A hybrid approach for searching in the semantic web

Thirteenth International World Wide Web Conference Proceedings, WWW2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 374-383

  Rocha, Cristiano ^a   Schwabe, Daniel ^a   De Aragão, Marcus Poggi ^a  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Network Analysis; Ontologies; Semantic Associations; Semantic Search; Semantic Web; Spread Activation Algorithms

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; QUERY LANGUAGES; SEARCH ENGINES; SEMANTICS;

ONTOLOGIES; SEMANTIC ASSOCIATIONS; SEMANTIC SEARCH; SEMANTIC WEB; SPREAD ACTIVATION ALGORITHMS;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 19944411181     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/988672.988723     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Aleman-Meza, B., Halaschek, C., Arpinar, I., and Sheth, A. Context-Aware Semantic Association Ranking. Proceedings of SWDB'03: 33-50, Berlin, Germany, 2003.
2. Chen, H., and Ng, T. An Algorithmic Approach to Concept Exploration in a Large Knowledge Network (Automatic Thesaurus Consultation); Symbolic Branch-and-Bound vs. Connectionist Hopfield Net Activation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 46(5):348-369, 1995.
3. Cohen, P., and Kjeldsen, R. Information Retrieval by Constrained Spreading Activation on Semantic Networks. Information Processing and Management, 23(4):255-268, 1987.
4. Crestani, F. Application of Spreading Activation Techniques in Information Retrieval. Artificial Intelligence Review, 11(6): 453-482, 1997.
5. Davies, J., Weeks, R., and Krohn, U. QuizRDF: Search Technology for the Semantic Web. WWW2002 workshop on RDF & Semantic Web Applications, Proc. WWW2002, Hawaii, USA, 2002.
6. Fayad, M., Schmidt, D., and Johnson, R. Building Application Frameworks. Wiley Computer Publishing, 1999.
7. Froogle. http://froogle.google.com
8. Guha, R., and McCool, R. Tap: Towards a web of data. http://tap.stanford. edu/.
9. Guha, R., McCool, R., and Miller, E. Semantic Search. Proceedings of the WWW2003, Budapest, 2003.
10. Lucene Search Engine. http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene
11. O'Hara, K., Alani, H., and Shadbolt, N. Identifying Communities of Practices: Analyzing Ontologies as Networks to Support Community Recognition, IFIP-WCC 2002, Montreal, 2002, Kluwer.
12. Peat, H., and Willet, P. The limitations of term co-occurrence data from query expansion in document retrieval systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 378-383, 1991.
13. Portinari Project Website. http://www.portinari.org.br
14. PUC-Rio Informatics Dept. http://www.inf.puc-rio.br.
15. Sheth, A., Bertram, C., Avant, D., Hammond, B., Kochut, K., and Warke, Y. Managing Semantic Content for the Web. IEEE Internet Computing 6(4): 80-87, 2002.
16. Srikant, R., and Agrawal, R. Mining generalized association rules. Proceedings of VLDB '95, pp. 407-419, 1995.
17. Stojanovic, N., Struder R., and Stojanovic, L. An Approach for the Ranking of Query Results in the Semantic Web. Proc. of ISWC '03 (Sanibel Island, FL, October 2003), Springer-Verlag, 500-516, 2003.
18. Yates, B., and Neto, B. Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press, New York, USA, 1999.
19. Zobel, J., and Moffat, A. Exploring the similarity space. ACM SIGIR Forum 32(1): 18-34, Spring, 1998.