Identification of matrices in science and engineering

Journal for General Philosophy of Science

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 277-305

  Hendricks, V F ^a   Jakobsen, A ^b   Pedersen, S A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Engineering vs. basic sciences; Epistemology of engineering; Technical matrices in science and engineering; The methodology of engineering; The ontological methodological epistemological differences between engineering and basic sciences

Indexed keywords

EID: 19944419421     PISSN: 09254560     EISSN: 15728587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1026512011115     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Anderson, B. G. (1957), 'Rigid Frame Failures', Journal of American Concrete Institute 23, 625-636.
2. Andreasen, B. S. (1989), Anchorage of Robbed Reinforcing Bars, Doctoral Thesis, The Technical University of Denmark.
3. Bunge, M. (1966), 'Technology and Applied Science', Technology and Culture 6, 329-347.
4. Bucciarelli, L. (1994), Designing Engineers, Cambridge, The MIT Press.
5. Compton, A. H. (1921), 'Possible Magnetic Polarity of Free Electrons', Philosophical Magazine 41, 279-281.
6. DHI, Danish Hydraulic Institute (1996), MOUSE (Computer Application), ed. 3.3. Hørsholm, Denmark.
7. Elstner, R. C. and Hognestad, E. (1957), 'Laboratory Investigation of Rigid Frame Failures, Journal of American Concrete Institute 23, 637-668.
8. Gutting, G. (1984), 'Paradigms, Revolutions and Technology', in The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant? Laudan, R. (ed.), D. Reidel Publishing Company: 47-65.
9. Horwich, P. (1990), Truth, Cambridge: Blackwell.
10. Kuhn, T. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Kuhn, T. (1973), Objectivity, Value Judgment and Theory Choice', Machette Lecture, Furman University.
12. Kelly, K. T. (1996) The Logic of Reliable Inquiry, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Jakobsen, A. and Pedersen, S. A. (1996), 'Engineering Science and the Reality', forthcoming.
14. Layton, E. T. (1988), 'The Role of the Engineering Sciences', History and Technology 29, 82-97.
15. Levi, I. (1991), The Fixation of Belief and its Undoing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Hendricks, E., Versterholm, T. and Sorenson, S. (1992), 'Non-linear, Closed Loop, SI Engine Control Observers', SAE Technical Paper, SAE Annual Meeting, Detroit, MI, U.S.A., February.
17. Van Fraassen, B. (1980), The Scientific Image, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
18. Hendricks, V. F. (1996), Epistemology, Methodology and Reliability, Doctoral Thesis, University of Copenhagen.
19. Peirce, C. S. (1958), Charles S. Peirce: Selected Writings, Ed. Weiner, P. New York: Dover Publications.
20. Price, D. de Solla, (1962), 'Is Technology Historically Independent of Science? A Study of Statistical Historiography', Technology and Culture 4, 553-568.
21. Rasmussen, K. (1980), Analogier mellem Mekaniske, Akustiske og Elektriske Systemer, Polyteknisk forlag.
22. Simon, H. A. (1969), The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambrige: Mass.
23. Skolimowski, H. (1966), 'The Structure of Thinking in Technology', Technology and Culture 6, 371-383.
24. Thomsen, J. J. (1990), 'Modelling Human Tibia Structural Vibrations', Journal of Biomechanics 23, 3: 215-228.
25. Vincenti, W. G. (982), 'Control-Volume Analysis: A Difference in Thinking between Engineering and Physics', Technology and Culture 23, 145-174.
26. Vincenti, W. G. (1990), What Engineers Know and How They Know It. Johns Hopkins University Press.