Multilevel structural equation model for activity participation and travel behavior : Data from the Puget Sound Transportation Panel

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1898, 2004, Pages 52-60

  Chung, Jin Hyuk ^a   Kim, Seongho ^b   Lee, Young Kyun ^a   Choi, Yun Sook ^a  

^a Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

^b Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; DATA REDUCTION; HIGHWAY PLANNING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARDS;

MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS; MULTILEVEL STRUCTURAL EQUATION; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL (SEM); TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 19944374812     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1898-07     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Pas, E. I. State-of-the-Art and Research Opportunities in Travel Demand. Transportation Research, Vol. 19A, 1985, pp. 460-464.
2. Pas, E. I. Recent Advances in Activity-Based Modeling. Proc., Activity-Based Travel Forecasting Conference, Travel Model Improvement Program, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1996, pp. 79-102.
3. Szalai, A. The Use of Time: Daily Activities of Urban and Suburban Populations in Twelve Countries. Mouton, The Hague, Netherlands, 1972.
4. Kostyniuk, L. P., and R. Kitamura. Life Cycle and Household Time-Space Paths: Empirical Investigation. In Transportation Research Record 897, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 28-37.
5. Pas, E. I. The Effects of Selected Socio-Demographic Characteristics on Daily Travel-Behavior. Environment and Planning, Vol. 16A, 1984, pp. 571-581.
6. Zahabi, Y., and J. M. McLynn. Travel Choices under Changing Constraints as predicted by the UMOT Model. Tenth Transportation Planning Research Colloquium, 1983, pp. 14-16.
7. Golob, T. F., and M. G. McNally. A Model of Activity Participation and Travel Interactions Between Household Heads. Transportation Research, Vol. 31B, No. 3, 1997, pp. 177-194.
8. Lu, X., and Pas, E. I. Socio-demographics, Activity Participation and Travel Behavior. Transportation Research, Vol. 33A, 1999, pp. 1-18.
9. Goulias, K. G. Multilevel Analysis of Daily Time Use and Time Allocation to Activity Types Accounting for Complex Covariance Structures Using Correlated Random Effects. Transportation, Vol. 29, 2002, pp. 31-48.
10. Golob, T. F. Structural Equation Modeling for Travel Behavior Research. Transportation Research, Vol. 37B, 2003, pp. 1-25.
11. Den Boon, A. K. Opvattingen over Autogrebruik en Mulieuvervuiling. Baschwitz Institute for Public Opinion and Mass Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1980.
12. Kitamura, R., J. P. Robinson, T. F. Golob, M. A. Bradley, J. Leonard, and T. van der Hoorn. A Comparative Analysis of Time Use Data in the Netherlands and California. Proc., 20th PTRC Summer Annual Meeting: Transportation Planning Methods, PTRC Education and Research Service, Ltd., London, 1992, pp. 127-138.
13. Golob, T. F., R. Kitamura, and C. V. Lula. Modeling the Effects of Commuting Time on Activity Durations and Nonwork Travel. Presented at 73rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1994.
14. Fujii, S., R. Kitamura, and K. Kishizawa. Analysis of Individual's Joint-Activity Engagement Using a Model System of Activity-Travel Behavior and Time Use. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1676, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 11-19.
15. Bryk, A. S., and S. W. Raudenbush. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif., 1996.
16. Tom, A. B., and R. J. Bosker. Multilevel Analysis, Sage Publications, London, 1999.
17. Goulias, K. G., and T. G. Kim. Multilevel Analysis of Activity and Travel Patterns: Accounting for Person- and Household-Specific Observed and Unobserved Effects Simultaneously. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1752, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 23-31.
18. Schwanen, T., and M. Dijst. Travel-Time Ratios for Visits to the Workplace: The Relationship Between Commuting Time and Work Duration. Transportation Research, Vol. 36A, 2002, pp. 573-592.
19. Bhat, C. R., and H. Zhao. The Spatial Analysis of Activity Stop Generation. Transportation Research, Vol. 36B, 2002, pp. 557-575.
20. Ma, J., and K. G. Goulias. Application of Poisson Regression Models to Activity Frequency Analysis and Prediction. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1676, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 86-94.
21. Murakami, E., and W. T. Watterson. Developing a Household Travel Panel Survey for the Puget Sound Region. In Transportation Research Record 1285, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 40-46.
22. Muthen, B. O., and L. Muthen. Mplus User Guide. Los Angeles, Calif., 1998.
23. Marcoulides, G. A., and R. E. Schumacker (eds.). New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, N.J., 2001, pp. 89-127.
24. Joreskog, K. G., and D. Sorbom. LISREL 8. Scientific Software International, Inc., Chicago, Ill., 1995.
25. Golob, T. F. The Dynamics of Travel Time Expenditures and Car Ownership Decision. Transportation Research, Vol. 24A, 1999, pp. 443-463.
26. Golob, T. F. A Simultaneous Model of Household Activity Participation and Trip Chain Generation. Transportation Research, Vol. 34B, 2000, pp. 355-376.
27. Chung, J.-H., and Y. Ahn. Structural Equation Models of Day-to-Day Activity Participation and Travel Behavior in a Developing Country. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1807, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 109-118.