Dynamic assembly of learning objects

Thirteenth International World Wide Web Conference Proceedings, WWW2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 894-901

  Farrell, Robert ^a   Liburd, Soyini D ^b   Thomas, John C ^a  

^a IBM RESEARCH   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assembly; Content Management; Data Retrieval; Information Retrieval; Instruction; Learning Object; Linking; LOM; Metadata; Organization; RDF; Semantic Web

Indexed keywords

CONTENT MANAGEMENT; DATA RETRIEVAL; INSTRUCTION; LEARNING OBJECT; LINKING; LOM; RDF; SEMANTIC WEB;

ASSEMBLY; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); GRAPH THEORY; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; METADATA; PROBLEM SOLVING; SEMANTICS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; WORLD WIDE WEB; XML;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 19944369445     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. [Wiley] Wiley, D.A. (ed.) The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Agency for Instructional Technology, Bloomington, IN. 2002. http://reusability. org/read/
2. [Farrell] Farrell, R. et.al. Learner-driven Assembly of Web-based Courseware". Proceedings of E-Learn 2003 (Phoenix AZ, Nov 2003).
3. [Rieman] Rieman, J. A Field Study of Exploratory Learning Strategies. TOCHI 3(3): 189-218 (1996)
4. [Carroll] Carroll, J.M. The Nurnberg Funnel: designing minimalist instruction for practical computer skill. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1990.
5. [Chamey] Charney, D. The Impact of Hypertext on Processes of Reading and Writing. In Literacy and Computers Hilligoss and Selfe (Eds.) New York: Modern Language Association, 1994. pp. 238-263.
6. [Foltz] Foltz, P.W. Comprehension, coherence, and strategies in hypertext and linear text. In J. Levonnen, J.F. Rouet, A. Dillon & R. Spiro (Eds.) Hypertext and Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 1996.
7. [Hammond] Hammond, N., & Allinson, L., Extending hypertext for learning: An investigation of access and guidance tools. In People and Computers V, Nottingham, UK. 1989.
8. [Mayer] Mayer, R.E. (1979). Can advance organizers influence meaningful learning? Review of Educational Research, 49, 371-383.
9. Merrill, M.D. Component Display Theory. In C. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, 1983.
10. [Bloom] Bloom, B.S.(ed.) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I, Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman. 1956.
11. [Brookfield] Brookfield, S., D. (1986) Understanding and Facilitating Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. th Annual ACM Special Interest Group in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) Conference, Tempere, Finland.
13. Farrell, R., et.al. Implementing and Extending Learning Object Metadata For Learning-directed Assembly of Computer-based Training. In "Learning Technology Newsletter" of the IEEE Computer Society, Learning Technology Task Force (LTTF), January, 2003. ISSN 1438-0625, http://lttf.ieee.org/ learn_tech/issues/january2003/#5
14. IBM Redbooks Web site, http://www.redbooks.ibm.com.
15. IBM Websphere software platform, http://www.ibm.com/websphere.
16. DocBook XML http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/
17. OWL Web Ontology Language overview, http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-owl- features-20030818/.
18. IEEE P1484.12.3/D1, 2002-12-15 Draft Standard for XML Binding for Learning Object Metadata Data Model, http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/.
19. [LOM] IEEE 1484.12.1-2002 Learning Object v1 Metadata Final Draft, http://ltsc.ieee.org/doc/wg12/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draf t.pdf
20. [IMS] IMS Content Packaging specification v1.1.3 final http://www.imsglobal.org/content/packaging/index.cfm
21. [RDF] Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification. http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222, W3C Recommendation. February 22, 1999.
22. [RDFS] RDF Vocabulary Description Language: RDF Schema 1.0, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/
23. [RDFLOM] RDF binding of LOM Metadata. http://kmr.nada.kth.se/el/ims/ metadata.html, IEEE draft proposal, August 26, 2002.
24. [Dumais] Dumais, S.T., Cutrell, E. and Chen, H. (2001) Bringing order to the web: Optimizing search by showing results in context. In Proceedings of CHI'01, Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 2001, pp. 277-283.
25. [Stoj] Stojanovic, L., Staab, S., and Studer, R. Elearning based on the Semantic Web. World Conference on the WWW and Internet (WebNet), Orlando, Florida, USA, 2001.
26. .Goh, S. Bressan, S. Madnick, M. Siegel, Context interchange: representing and reasoning about data semantics in heterogeneous systems, Sloan School Working Paper #3928, Sloan School of Management, MIT, 50 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02139, Oct. 1996.
27. Andersson, M. Person Plus Web - Samples From Everyday Life. Word Conference on e-Learning (e-Learn), Phoenix, AZ., 2003.
28. Bruner, J., Actual Minds, Possible Words (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 1986.
29. Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., and Vassileva, J. (eds.) (1998) Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia.
30. De Bra, P., Aerts, A., Berden, B., De Lange, B., Rousseau, B., Santic, T., Smits, D., Stash, N., AHA! The Adaptive Hypermedia Architecture. Proceedings of the ACM Hypertext Conference, Nottingham, UK, August 2003.