The impact of impermanent Web-located citations: A study of 123 scholarly conference publications

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 56, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 695-703

  Sellitto, Carmine ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIES; HTTP; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; INTERNET; SEARCH ENGINES; WEBSITES;

INFORMATION ACCESS; PUBLICATIONS; SCHOLARY ARTICLES; WEB-LOCATED CITATIONS;

ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING;

EID: 19944393273     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20159     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baker, M.J. (2000). Writing a literature review. The Marketing Review, 1(2), 219-247.
2. Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1998). A narrative approach to organizational studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Davenport, T.H. (1997). Information ecology: Mastering the information and knowledge environment. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Davis, P.M., & Cohen, S.A. (2001). The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(4), 309-314.
5. Dellavalle, R.P., Hester, E.J., Heilig, L.F., Drake, A.L., Kuntzman, J.W., Graber, M., et al. (2003). Going, going, gone: Lost Internet references. Science, 302(11), 787-788.
6. Germaine, C.A. (2000). URLs: Uniform resource locators or unreliable resource locators? College & Research Libraries, 61(4), 359-365.
7. Grafton, A. (1997). The footnote*: A curious history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review. London: Sage.
9. Kahle, B. (1997). Preserving the Internet. Scientific American, 276(3), 72-74.
10. Kellehear, A. (1993). The unobtrusive researcher: A guide to methods. St. Leonards, UK: Allen & Unwin.
11. Koehler, W. (1999). An analysis of Web page and Web site constancy and permanence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 162-180.
12. Koehler, W. (2002). Web page change and persistence: A four-year longitudinal study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 162-171.
13. Koehler, W. (2004). A longitudinal study of Web pages continued: A consideration of document persistence. Information Research, 9(2), Article 174. Retrieved May 4, 2004, from http://informationr.net/ir/9-2/paper174.html
14. Koehler, W., Anderson, A.D., Dowdy, B.A., Fields, D.E., Golden, M., Hall, D., et al. (2000). A profile in statistics of journal articles: Fifty years of American documentation and the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics (Cybermetrics), 4(1), Article 3. Retrieved May 5, 2004, from http://web.archive.org/web/20030623200359/http://www.cindoc.csic.es/ cybermetrics/articles/v20030623200354i20030623200351p20030623200353.html
15. Landlow, G.P. (1996). Twenty minutes into the future: How we are moving beyond the book. In G. Nunberg (Ed.), The future of the book (pp. 296-313). Berkeley, CA: University of California.
16. Lawrence, S., Coetzee, F., Glover, E., Pennock, D.M., Flake, G., & Nielsen, F. (2001). Persistence of Web references in scientific research. IEEE Computer, 34(2), 26-31.
17. Markwell, J., & Brooks, D.W. (2002). Broken links: The ephemeral nature of educational WWW hyperlinks. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, 105-108.
18. Markwell, J., & Brooks, D.W. (2003). Link rot limits the usefulness of Web-based educational material in biochemistry and molecular biology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 31, 69-72.
19. Metcalfe, M. (2003, January). Author(ity): The literature review as expert witnesses. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(1). Retrieved May 8, 2004, from http://web.archive.org/web/20030321172332/http://qualitativeresearch. net/fqs-texte/20030321172331-20030321172303/20030321172331- 20030321172303metcalfe-e.htm
20. Newby, T., & Ertmer, P. (1997). Practical research: Planning and design. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
21. Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing Web usability: The practice of simplicity. New York: New Riders Publishing.
22. Nunberg, G. (1996). Farwell to the information age. In G. Nunberg (Ed.), The future of the book (pp. 103-138). Berkeley, CA: University of California.
23. O'Brien, J.A. (2001). Management information systems: Managing information technology in the internetworked enterprise (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
24. Powell, T. (2003). HTML & XHTML: The complete reference (4th ed.). Berkeley, CA: Osborne/McGraw Hill.
25. Prostan, M. (1958). Why was science backward in the Middle Ages. In J. Lindsay (Ed.), The history of science: Origins and results of the scientific revolution (a symposium) (pp. 25-33). Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
26. Rumsey, M. (2002). Runaway train: Problems of permanence, accessibility, and sustainability in the use of Web sources in Law Review citations. Law Library Journal, 94, 27-39.
27. Spinellis, D. (2003). The decay and failures of Web references. ACM, 46(1), 71-77.
28. Ticehurst, G.W., & Veal, A.J. (2000). Business research methods. Frenchs Forest, Australia: Longman.
29. Turban, E., Mclean, E., Wetherbe, J., Bolloju, N., & Davison, R. (2002). Information technology management: Transforming business in the digital economy. New York: Wiley.
30. Veyne, P. (1988). Did the Greeks believe in their myths. Chicago: University of Chicago.
31. Webster, J., & Watson, R.T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii.
32. Zerby, C. (2002). The devils advocate: A history of footnotes*. NY: Touchstone.
33. Zhang, Y. (1998). The impact of Internet-base electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science: A citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 24(4), 241-254.
34. Zhang, Y. (2001). Scholarly use of Internet-based electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(8), 628-654.