Model based engineering of learning situations for adaptive web based educational systems

Thirteenth International World Wide Web Conference Proceedings, WWW2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 826-835

  Nodenot, Thierry ^a   Marquesuzaa, Christophe ^b   Laforcade, Pierre ^c   Sallaberry, Christian ^c  

^a LIUPPA   (France)

^b IUT de Bayonne   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE PAU ET DES PAYS DE L'ADOUR   (France)

Author keywords

Architectures and designs for web based learning delivery environments; Models and Metamodels; Specification of educational applications; UML Language

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; EDUCATION; INFORMATION SERVICES; LEARNING SYSTEMS; METADATA; SPECIFICATIONS;

ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN FOR WEB-BASED LEARNING DELIVERY ENVIRONMENTS; MODELS AND METAMODELS; SPECIFICATION OF EDUCATIONAL APPLICATIONS; UML LANGUAGE;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 19944418840     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. BlackBoard, Blackboard Course Management System. http://www.blackboard. com
2. WebCT, WebCT Course Management System. http://www.webct.com
3. IMS, IMS Learning Design Information Model. 2003, IMS Global Learning Consortium. http://imsglobal.org/learningdesign/.
4. Nodenot, T., et al. Knowledge Modelling of Co-operative Learning Situations: Towards a UML profile. in 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, International AI-ED Society. 2003. Sydney (Australia).
5. Brusilovsky, P. A Distributed Architecture for Adaptive and Intelligent Learning Management Systems. in Workshop "Towards Intelligent Learning Management Systems", 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2003. Sydney (Australia).
6. Peter, Y. and T. Vantroys. A Flexible Workfow System for the Enactment of Pedagogical Scenarii. in 4th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training. 2003. Marrakech (Morocco).
7. Schneemayer, G., Contextual Web Services for Teaching, in Institut für Informatik. 2002, Ludwig Maximilians Universität: München (Allemagne).
8. Brusilovsky, P. and H. Nijhawan. A framework for Adaptive E-Learning Based on Distributed Re-usable Learning Activities. in AACE World Conference on E-Learning, Elearn 2002. 2002. Montreal (Canada).
9. Sallaberry, C., et al. Information modelling within a Net-Learning Environment. in 12th Conference on Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases. 2002. Krippen, Swiss Saxony (Deutschland): IOS Press.
10. Oudot, C., Modélisation UML d'une situation d'apprentissage coopérative. 2003, Rapport de stage du DESS "Sciences Cognitives Appliquées", Université de Bordeaux 2.
11. Laforcade, P., et al. Profiling Co-operative Problem-Based Learning Situations. in IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI 2003). 2003. London (UK): IEEE.
12. Nodenot, T., et al. A UML Profile incorporating separate viewpoints when modeling Co-operative Learning Situations. in IEEE International Conference on Information Technology: Research and Education. 2003. Newark (USA).
13. OMG, Model Driven Architecture (MDA). 2001. http://www.omg.org/docs/ ormsc/01-07-01.pdf.
14. OMG, UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification. 2002. http://www.omg.org/docs/ ptc/03-08-02.pdf.
15. OMG, UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance, and Time Specification. 2002. www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/schedulability.htm.
16. OMG, Workflow Management Facility Specification vl.2. 2002. http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/00-05-02.pdf.
17. Laforcade, P. and F. Barbier. UML Modeling for Cooperative Problem-Based Learning Situations: Towards Educational Components, in 2003 IRMA International Conference. 2003. Radisson Warwick Hotel, Philadelphia Pennsylvania, USA.
18. Fridmann Noy, N., R.W. Fergerson, and M. Musen. The knowledge model of Protégé-2000: combining interoperability and flexibility, in Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW 2000). 2000. Juan-Les-Pins.
19. Mizogushi, R. and J. Bourdeau, Using Ontological Engineering to Overcome Common AI-ED Problems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2000. volume 11, no 2.
20. Barros, B., et al. Applications of a Collaborative Learning Ontology. in MICAI'2002 Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2002: Springer-Verlag.
21. Mizogushi, R. Ontology-based systematization of functional knowledge, in TMCE2002:Tools and methods of competitive engineering. 2002. Wuhan (China).
22. OMG, White Paper on the Profile Mechanism. 1999, Object Management Group Analysis and Design Task Force(Contact P. Desfray).
23. OMG, Meta-Object Facility (MOF) Specification. 2000. http://www.omg.org/ technology/documents/formal/mof.htm
24. Breton, E., Contribution à la représentation de processus par des techniques de méta-modélisation. 2002, Thèse de doctorat de l'Université de Nantes.
25. OMG, The Software Process Engineering Management Metamodel (SPEM). 2001. http://cs.ua.edu/630/Notes,%20etc/OMG%20SPEM/submission% 202%20-%20ad-2001-02- 08.pdf.
26. Engeström, Y., R. Miettinen, and R.L. Punamaki, Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
27. Ellis, C. and J. Wainer. A conceptual model of Groupware. in ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW94). 1994. Chapel Hill, North Carolina (USA).
28. Rubart, J. and P. Dawabi. A UML Profile for Modeling Groupware. in 8th International Workshop, CRIWG'2002. 2002. La Serena (Chile): Published in J. M. Haake & J. A. Pino (Ed.): Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use.
29. Bruel, J.-M. and I. Ober. The new UML 2.0 Component Model : Critical View, in Proceedings of Euromicro Conference. 2003. Belek (Turquie).
30. Meirieu, P. Apprendre... Oui mais comment? Collection Pédagogies. 1994, ESF Edition.