Alternative models for toxicity testing of xenobiotics

Arhiv za Higijenu Rada i Toksikologiju

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 195-204

  Kniewald, Jasna ^a   Kmetič, Ivana ^a   Gaurina Srček, Višnja ^a   Kniewald, Zlatko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Alternative methods; Biomarkers; In vitro methods; Predicting toxic hazard; Validation

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; XENOBIOTIC AGENT;

ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVE; ANIMAL TESTING REPLACEMENT; APOPTOSIS; BIOASSAY; CELL CULTURE; CELL FRACTIONATION; CELL LINE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA BASE; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; GENOTOXICITY; METABOLISM; NONHUMAN; ORGAN CULTURE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY; TISSUE CULTURE; TISSUE SLICE; TOXICITY TESTING; TOXICOKINETICS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVES; TOXICITY TESTS; XENOBIOTICS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 19944372708     PISSN: 00041254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Watson RR, editor. In vitro methods of toxicology. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1992.
2. O'Hare S, Atterwill CK, editors. In vitro toxicity testing protocols. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press Inc.; 1995.
3. Gad SC. Alternatives to in vivo studies in toxicology. In: Ballantyne B, Marrs T, Turner P editors. General and Applied Toxicology. Volume 1. Basingstoke (UK): Macmillan; 1993. p. 179-206.
4. Garle MJ, Fentern JH, Fry JR. In vitro cytotoxicity tests for the prediction of acute toxicity. Toxicol In Vitro 1994;8:1303-12.
5. Walum E, Clemedson C, Ekwall B. Principles for the validation of in vitro toxicology test methods. Toxicol In Vitro 1994;8:807-12.
6. Balls M, Blaauboer BJ, Fentem JH, Bruner L, Combes RD, Ekwall B, Fielder RJ, Guillouzo A, Lewis RW, Lovell DP, Reinhardt CA, Repetto G, Sladowski D, Spielman H, Zucco F. Practical aspects of the validation of toxicity test procedures. Altern Lab Anim 1995;23:129-47.
7. Kreger M. Alternative methods databases: Internet resources that are more than links to other sites. AWIC Bulletin 2000 [cited June 2004]. Available from: http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/newsletters/
8. Janusch A, van der Kamp MDO, Bottrill K, Grune B, Anderson DC, Ekwall B, Howald M, Kolar R, Kuiper JD, Larson J, Loprieno G, Sauer UG, Smith AJ, van der Valk JBF. Current status and future developments of databases on alternative methods. Altern Lab Anim 1997;25:411-22.
9. Todd M, Garthoff B, Bemhardt W, Bode G, Fair S, Kolar R, Lumley C, Pieters M, Rogiers V Sauer CJ, Spielman H, Straus J, Warngard L. ATLA 1998;26:13-20.
10. Anon. ECVAM News&Views. Altern Lab Anim 1994;22:7-11.
11. Cooper-Hannan R, Harbell JW, Coecke S, Balls M, Bowe G, Cervinka M, Clothier R, Hermann F, Klahm LK, de Lange J, Liebsch M, Vanparys P. The principles of good laboratory practice: Application to in vitro toxicology studies. Altern Lab Anim 1999;27:539-77.
12. Testing MFW, Baumans V, Combes RD, Halder M, Hendriksen CFM, Howard BR, Lovell DP, Moore GJ, Overend P, Wilson MS. Reducing the use of laboratory animals in biomedical research: problems and possible solutions. Altern Lab Anim 1998;26:283-301.
13. Lumley CE, van Cauteren H. Harmonisation of international toxicity testing guidelines for pharmaceuticals: contribution to refinement and reduction in animal use. EBRA Bulletin November 1997. p. 4-9.
14. Balls M, Goldberg AM, Fentem JH, Broadhead CL, Burch RL, Festing MFW, Frazier JM, Hendriksen CFM, Jennings M, van der Kamp MDO, Morton DB, Rowan AN, Russell C, Russell WMS, Spielman H, Stephens ML, Stokes WS, Straughan DW, Yager JD, Zurlo J, van Zutphen BFM. The three Rs: the way forward. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 11. Altern Lab Anim 1995;23:838-66.
15. Kniewald J, Jakominić M, Tomljenović A, Šimić B, Romac P, Vranešić D, Kniewald Z. Disorders of male reproductive tract under the influence of atrazine. J Appl Toxicol 2000;20:61-8.
16. Anon. OECD Guidelines for testing of chemicals, Guideline 422: Combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test. Paris: OECD; 1993.
17. Kmetič I, Gaurina-Srček V, Šimić B, Kniewald Z, Kniewald J. Cytotoxic effects of organochlorine insecticides in Baby Hamster Kidney (BHK 21 C13) cell line. In: Kniewald Z et al., editors. Current Studies of Biotechnology. Volume 3 - Food. Zagreb: Croatian Society of Biotechnology and Medicinska naklada; 2003. p. 177-84.
18. Brown NA, Spielmann H, Beehrter R, Flint OP, Freeman SJ, Jelinek RJ, Koch E, Nau H, Newall DR, Palmer AK, Renault J-Y, Repetto MF Vogel R, Wiger R. Screening chemicals for reproductive toxicity: the current alternatives. Altern Lab Anim 1995;23:868-82.
19. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Biological markers in environmental health research. Environ Health Perspect 1987;74:3-9.
20. Hulka BS, Wilcosky T. Biological markers in epidemiologic research. Arch Environ Health 1989;43:83-9.
21. Willet WC, The use of biomarkers in nutritional epidemiology. In: Kok FJ, van't Veer R editors. Biomarkers of dietary exposure. London (UK): Smith-Gordon; 1991. p.9-14.
22. Greenwald R Witkin KM, Malone WF, Byar DP, Freedman LS, Stern HR. The study of markers of biological effects in cancer prevention research trials, Int J Cancer 1992;52:189-96.
23. Bottrill K. The use of biomarkers as alternatives to current animal tests on food chemicals. Altern Lab Anim 1998;26:421-80.
24. Benford DJ, Hanley AB, Bottrill K, Oehlschlager S, Balls M, Branca F, Castegnaro JJ, Descontes J, Hemminiki K, Lindsay D, Schilter B. Biomarkers as predictive tools in toxicity testing. Altern Lab Anim 2000;28:119-31.