The academic library as congenial space: More on the Saint Mary's experience

New Library World

Volumn 106, Issue , 2005, Pages 7-15

  Houlihan, Ron ^a  

^a SAINT MARY S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Academic libraries; Canada; Physical planning; Redesign; Space utilization; Students

Indexed keywords

EID: 19944406442     PISSN: 03074803     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/03074800510575311     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abram, S. and Luther, J. (2004), “Born with the chip”, Library Journal, Vol. 129 No. 8, pp. 34-39.
2. Albanese, A. (2003), “Deserted no more”, Library Journal, Vol. 128 No. 7, pp. 34-36.
3. Albanese, A. (2004), “Campus library 2.0”, Library Journal, Vol. 129 No. 7, pp. 30-33.
4. Alexander, C. (1977), A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
5. Block, M. (2003), “How to become a great public space”, American Libraries, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 72-77.
6. Burke, L. (2004), “The saving grace of library space”, American Libraries, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 74-76.
7. Carlson, S. (2001), “The deserted library”, Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 48 No. 12, pp. A35-38.
8. Engel, D. and Antell, K. (2004), “The life of the mind: a study of faculty spaces in academic libraries”, College & Research Libraries, Vol. 65 No. 1, pp. 8-19.
9. Gosling, W. (2000), “To go or not to go? Library as place”, American Libraries, Vol. 31 No. 11, pp. 44-45.
10. Hisle, W. (2002), “Top issues facing academic libraries”, College and Research Libraries News, Vol. 63 No. 10, pp. 714-715.
11. Huang, J. (2001), “Future space: a new blueprint for business architecture”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 149-158.
12. Kapitzke, C. (2001), “Ceremony and cybrary: digital libraries and the dialectic of place and space”, Social Alternatives, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 33-42.
13. Lefebvre, M. (2002), “The library as congenial space: the Saint Mary's experience”, New Library World, Vol. 103 No. 1172/1173, pp. 21-29.
14. Lewis, D. (2004), “The innovator's dilemma: disruptive change and academic libraries”, Library Administration and Management, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 68-74.
15. Lippincott, J. (2002), “Developing collaborative relationships: librarians, students and faculty creating learning communities”, College and Research Libraries News, Vol. 63 No. 3, pp. 190-192.
16. Lougheed, T. (2001), “Libraries maintain clout and cachet in the information age”, University Affairs, Vol. 48 No. 8, pp. 9-11.
17. Michaels, A. (2003), “Forum III: physical spaces for the e-ssential library”, Library Administration and Management, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 78-83.
18. Mitchell, A. (2004), “Shussh … and please enjoy yourself”, The University Report Card, The Globe and Mail, Toronto, pp. 22-3, available at: www.globeandmail.com/series/reportcard/news/twelve.html.
19. Shill, H. (2004), “Does the building still matter? usage patterns in new, expanded and renovated libraries, 1995-2002”, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 123-150.
20. Weise, F. (2004), “Being there: the library as place”, Journal of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 92 No. 1, pp. 6-13.
21. Wilson, A. (Ed.) (2004), The 2003 OCLC Environmental Scan: Pattern Recognition: A Report to the OCLC Membership, Online Computer Library Center, Dublin, OH, available at: www.oclc.org/membership/escan/.
22. Atkinson, R. (2001), “Contingency and contradiction: the place(s) of the library at the dawn of the new millennium”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 3-11.