Integrating gender into government budgets: A new perspective

Public Administration Review

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 259-272

  Rubin, Marilyn Marks ^a,c   Bartle, John R ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

^c JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 19944389881     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00452.x     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Axelrod, Donald. 1995. Budgeting for Modern Government. 2nd ed. New York: St. Martin's Press.
2. Balmori, Helena Hofbauer. 2003. Gender and Budgets: Over-view Report. Brighton, UK: BRIDGE, www.ids.ac.uk/bridge/reports/CEP-Budgets-reportw2.doc.
3. Barnett, Kathleen, and Caren Grown. 2004. Gender Impacts of Government Revenue Collection-The Case of Taxation. Economic Paper No. 62, Commonwealth Secretariat.
4. Bellemy, Kate. 2002. Gender Budgeting. Background Paper, Council of Europe's Informal Network of Experts on Gender Budgeting. www.wbg.org.uk/ GBA_Present.htm.
5. Bird, Richard. 1993. Threading the Fiscal Labyrinth: Some Issues in Fiscal Decentralization. National Tax Journal 46(2): 207-27.
6. Budlender, Debbie. 1998. The South African Women's Budget Initiative. Background Paper No. 2, Community Agency for Social Enquiry.
7. _. 2002. A Profile of Country Activities. In Gender Budgets Make Cents: Understanding Gender Responsive Budgets, edited by Debbie Budlender, Diane Elson, Guy Hewitt, and Tanni Mukhopadhyay, 131-64. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
8. _. 2003. Review of Budget Initiatives. Cape Town, South Africa: Community Agency for Social Enquiry.
9. Budlender, Debbie, N. Chobokoane, and Y. Mpetsheni. 2001. A Survey of Time Use: How South African Women and Men Spend Their Time. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
10. _. 2003. Engendering Budgets: A Practitioner's Guide to Understanding and Implementing Gender-Responsive Budgets. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
11. Budlender, Debbie, and Guy Hewitt. 2002. Gender Budgets Make More Cents: Country Studies and Good Practices. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
12. Budlender, Debbie, and Rhonda Sharp, with Kerri Allen. 1998. How to Do a Gender-Sensitive Budget Analysis. Canberra/London: Australian Agency for International Development/Commonwealth Secretariat.
13. Cagatay Nilufer, Mumtaz Keklik, Radhika Lal, and James Lang. 2000. Budgets as if People Mattered: Democratizing Macroeconomic Policies. Conference Paper No. 4, U.N. Development Programme, Social Development and Poverty Elimination Division. www.undp.org/seped/publications/conf_pub.htm.
14. City and County of San Francisco, Board of Supervisors. 2003a. Resolution Urging City Departments to Consider a CEDAW Gender Analysis and Impact on the City's Equal Access to City Services for Limited English Speakers Ordinance Prior to Proposing Departmental Budget Cuts and/or Staff Cuts. www.sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/resolutions03/r0249-03.pdf.
15. _. 2003b. Summary of CEDAW Gender Analyses of Budget Cuts, www.ci.sf.ca.us/site/uploadedfiles/dosw/programs/CEDAW/Gender_Analysis_Reports/ Departments%20Summary%20Budget%20Cuts6-17-03.doc.
16. Diop-Tine, Ngone. 2002. Rwanda: Translating Government Commitments into Action. In Gender Budgets Make More Cents: Country Studies and Good Practices, edited by Debbie Budlender and Guy Hewitt, 117-31. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
17. Elson, Diane. 1999. Gender-Neutral, Gender-Blind, or Gender-Sensitive Budgets? Changing the Conceptual Framework to Include Women's Empowerment and the Economy of Care. Gender Budget Initiative Background Papers. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
18. _. 2002a. Integrating Gender into Government Budgets in the Context of Economic Reform. In Gender Budgets Make Cents: Understanding Gender Responsive Budgets, edited by Debbie Budlender, Diane Elson, Guy Hewitt, and Tanni Mukhopadhyay, 23-47. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
19. _. 2002b. Gender Responsive Budget Initiatives: Some Key Dimensions and Practical Examples. Paper presented at the conference on Gender Budgets, Financial Markets, Financing for Development, February 19-20, Berlin, Germany, http://e-education.unimuenster.de/boell/Elson.doc.
20. Flor, Celia, and Andrea Lizares-Si. 2002. The Philippines: Getting Smart with Local Budgets. In Gender Budgets Make More Cents: Country Studies and Good Practices, edited by Debbie Budlender and Guy Hewitt, 98-116. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
21. Forrester, John P., and Guy B. Adams. 1997. Budget Reform through Organizational Learning: Toward an Organizational Theory of Budgeting. Administration and Society 28(4): 466-88.
22. Gale, William G., and Samara R. Potter. 2002. The Bush Tax Cut: One Year Later. Policy Brief No. 101, Brookings Institution. www.brookings.edu/comm/ policybriefs/pb101.htm.
23. German Agency for Technical Co-operation. 2004. Gender Advisory Project: The Berlin Initiative, www2.gtz.de/gender-budgets/english/ budgetinitiative_berlin.html.
24. Goldman, Tanya. 2000. Customs and Excise. In The Fifth Women's Budget, edited by Debbie Budlender. Cape Town, South Africa: Idasa. www.idasa.org.za/ pdf/940.pdf.
25. Hendricks J. J. 1995. A Response to Manichean Feminism. Administration and Society 27(2): 290-95.
26. Hewitt, Guy, and Tanni Mukhopadhyay. 2002. Promoting Gender Equality through Public Expenditure. In Gender Budgets Make Cents: Understanding Gender Responsive Budgets, edited by Debbie Budlender, Diane Elson, Guy Hewitt, and Tanni Mukhopadhyay, 49-81. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
27. Himmelweit, Susan. 2001. Tools for Budget Impact Analysis: Taxes and Benefits. Paper prepared for the UNIFEM-OECD-Nordic Council-Government of Belgium High Level Conference, October 16-17, Brussels, www.worldbank.org/wbi/ publicfinance/documents/gender/himmelweit.pdf.
28. Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). 2004. Handbook: Parliament, the Budget and Gender. Geneva, Switzerland: IPU. www.ipu.org/english/handbks.htm#budget.
29. Joyce, Philip. 2003. Linking Performance and Budgeting: Opportunities in the Federal Budget Process. Managing for Performance and Results Series. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
30. Kalima, Barbara. 2002. Gender and Debt. Paper presented at the African Forum and Network on Debt and Development, June 27. www.genderandtrade.net/ Africa/Gender_Debt.htm.
31. Klasen, Stephan. 1999. Does Gender Inequality Reduce Growth and Development? Evidence From Cross-Country Regressions. Gender and Development Working Paper No. 7, World Bank, www.worldbank.org/gender/prr/wp7.pdf.
32. Mikesell, John L. 2003. Fiscal Administration: Analysis and Applications for the Public Sector. 6th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishers.
33. Musgrave, Richard A. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO). 2002. Budget Processes in the States. www.nasbo.org/Publications/PDFs/budpro2002.pdf.
35. National Committee on Pay Equity (NCPE). 2004. Still a Man's Labor Market: The Long-Term Earnings Gap. www.iwpr.org/pdf/C355.pdf.
36. National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare (NCPSSM). 2004. Women's Social Security Benefits. www.ncpssm.org/news/archive/ vp_womenandss/.
37. Niu, Meili. 2005. Zero-Based Budgeting in China's Local Governments: A Multiple Case Study. Phd diss., University of Nebraska-Omaha, School of Public Administration.
38. Okun, Arthur. 1975. Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
39. Orosz, Janet Foley. 2001. The Truth Is Out There: Is Post-Modern Budgeting the Real Deal? In Evolving Theories of Public Budgeting, edited by John R. Bartle, 125-55. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
40. Palmer, Ingrid. 1995. Public Finance from a Gender Perspective. World Development 23(11): 1981-86.
41. Rake, Katherine. 2000. Into the Mainstream? New Economy 7(2): 107-10.
42. Rosen, Harvey S. 1995. Public Finance. 4th ed. Chicago: Irwin.
43. San Francisco Commission on the Status of Women. 2000. Local Implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. www.ci.sf.ca.us/site/cosw_page.asp?id=10849.
44. _. 2001. Department of Public Works, Survey Update 2001. sfgov.org/site/cosw_page.asp?id=11456.
45. Sawer, Marian. 2002. Australia: The Mandarin Approach to Gender Budgets. In Gender Budgets Make More Cents: Country Studies and Good Practices, edited by Debbie Budlender and Guy Hewitt, 43-64. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
46. Schick, Allan. 1978. The Road from ZBB. Public Administration Review 38(2): 177-80.
47. _. 1992. The Road to PPB: The Stages of Budget Reform. Reprinted in Government Budgeting: Theory, Process, Politics, 2nd ed., edited by Albert C. Hyde, 46-60. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
48. Sharp, Rhonda. 2003. Budgeting for Equity: Gender Budget Initiative s within a Framework of Performance Oriented Budgeting. New York: U.N. Development Fund for Women.
49. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2000. Economics of the Public Sector. 3rd ed. New York: W.W.Norton.
50. Stivers, Camilla. 1993. Gender Images in Public Administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
51. _. 2000. Bureau Men, Settlement Women: Constructing Public Administration in the Progressive Era. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
52. Stoksky, Janet. 1997. Gender Bias in Tax Systems. Tax Notes International, June 9, 1913.
53. Tanzania Gender Networking Programme (TGNP). 2004. The Case of Gender Budget Initiative, www.tgnp.co.tz/gbi.htm.
54. United Nations. 1995. Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action.www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/plat2.htm.
55. United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM). 2003. A Learning Programme in Action: UNIFEM Gender Responsive Budgeting Programme. Midterm Review Summary Report.
56. United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women (UNDAW). 2004. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/.
57. U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. American Factfinder. http://factfinder.census. gov/home.
58. White, Jay, and Guy B. Adams. 1994. Reason and Postmodernity: The Historical and Social Context of Public Administration Research and Theory. Administrative Theory and Praxis 17(1): 1-19.
59. Wildavsky, Aaron. 1961. Political Implications of Budgetary Reform. Public Administration Review 21(4): 183-90.
60. Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau. 2001. Individual Income Tax Provisions in the States. Information Paper No. 4. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau.
61. World Bank. 2005. WBI Programs: Gender, Decentralization and Public Finance, www.worldbank.org/wbi/publicfinance/decentralization/gender.htm.