Air quality modeling in a highly industrialized valley regime: A comparison of AERMOD-PRIME to ISCST-PRIME and ISCST3 results for PM10 emissions

Guideline on Air Quality Models: The Path Forward

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 109-119

  Tarde, Jeffrey A ^a   Westbrook, James A ^b  

^a Johns Manville   (United States)

^b BlueScape Environmental   (United States)

Author keywords

AERMOD; AERMOD PRIME; Air dispersion modeling; Building downwash; Cavity; CCM; ISCST3; ISCST3 PRIME; Meteorological Data; Valley

Indexed keywords

AIR DISPERSION; COMPLEX TERRAINS; OHIO RIVER VALLEY, WEST VIRGINIA; RECEPTORS;

ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE; CAVITATION; DATA REDUCTION; DISPERSIONS; GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS; INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METEOROLOGICAL PROBLEMS; WAKES; WIND EFFECTS;

AIR QUALITY;

EID: 19944396799     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (3)

1. Panek, JA; Graw, RL; Evaluation of AERMOD at a Rural Petroleum Refinery in Simple and Complex Terrain; 11th Joint Conference on the Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology with the Air and Waste Management Association; Jan, 2000.
2. USEPA; Comparison of Regulatory Design Concentrations; Staff Report, USEPA, OAQPS, Research Triangle Park, NC, EPA-454/R-03-002, June 2003.
3. USEPA; Consequences Analysis of Using ISC-PRIME Over the Industrial Source Complex Short Term Model; Staff Report, USEPA, OAQPS, Research Triangle Park, NC, April 1998.