek D, Thomas C, Koller W. Interactive video conferencing: a means of providing interim care to Parkinson's disease patients. Mov Disord 1993;8:380-2.
40. Ball C, McLaren P, Summerfield A, Lipsedge M, Watson J. A comparison of communication modes in adult psychiatry. J Telemed Telecare 1995;1:22-6.
41. Sclafani A, Heneghan C, Ginsburg J, Sabini P, Stern J, Dolitsky J. Teleconsultation in otolaryngology: live versus store and forward consultations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 120 62-72.
42. Harno K, Telemedicine in managing demand for secondary-care services. J Telemed Telecare 1999; 5:189-92.
43. Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ 2000; 320:1517-20.
44. Taylor P. A survey of research in telemedicine. 1: Telemedicine systems. J Telemed Telecare 1998;4:1-17.
45. Currell R, Urquhart C, Wainwright P, Lewis R. Telemedicine versus face to face care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library (Issue 1 . Oxford: Update Software; 2002.
46. Hersh WR, Helfand M, Wallace J, Kraemer D, Patterson P, Shapiro S, Greenlick M, et al. Telemedicine for the Medicare population. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 24 (Prepared by Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR under contract no. 290-97-0018). AHRQ Publication No. 01-E060. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2001.
47. Whitten P, Allen A. Analysis of telemedicine from an organizational perspective. Telemed J 1995; 1(3):203-10.
48. Harrison R, Clayton W, Wallace P. Cluster randomised controlled trial of virtual outreach - a pilot study. J Telemed Telecare 1999;5:126-30.
49. Zelen M. Randomized consent designs for clinical trials: an update. Stat Med 1990;9:645-56.
50. Donner A. A regression approach to the analysis of data arising from cluster randomization. J Epidemiol 1985;14 322-6.
51. Roland M. Measuring referral rates. In Roland M, Coulter A, editors. Hospital referrals. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. pp. 62-5.
52. Doolittle GC, Williams A, Harmon A, Allen A, Boysen CD, Wittman C, et al. A cost measurement study for a tele-oncology practice. J Telemed Telecare 1998;4:84-8.
53. Wootton R, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, Eedy DJ, Hicks N, Lotery HE, et al. Multicentre randomised control trial comparing real time teledermatology with conventional outpatient dermatological care: societal cost-benefit analysis. BMJ 2000;320:1252-6.
54. Whitten PS, Mair FS, Haycox A, May CR, Williams TL, Hellmich S. Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine. BMJ 2002;324:1434-7.
55. Wallace P, Haines A, Harrison R, Barber J, Thompson S, Jacklin P, et al. Joint teleconsultations (virtual outreach) versus standard outpatient appointments for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:1961-8.
56. Netten A, Curtis L. Unit costs of health and social care University of Kent at Canterbury; 2000.
57. Snowden S, Harrison R, Wallace P. Practitioner participants in a telemedicine trial: comparisons with their peers. J Telemed Telecare 2001;7:32-7.
58. Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D, Lawrence K, Petersen S, Paice C, et al. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? J Public Health Med 1997;19:179-86.
59. Landgraf M L, Abetz L, Ware JE. Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ): A user's manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1996.
60. Parkerson GJ. Classification of severity of health problems in family/general practice: an international field trial. Fam Pract 1996;13:303-9.
61. Ware JE, Snyder MK, Wright WR, Davies AR. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Evaluation and Program, Planning 1983;6:247-63.
62. Howie JGR, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ. A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as outcome measure of primary care consultations. Fam Pract 1998;15:165-71.
63. Wallace P, Haines A, Harrison R, Barber J, Thompson S, Roberts J. Putting telemedicine to the test; design and performance of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of joint teleconsultations. BMC Family Practice 2002;3:1. URL: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/3/1
64. Barber JA, Thompson SG. Analysis and interpretation of cost data in randomised controlled trials: review of published studies. BMJ 1998; 317:1195-200.
65. Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining studies from several studies in meta-analysis. In Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG, editors. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books; 2001. pp. 285-312.
66. Bromwich M. The economics of capital budgeting. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1976.
67. Department of Health. NHS reference costs 2000. London: Department of Health; 2000.
68. Office of National Statistics. The new earnings survey. London: Stationery Office; 2001.
69. AA website. URL: http://www.theaa.com/allaboutcars/advice/advice_rcosts_petrol_table.jsp (accessed May 2002).
70. Barber JA, Thompson SG. Analysis of cost data in randomised trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrap. Stat Med 2000;19:3219-36.
71. Burns T, Creed F, Fahy T, Thompson S, Tyrer P, White I. Intensive versus standard case management for severe psychotic illness trials. UK 700 Group. Lancet 1999;353:2185-9.
72. Fisher LD, van Belle G. Biostatistics. New York: John Wiley; 1993.
73. MacFarlane A, Harrison R, Wallace P. Triadic medical consultations a sociological analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2002; 8 S2):56-7.
74. Wootton R. Telemedicine and isolated communities: a UK perspective. J Telemed Telecare 1999;5: 27-34.
75. Grol R, Whitfield M, De Maeseneer J, Mokkink H. Attitudes to risk taking in medical decision making in British, Dutch and Belgian practitioners. Br J Gen Pract 1990;40:134-6.
76. Winkens R, Dinant JG. Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: rational, cost effective use of investigations in clinical practice. BMJ 2002; 324:783.
77. Williams TL, May C, Esmail A. Limitations of patient satisfaction studies in telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. Telemed J E Health 2001;7:293-316.
78. Mercer S, Reilly D, Watt G. Enablement and the therapeutic alliance: an evaluation of the consultation at the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital. Glasgow: AdHom; 2001. URL: http://www.adhom.com/download/enablement.pdf (accessed February 2002).
79. Freeman GK, Horder JP, Howie JGR, Hungin AP, Hill AP, Shah NC, Wilson A. Evolving general practice consultation in Britain: issues of length and context. BMJ 2002;324:880-3.
80. Drummond MF, O'Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997.
81. Bergmo TS. An economic analysis of teleradiology versus a visitina radiologist service. J Telemed Telecare 1996;2 136-42.
82. Sonnenberg FA, Roberts MS, Tsevat J, Wong JB, Barry M, Kent DL. Toward a peer review process for medical decision analysis models. Med Care 1994; 32:JS52-64.
83. Elford DR. Telemedicine in northern Norway. J Telemed Telecare 1997;3:1-22.
84. Whitten P, Collins B, Mair F. Nurse and patient reactions to a developmental home telecare system. J Telemed Telecare 1998; 4 152-60.
85. May C, Harrison R, MacFarlane A, Williams T, Mair F, Wallace P. Why do telemedicine systems fail to normalize as stable models of service delivery? J Telemed Telecare 2003;9 Suppl 1: S25-6.