A comparison of implementation strategies for MPC

Modeling, Identification and Control

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 39-50

  Lie, Bernt ^a   Díez, Marta Dueñas ^a   Hauge, Tor Anders ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Comparison of QP solvers; Model predictive control; Quadratic programming

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ACTUATORS; ALGORITHMS; LYAPUNOV METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING;

INPUT-OUTPUT EQUIVALENT; LINEAR EQUALITY; MODEL BASED PREDICTIVE CONTROL (MPC); STATE SPACE MODELS;

PREDICTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 19944415349     PISSN: 03327353     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4173/mic.2005.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. BARTLETT, R. A., BIEGLER, L. T., BACKSTROM, J. & GOPAL, V. (2002). 'Quadratic Programming Algorithms for Large-Scale Model Predictive Control', Journal of Process Control, 12, p. 775.
2. CAMACHO, E. F. & BORDONS, C. (1999). Model Predictive Control, Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing, Springer, London.
3. COLEMAN, T., BRANCH, M. A. & GRACE, A. (1999). Optimization Toolbox for Use with MATLAB. User's Guide, Version 2, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts.
4. DOWNS, J. & VOGEL, E. (1993). 'A Plant-Wide Industrial Process Control Problem', Computers chem. Engng., 17(3), pp. 245-255.
5. GILL, P. E., HAMMARLING, S. J., MURRAY, W., SAUNDERS, M. A. & WRIGHT, M. H. (1986). User's Guide for Lssol (Version 1.0): A Fortran Package for Constrained Linear Least-Squares and Convex Quadratic Programming., Technical Report SOL 86-1, Systems Optimization Laboratory, Dept. Operations Research, Stanford University.
6. GILL, P. E., MURRAY, W. & SAUNDERS, M. A. (1995). User's Guide for Qpopt 1.0: A Fortran Package for Quadratic Programming., Technical Report SOL 95-4, Systems Optimization Laboratory, Dept. Operations Research, Stanford University.
7. GILL, P. E., MURRAY, W. & SAUNDERS, M. A. (1997). User's Guide for Sqopt 5.3: A Fortran Package for Large-Scale Linear and Quadratic Programming., Technical Report Draft, Systems Optimization Laboratory, Dept. Operations Research, Stanford University.
8. GOLUB, G. H. & VAN LOAN, C. F. (1996). Matrix Computations, third edn, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
9. HAUGE, T. A. & LIE, B. (2002), 'Paper Machine Modeling at Norske Skog Saugbrugs: A Mechanistic Approach', Modeling, Identification and Control, 23(1).
10. HOLMSTRÖM, K. (2001). The Tomlab Optimization Environment V3.0 User's Guide., Technical report, HKH MatrixAnalys AB.
11. JURICEK, B. C., SEBORG, D. E. & LARIMORE, W. E. (2001). 'Identification of the Tennessee Eastman Challenge Process with Subspace Methods', Cont. Engng. Practice, 9, pp. 1337-1351.
12. MACIEJOWSKI, J. (2002). Predictive Control with Constraints, Prentice Hall, Harlow, England.
13. MCAVOY, T. & YE, N. (1994). 'Base Control for the Tennessee Eastman Problem', Computers chem. Engng., 18(5), pp. 383-413.
14. MUSKE, K. R. & RAWLINGS, J. B. (1993). 'Model Predictive Control with Linear Models', AIChE Journal, 39(2), pp. 262-287.
15. RAWLINGS, J. B. & MUSKE, K. R. (1993). 'Stability of Constrained Receding Horizon Control.', IEEE Trans. Auto. Cont., 38(10), pp. 1512-1516.
16. SEBORG, D. E., EDGAR, T. F. & MELLICHAMP, D. A. (1989). Process Dynamics and Control, John Wiley & Sons, New York.