Testing alleged mediumship: Methods and results

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 96, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 165-179

  O'Keeffe, Ciarán ^a   Wiseman, Richard ^b  

^a LIVERPOOL HOPE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RELIGION; REVIEW;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPIRITUALISM;

EID: 19944369788     PISSN: 20448295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000712605X36361     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Alison, L. J., Smith, M. D., & Morgan, K. (2003). Interpreting the accuracy of offender profiles. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9, 185-195.
2. Blackmore, S. (1994). Probability misjudgement and belief in the paranormal: Is the theory all wrong? In D. Bierman (Ed.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association (pp. 72-82).
3. Brown, I (2001, March 5). Hearing from dearly departed proves a hit on Sci-Fi Channel. Los Angeles Times.
4. Forer, B. R. (1949). The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 118-123.
5. Furnham, A., & Schofield, S. (1987). Accepting personality test feedback: A review of the Barnum effect. Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 6, 162-178.
6. Gardner, M. (1992). On the wild side. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
7. Greville, T. N. E. (1949). On the number of sets required for testing the significance of verbal material. Journal of Parapsychology, 13, 137-138.
8. Hodgson, R. (1892). A record of certain phenomena of trance. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 8, 1-167.
9. Hodgson, R. (1898). A further record of observations of certain phenomena of trance. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 13, 284-582.
10. Hyman, R. (1977). Cold reading: How to convince strangers that you know all about them. Skeptical Inquirer, 1, 18-37.
11. Hyman, R. (2002). How not to test mediums: Critiquing the afterlife experiments. Skeptical Inquirer, 26(1).
12. Hyman, R. (2003). Hyman's reply to Schwartz's 'how not to review mediumship research'. Skeptical Inquirer, 27(3), 61-64.
13. Hyslop, J. H. (1919). Chance coincidence and guessing in a mediumistic experiment. Proceedings of the American Society for Psychical Research, 13, 5-88.
14. Milton, J., & Wiseman, R. (1997). Guidelines for extrasensory perception research. Hatfield, England: University of Hertfordshire Press.
15. Morris, R. (1986). What psi is not: The necessity for experiments. In H. T. Edge, R. L. Morris, J. Palmer & J. H. Rush (Eds.), Foundations of parapsychology. London: Routledge & Kcgan Paul.
16. Newport, F., & Strausberg, M (2001, June 8). Americans' belief in psychic and paranormal phenomena is up over last decade. Report by The Gallup Organisation.
17. Podmore, F. (1901). On Professor Hyslop's report on his sittings with Mrs. Piper. Proceedings of Society for Psychical Research, 17, 374-388.
18. Pratt, J. G. (1936). Towards a method of evaluating mediumistic material. Bulletin of the Boston Society for Psychic Research, 23, 5-53.
19. Pratt, J. G. (1969). On the evaluation of verbal material in parapsychology (Parapsychology Monograph No 10). New York: Parapsychology Foundation.
20. Pratt, J. G., & Birge, W. R. (1948). Appraising verbal test material in parapsychology. Journal of Parapsychology, 12, 236-256.
21. Roe, C. A. (1998). Belief in the paranormal and attendance at psychic readings. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 92(1), 25-51.
22. Rowland, I. (1998). The full facts book of cold reading. London, England: Ian Roland.
23. Saltmarsh, H. F., & Soal, S. G. (1930). A method of estimating the supernormal content of mediumistic communications. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 39, 266-271.
24. Schouten, S. A. (1994). An overview of quantitatively evaluated studies with mediums and psychics. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 88, 221-254.
25. Schwanz, G. E. (2003). How not to review mediumship research. Skeptical Inquirer, 27(3), 58-61.
26. Schwartz, G. E. R., Russek, L. G. S., Nelson, L. A., & Barentsen, C. (2001). Accuracy and replicability of anomalous after-death communication across highly skilled mediums. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 65(862), 1-25.
27. Scott, C. (1972). On the evaluation of verbal material in parapsychology: A discussion of Dr Pratt's monograph. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 46(752), 79-90.
28. Thouless, R. H. (1949). Review of Journal of Parapsychology, Vol. 12, Number 4. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 35, 48-49.
29. Wiseman, R., & O'Keeffe, C. (2001). Accuracy and replicability of anomalous after-death communication across highly skilled mediums: A critique. Paranormal Review, 19, 3-6.
30. Wooffit, R. (1992). Telling tales of the unexpected: The organisation of factual discourse. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
31. Wooffit, R. (2001). Raising the dead: Reported speech in medium-sitter interaction. Discourse Studies, 3, 351-374.
32. Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Garb, H. N. (2003). The Rorschach Inkblot test, fortune tellers, and cold reading. Skeptical Inquirer, 27(4), 29-33.