Bimodal format effects in working memory

American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 61-77

  Goolkasian, Paula ^a   Foos, Paul W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; HUMAN; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISION;

ATTENTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MEMORY; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 19944384278     PISSN: 00029556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Andrade, J., Kemps, E., Werniers, Y., May, J., & Szmalec, A. (2002). Insensitivity of visual short-term memory to irrelevant visual information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 753-774.
2. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). New York: Academic Press.
3. Baddeley, A. D., & Logic, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multiple-component model. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory (pp. 28-61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Campbell, J. I. D. (1994). Architectures for numerical cognition. Cognition, 53, 1-44.
5. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 233-246.
6. Gardiner, J. M., Gardiner, M. M., & Gregg, V. H. (1983). The auditory recency advantage in longer term free recall is not enhanced by recalling prerecency items first. Memory & Cognition, 11, 616-620.
7. Goolkasian, P., & Foos, P. W. (2002). Presentation format and its effect on working memory. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1096-1105.
8. Goolkasian, P., &Park, D. C. (1980). Processing of visually presented clock times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 707-717.
9. Greene, R. L. (1985). Constraints on the long-term modality effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 526-541.
10. Greene, R. L., & Crowder, R. G. (1986). Recency effects in delayed recall of mouthed stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 14, 355-360.
11. Greene, R. L., Elliott, C. L., & Smith, M. D. (1988). When do interleaved suffixes improve recall? Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 560-571.
12. Hanley, J. R., & Bakopoulou, E. (2003). Irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and phonological similarity: A test of the phonological loop model and the feature model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 435-444.
13. Kroll, J. F., & Corrigan, A. (1981). Strategies in sentence-picture verification: The effect of an unexpected picture. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 515-531.
14. La Pointe, L. B., & Engle, R. W. (1990). Simple and complex word spans as measures of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1118-1133.
15. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
16. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389-401.
18. Melara, R. D., & O'Brien, T. P. (1987). Interaction between synesthetically corresponding dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 323-336.
19. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 156-163.
20. Nairne,J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 251-269.
21. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
22. Paivio, A. (1975). Perceptual comparisons through the mind's eye. Memory & Cognition, 3, 635-647.
23. Paivio, A. (1978). A dual coding approach to perception and cognition. In H. L. Pick & E. Saltzman (Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 39-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Patching, G. R., & Quinlan, P. T. (2002). Garner and congruence effects in the speeded classification of bimodal signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 755-775.
25. Pellegrino, J. W., Rosinski, R. R., Chiesi, H. L., & Siegel, A. (1977). Picture-word differences in decision latency: An analysis of single and dual memory models. Memory & Cognition, 5, 383-396.
26. Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory & Cognition, 17, 398-422.
27. Posner, M. I., Nissen, M.J., & Klein, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157-171.
28. Salame, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 150-164.
29. Smith, M. C., & Magee, L. E. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture-word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 373-392.
30. Turatto, M., Benso, F., Galfano, G., & Umilta, C. (2002). Nonspatial attention shifts between audition and vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 628-639.
31. Wheeler, M. E., & Treisman, A. M. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 48-64.