Cross-sectional dependency and size distortion in a small-sample homogeneous panel data unit root test

Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 369-392

  Jönsson, Kristian ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 19844367606     PISSN: 03059049     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2005.00124.x     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Atkinson, S. E. and Wilson, P. W. (1992). 'The bias of bootstrapped versus conventional standard errors in the general linear and SUR models', Econometric Theory, Vol. 8, pp. 258-275.
2. Bai, J. and Ng, S. (2004). 'A PANIC attack on unit roots and cointegration', Econometrica, Vol. 72, pp. 1127-1177.
3. Baltagi, B. H. and Kao, C. (2000). Nonstationary Panels, Cointegration in Panels and Dynamic Panels: A Survey, Working Paper No. 16, Center for Policy Research.
4. Beck, N. and Katz, J. N. (1995). 'What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data', American Political Science Review, Vol. 89, pp. 634-647.
5. Breuer, J. B., McNown, R. and Wallace, M. (2002). 'Series-specific unit root tests with panel data', Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 64, pp. 527-546.
6. Campbell, J. Y. and Perron, P. (1991). 'Pitfalls and opportunities: what macroeconomists should know about unit roots', NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Vol. 6, pp. 141-201.
7. Elliot, G., Rothenberg, T. J. and Stock, J. H. (1996). 'Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root', Econometrica, Vol. 64, pp. 813-836.
8. Hall, R. E. (1978). 'Stochastic implications of the life cycle permanent income hypothesis: theory and evidence', Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 86, pp. 971-987.
9. Harvey, A. and Bates, D. (2003). Multivariate Unit Root Tests and Testing for Convergence, DAE Working Paper No. 0301 (December 2002), Faculty of Economics and Politics, University of Cambridge.
10. Im, K., Pesaran, M. and Shin, Y. (1997). Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogenous Panels, mimeographed. Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.
11. Im, K., Pesaran, M. and Shin, Y. (2003). 'Testing for unit roots in heterogenous panels', Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 115, pp. 53-74.
12. Karlsson, S. and Löthgren, M. (2000). 'On the power and interpretation of panel unit root tests', Economics Letters, Vol. 66, pp. 249-255.
13. Larsson, R., Lyhagen, J. and L̈thgren, M. (2001). 'Likelihood-based cointegration tests in heterogenous panels', Econometrics Journal, Vol. 4, pp. 109-142.
14. Levin, A. and Lin, C.-F. (1992). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties, Discussion Paper No. 92-93, University of California, San Diego.
15. Levin, A. and Lin, C.-F. (1993). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: New Results, Discussion Paper No. 93-56, University of California, San Diego.
16. Levin, A., Lin, C.-F. and Chu, C.-S. J. (2002). 'Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties', Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 108, pp. 1-24.
17. Moon, R. H. and Perron, B. (2004). 'Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors', Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 122, pp. 81-126.
18. O'Connell, P. G. J. (1998). 'The overvaluation of purchasing power parity', Journal of International Economics, Vol. 44, pp. 1-19.
19. Papell, D. H. (2002). 'The great appreciation, the great depreciation, and the purchasing power parity hypothesis', Journal of International Economics, Vol. 57, pp. 51-82.
20. Pedroni, P. (1997). Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis - New Results, Working Paper in Economics, Department of Economics, Indiana University.
21. Pesaran, M. H. (2000). On the Interpretation of Panel Unit Root Tests (mimeographed), Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.
22. Phillips, P. C. B. and Sul, D. (2003). 'Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence', Econometrics Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 217-259.