NCLB implementation challenges: The local superintendent's view

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 156-169

  Cohn, Carl A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 19844374367     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327930pje8002_9     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Benson, D., Erb, J., Erikson, J., Moses, M., Otto, D., Phillips, D., et al. (2004). CPR for the "no child" law. Education Week, 23(36), 32-35.
2. Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483, 74 S. Ct. 686, 98 L. Ed. 2d. 873 (1954).
3. Casserly, M. (2004, Summer). Driving change. Education Next, pp. 32-37.
4. Center on Education Policy. (2003). A first look inside 15 school districts in 2002-2003. Washington, DC: Author.
5. Children's Defense Fund. (2004, February 6). Robin Hood in reverse: Bush administration budget choices take from poor children to give to the rich. 2005 Budget Analysis.
6. Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Teaching quality matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(2), 95-98.
7. Debray, E. (2005/this issue). NCLB accountability collides with court-ordered desegregation: The case of Pinella County, Florida. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(2), XXX-XXX.
8. Don't turn back the clock: NCLB. Not perfect but hugely important. (2003). [A letter to the Congress. Signed by African American and Latino Superintendents and Civic Leaders.] Retrieved March 5, 2004, from http:// www2.edtrust.org/NR/rdondyres/D4EA0468-953D-4580-8E86-434925A6E8AD/0/ FINALSIGNERS.pdf
9. Farkas, S., Johnson, J., Duffet A., Syat, B., & Vine, J. (2003). Rolling up their sleeves: Super-intendents and principals talk about what's needed to fix public schools. Public Agenda. Retrieved March 7, 2004, from http://www.wallacefunds.org/NR/rdonlyres/ B51FB0B9D280-4ED8-B276-8BB2ED4872E9/0/rolling_up_their_sleeves.pdf
10. Howell, W. (2004, Spring). Where the rubber meets the road. Education Next, pp. 26-31.
11. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110 (2002).
12. Novak, J., & Fuller, B. (2003). Penalizing diverse schools? PACE Policy Brief, 03-4, 1-11.
13. Orfield, G. (2004). Introduction to Sunderman and Kim. Inspiring vision, disappointing results: Four studies on implementing the No Child Left Behind act. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard. 1-9.
14. Rossi, R. (2003, August 29). To Duncan, No Child Behind law is "burdensome" and "impractical." Chicago Sun-Times, p. B1.
15. Scherer, M. (2004). A call for powerful leaders: A conversation with Rod Paige. Educational Leadership, 61(7), 20-23.
16. Sunderman, G., & Kim, J. (2004). Increasing bureaucracy or increasing opportunities? School district experience with supplemental educational services. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard.
17. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). No Child Left Behind: A desktop reference. Washington, DC: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education.
18. West, M., & Peterson, P. (2003). The politics and practice of accountability. In M. West & P. Peterson (Eds.), No Child Left Behind? The politics and practice of accountability (pp. 1-20). Washington, DC: Brookings.