The meaning of workplace discrimination for women with disabilities

Work

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 369-380

  Randolph, Diane Smith ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; DISABLED PERSON; DISEASE SEVERITY; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERVIEW; JOB FINDING; MINORITY GROUP; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; POLITICS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SELF EVALUATION; SOCIAL ASPECT; WORKING TIME; WORKPLACE;

DISABLED PERSONS; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; PREJUDICE;

EID: 19944417318     PISSN: 10519815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. M. Baldwin, W.G. Johnson and S. Watson, A double burden of discrimination: Women with disabilities, Center for the Study of Social Policy: Washington, D.C., 1993.
2. C. Bolick and S. Nestleworth, Opportunity 2000: Creative affirmative action strategies for a changing workforce, Hudson Institute, Inc.: Indianapolis, IN, 1988.
3. F. Bowe, Adults with disabilities: A portrait, President's Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities: Washington, D.C., 1992.
4. D. Braddock and L. Bachelder, The glass ceiling and persons with disabilities. Public Policy Monograph Series, The University of Illinois at Chicago: Institute on Disability and Human Development, College of Associated Health Professions, 1994.
5. R.V. Burkhauser, R.H. Havemen and B.L. Wolfe, The changing economic condition of the disabled: A two decade review of economic well-being, National Council on Disability: Washington, D.C., 1990.
6. F.A. Clark, D. Parham, M.E. Carlson, G. Frank, J. Jackson, D. Pierce, R. Wolfe and R. Zemke, Occupational science: Academic innovation in the service of occupational therapy, American Journal of Occupational Therapy 45 (1991), 300-305.
7. A. Colella, A. DeNisi and M. Lund, The role of expectations in early socialization of employees with disabilities, Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA: August, 1993.
8. J.W. Creswell, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, 1997.
9. M. Csikszentmihalyi, Paper presented at Occupational Science Symposium V, Loyola University, Chicago, IL: September, 1992.
10. A. Farrokh, Explain your reasons: Attribution theory, [On-line], Available: www.csuohio.edu/hca/hca615/attrib.htm, 1996.
11. R. Greenwood, V.A. Johnson and K.F. Schriner, Employer concerns regarding workers with disabilities and the business-rehabilitation partnership: The PWI practitioner's perspective, Journal of Rehabilitation 6 (1991), 14-19.
12. W.G. Johnson and J. Lambrinos, Wage discrimination against handicapped men and women, Journal of Human Resources 20 (1985), 264-277.
13. W.B. Johnston and A.E. Packer, Workforce 2000, Hudson Institute, Inc.: Indianapolis, IN, 1987.
14. Lou Harris and Associates, NOD/Harris survey of Americans with disabilities, National Organization on Disability: New York, NY, 1998.
15. P. Lather, Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern, Routledge: New York, NY, 1991.
16. C. Moustakas, Phenomenological research methods, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994.
17. V. Olesen, Feminisms and models of qualitative research, in: Handbook of qualitative research, N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, eds, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994, pp. 158-174.
18. D. Pfeiffer, The influence of socio-economic characteristics of disabled people on their employment status and income level, Disability, Handicap and Society 6 (1991), 103-114.
19. U.S. Bureau of Census, Survey of income and program participation, U.S. Bureau of Census: Washington, D.C., 1994.
20. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, The performance of physically impaired workers in manufacturing industries: A report prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Veterans Administration, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, D.C., 1948.
21. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Working group on career mobility: Final report on employees with disabilities in the Department of Health and Human Services, US Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, D.C., 1993.
22. U.S. Department of Labor, A report on the glass ceiling initiative, US Department of Labor: Washington, D.C., 1991.
23. S. Wendell, The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability, Routledge: New York, NY, 1996.
24. T.J. Wright and P. Leung, Meeting the unique needs of minorities with disabilities: A report to the President and Congress, National Council on Disability: Washington, D.C., 1993.
25. R. Zemke and F.A. Clark, eds, Occupational science: The evolving discipline, F.A. Davis: Philadelphia, PA, 1996.