Mass balance equilibration: A robust approach using contaminated distribution

AIChE Journal

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1569-1575

  Ragot, José ^a   Chadli, Mohammed ^a   Maquin, Didier ^a  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHE EN AUTOMATIQUE DE NANCY   (France)

Author keywords

Contaminated distribution; Data reconciliation; Process control

Indexed keywords

PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 19844379335     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.10412     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Narasimhan S, Jordache C. Data Reconciliation and Gross Error Detection. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing; 2000.
2. Ragot J, Darouach M, Maquin D, Bloch G. Validation de données et diagnostic. Paris, France: Hermès; 1990.
3. Romagnoli J, Sanchez M. Data Processing and Reconciliation for Chemical Process. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2000.
4. Bagajewicz MJ. Process Plant Instrumentation: Design and Upgrade. Lancaster, PA: Technomic; 2000.
5. Albuquerque J, Biegler LT. Data reconciliation and gross errors detection for dynamic systems. AIChE J. 1996;42:2841-2856.
6. Jordache C, Ternet D, Brown S. Efficient gross error elimination methods for rigorous on-line optimization. Proc of Escape 11, Kolding, Denmark; 2001.
7. Narasimhan S, Harikumar P. A method to incorporate bounds in data reconciliation and gross error detection. Comput Chem Eng. 1993;17: 115-1120.
8. Hampel FR, Ronchetti EM, Rousseeuw PJ, Stohel WA. Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions. New York, NJ: Wiley; 1986.
9. Goodall C. M-estimators of location: An outline of the theory. In: Hoaglin D, Mosteller F, Tukey JW, eds. Understanding Robust and Explanatory Data Analysis. New York, NY: Wiley; 1983:339-403.
10. Hubert P. Robust Statistics. New York, NY: Wiley; 1981.
11. Tjoa IB, Biegler LT. Simultaneous strategy for data reconciliation and gross error analysis. Comput Chem Eng. 1991;15:679-689.
12. Singhal A, Seborg DE. Dynamic data rectification using the expectation maximisation algorithm. Technical report PC-101. Berkeley, CA: Dept. of Chemical Engineering, University of California; 2000.
13. Wang D, Romagnoli J. Robust data reconciliation based on a generalized objective function. Proc of the 15th IFAC Triennal World Congress, Barcelona, Spain; 2002.
14. Soderstrom T, Young R, Russo L, Edgar TF. Industrial application of a large-scale dynamic data reconciliation strategy. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2000;39:1683-1693.
15. Ghosh-Dastider B, Schafer JL. Outlier detection and editing procedure for continuous multivariate data. Working paper 07. Princeton, NJ: Office of Population Research, Princeton University; 2003.
16. Mah RSH, Stanley GM, Downing D. Reconciliation and rectification of process flow and inventory data. Ind Eng Chem Proc Des Dev. 1976;15:175-183.
17. Hodouin D, Flament F. New developments in material balance calculations for mineral processing industry. Proc of the Society of Mining Engineers Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, February 27-March 2; 1989.
18. Crowe CM. Data reconciliation - Progress and challenges. J Process Control 1996;6:89-98.
19. Maquin D, Bloch G, Ragot J. Data reconciliation for measurements. Eur J Diagn Safety Automat. 1991;1:145-181.
20. Tukey JW. A survey of sampling from contaminated distributions. In: Olkin I, Ghury SG, Hoeffding W, Madow WG, Mann HB, eds. Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press; 1960;448-485.
21. Smith HW, Lewis CL. Computer adjustment of metallurgical balances. Can Inst Mining Metall Bull, 1973;66:97-100.