Solving kinetic inversion problems via a physically bounded Gauss - Newton (PGN) method

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 44, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 3626-3637

  Tang, Weiyong ^a   Zhang, Libin ^a   Linninger, Andreas A ^a   Tranter, Robert S ^a,b   Brezinsky, Kenneth ^a  

^a 1120 Science and Engineering Offices   (United States)

^b ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX NETWORKS; ELEVATED PRESSURES; KINETIC PARAMETERS; PHYSICALLY BOUNDED GAUSS-NEWTON (PGN) METHOD;

ALGORITHMS; DATA ACQUISITION; ETHANE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; OXIDATION; PRESSURE EFFECTS; PROBLEM SOLVING; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

INVERSE KINEMATICS;

MATHEMATICAL METHOD;

EID: 19844378465     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie048872n     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Steinfeld, J. I.; Francisco, J. S.; Hase, W. L. Chemical Kinetics and Dynamics, 2nd Edition; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999.
2. Lisy, J. M.; Simon, P. Evaluation of Parameters in Nonlinear Models by the Least Square Method. Comput. Chem. 1998, 22, 509.
3. Farinha, J. P. S.; Martinho, J. M. G.; Pogliani, L. Nonlinear Least Squares and Chemical Kinetics. J. Math. Chem. 1997, 21, 131.
4. Tadi, M.; Yetter, R. A. Evaluation of the Rate Constants in Chemical Reactions. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1998, 30, 151.
5. Tadi, M.; Cai, W. Inverse Matrix Evaluation for Linear Systems. Inverse Probl. Eng. 1998, 6, 15.
6. Cervantes, A. M.; Waechter, A.; Tutuncu, R.; Biegler, L. T. A Reduced Space Interior Point Strategy for Optimization of Differential Algebraic Systems. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24, 39.
7. Arora, N.; Biegler, L. T. A Trust Region SQP Algorithm for Equality Constrained Parameter Estimation with Simple Parameter Bounds. Comput. Optim. Appl. 2004, 28, 51.
8. Arora, N.; Biegler, L. T. Parameter Estimation for a Polymerization Reactor Model with a Composite-Step Trust-Region NLP Algorithm. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 3616.
9. Locatelli, M. Simulated Annealing Algorithm for Continuous Global Optimization: Convergence Conditions. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 2000, 104, 121.
10. Eftaxias, A.; Font, J.; Fortuny, A.; Fabregat, A.; Stuber, F. Nonlinear Kinetic Parameter Estimation Using Simulated Annealing. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2002, 26, 1725.
11. Terry, D. B.; Messina, M. Heuristic Search Algorithm for Determination of Rate Constants and Reaction Mechanisms from Limited Concentration Data. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 1232.
12. Alper, J. S.; Gelb, R. I. Monte Carlo Method for the Determination of Confidence Intervals: Analysis of Nonnormally Distributed Errors in Sequential Experiments. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 104.
13. Frenklach, M.; Wang, H.; Rabinowitz, M. J. Optimization and Analysis of Large Chemical Kinetic Mechanisms Using the Solution Mapping Method: Combustion of Methane. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 1992, 18, 47.
14. Eiteneer, B.; Frenklach, M. Experimental and Modeling Study of Shock Tube Oxidation of Acetylene. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2003, 35, 391.
15. Shenvi, N.; Geremia, J. M.; Rabitz, H. Nonlinear Kinetic Parameter Identification through Map Inversion. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 12315.
16. Esposito, W. R.; Floudas, C. A. Global Optimization for the Parameter Estimation of Differential-Algebraic Systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39, 1291.
17. Papamichail, I.; Adjiman, C. S. Global Optimization of Dynamic Systems. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2004, 28, 403.
18. Lucia, A.; Feng, Y. Global Terrain Methods. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2002, 26, 529.
19. Lucia, A.; Feng, Y. Multivariable Terrain Methods. AIChE J. 2003, 49, 2553.
20. Kearfott, R. B. Rigorous Global Search: Continuous; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996.
21. Esposito, W. R.; Floudas, C. A. Parameter Estimation in Nonlinear Algebraic Models via Global Optimization. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2002, 22, 213.
22. Caracotsios, M.; Stewart, W. E. Sensitivity Analysis of Initial Value Problems with Mixed ODEs and Algebraic Equations. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1985, 9, 359.
23. Li, S.; Petzold, L. R. Software and Algorithms for Sensitivity Analysis of Large-Scale Differential Algebraic Systems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2000, 725, 131.
24. Leis, J. R.; Kramer, M. A. Sensitivity Analysis of Systems of Differential and Algebraic Equations. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1985, 9, 93.
25. Saltelli, A.; Chan, K.; Scott, M. Sensitivity Analysis; Wiley: New York, 2000.
26. Dennis, J. E.; Schnabel, R. B. Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations; SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 1996.
27. Petzold, L. R. A Description of DASSL, Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND82-8637, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1982.
28. Kee, R. J.; Rupley, F. M.; Miller, J. A. Chemkin-II: A Fortran Chemical Kinetics Package for the Analysis of Gas-Phase Chemical Kinetics, Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND89-8009, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1990.
29. Lin, C. J.; More, J. Newton's Method for Large Bound-Constrained Optimization Problems. SIAM J. Optim. 1999 9, 1100.
30. Zhu, C.; Byrd, R. H.; Nocedal, J. L-BFGS - B: Fortran Routines for Large Scale Bound Constrained Optimization. ACM Trans. Math. Soft. 1997, 23, 550.
31. Byrd, R. H.; Lu, P.; Nocedal, J. A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 1995, 16, 1190.
32. Tranter, R. S.; Tang, W.; Anderson, K. B.; Brezinsky, K. Shock Tube Study Thermal Rearrangement of 1,5-Hexadiyne over Wide Pressure and Temperature Range. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 3406.
33. Villadsen, J. V.; Michelsen, M. L. Solution of Differential Equations by Polynomial Approximation; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1978.
34. Sahinidis,.V. BARON: A General Purpose Global Optimization Software Package. J. Glob. Optim. 1996, 8, 201.
35. Vakhtin, A. B. The Rate Constant for the Recombination of Trifluoromethyl at T = 296 K. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1996, 28, 443.
36. Lucia, A.; DiMaggio, P. A.; Depa, P. Funneling Algorithms for Multiscale Optimization on Rugged Terrains. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 3770.
37. Kim, T. J.; Yetter, R. A.; Dryer, F. L. New Results on Moist CO Oxidation. Proc. Combust. Inst. 1994, 25, 759.
38. Smith, G. P.; Golden, D. M.; Frenklach, M.; Moriarty, N. W.; Eiteneer, B.; Goldenberg, M.; Bowman, C. T.; Hanson, R. K.; Song, S.; Gardiner, W. C. Jr.; Lissianski, V. V.; Qin, Z. http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech/, accessed in 2004.
39. Tranter, R. S.; Sivaramakrishnan, R.; Brezinsky, K.; Allendorf, M. D. High Pressure, High-Temperature Shock Tube Studies of Ethane Pyrolysis and Oxidation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 2001.
40. Wagner, A. F. The Challenges of Combustion for Chemical Theory. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2002, 29, 1173.
41. Piling, M. J.; Robertson, S. H. Master Equation Models for Chemical Reaction of Importance in Combustion. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2003, 54, 247.
42. Vajda, S.; Rabitz, H. Identifiably and Distinguishability of First-Order Reaction System. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 701.
43. Zsely, I. G.; Zador, J.; Turanyi, T. How Can Very Different Combustion Models Produce Similar Results? Proc. Combust. Inst. 2004, 30, poster 1F2-11.