Worker insecurity and U.S. Macroeconomic performance during the 1990s

Review of Radical Political Economics

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 155-177

  Setterfield, Mark ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Inflation; Phillips curve; Unemployment; Worker insecurity

Indexed keywords

EID: 19844367052     PISSN: 04866134     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0486613404272631     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Baker, D. 2000. Something new in the 1990s? Looking for evidence of an economic transformation. In Unconventional wisdom: Alternative perspectives on the new economy, ed. J. Madrick. New York: Century Foundation Press.
2. Ball, L., and R. Moffitt. 2001. Productivity growth and the Phillips curve. NBER Working Paper no. 8421. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
3. Blecker, R. 2002. Distribution, demand and growth in neo-Kaleckian macro models. In The economics of demand-led growth: Challenging the supply-side vision of the long run, ed. M. Setterfield. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
4. Block, R. N., J. Beck, and D. H. Kruger. 1996. Labor law, industrial relations and employee choice. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
5. Boddy, R., and J. Crotty. 1975. Class conflict and macro-policy: The political business cycle. Review of Radical Political Economics 7: 1-19.
6. Bowles, S., and R. Boyer. 1988. Labor discipline and aggregate demand: Macroeconomic model. American Economic Review 78: 395-400.
7. Bowles, S., and R. Boyer. 1990. A wage-led employment regime: Income distribution, labour discipline and aggregate demand in welfare capitalism. In The Golden Age of capitalism, ed. S. A. Marglin and J. B. Schor. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
8. Bowles, S., D. M. Gordon, and T. E. Weisskopf. 1990. After the wasteland. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
9. Bronfenbrenner, K. 2000. Uneasy terrain: The impact of capital mobility on workers, wages and union organizing. Report to the U.S. Trade Deficit Review Commission.
10. Chick, V. 2002. An equilibrium of action: A new approach to the long period in Keynes. Mimeograph, University College, London.
11. Chick, V., and M. Caserta. 1997. Provisional equilibrium in macroeconomic theory. In Markets, unemployment and economic policy: Essays in honour of Geoff Harcourt, vol. 2, ed. P. Arestis, G. Palma, and M. Sawyer. London: Routledge.
12. Cornwall, J. 1990. The theory of economic breakdown. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
13. Crandall, R. W. 1993. Manufacturing on the move. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
14. Crotty, J. 1994. Are Keynesian uncertainty and macrotheory compatible? Conventional decision making, institutional structures and conditional stability in Keynesian macromodels. In New perspectives in monetary macroeconomics, ed. G. Dymski and R. Pollin. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
15. Economic report of the president. 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16. Fair, R. 2000. Testing the NAIRU model for the United States. Review of Economic Statistics 82: 64-71.
17. Galbraith, J. K. 1998. Created unequal: The crisis in American pay. New York: Twentieth-Century Fund.
18. Godley, W., and A. Izurieta. 2001. The developing US recession and guidelines for policy. Levy Institute of Strategic Analysis, October.
19. Gordon, R. J. 1998. Foundations of the Goldilocks economy: Supply shocks and the time-varying NAIRU. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2: 297-346.
20. Gordon, R. J. 2000. Does the "new economy" measure up to the great inventions of the past? Journal of Economic Perspectives 14: 49-74.
21. Greenspan, A. 1997. Testimony before the Committee on the Budget, United States Senate, January 21. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve Board.
22. Houston, D. 1992. Is there a new social structure of accumulation? Review of Radical Political Economics 24: 60-67.
23. Howell, D. R. 1999. Theory-driven facts and the growth in earnings inequality. Review of Radical Political Economics 31: 54-86.
24. Kalecki, M. 1971. Costs and prices. In M. Kalecki, Selected essays on the dynamics of the capitalist economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Krugman, P. 2002. For richer. The New York Times, October 20.
26. Lavoie, M. 1992. Foundations of post-Keynesian economic analysis. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
27. Lippit, V. 1997. The reconstruction of a social structure of accumulation in the United States. Review of Radical Political Economics 29: 11-21.
28. Lippit, V. 2003. America's new social structure of accumulation revisited. Paper prepared for Marxism and the World Stage conference, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, November 6-9.
29. Mehron, H., and J. Tracy. 2001. The effect of employee stock options on the evolution of compensation in the 1990s. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review (December): 17-34.
30. Oliner, S. D., and D. E. Sichel. 2000. The resurgence of growth in the late 1990s: Is information technology the story? Journal of Economic Perspectives 14: 3-22.
31. Osterman, P. 1999. Securing prosperity: The American labor market: How it has changed and what to do about it. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
32. Peck, J. 2001. Labour zapped/growth restored? Three moments of neoliberal restructuring in the American labor market. Mimeograph, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
33. Setterfield, M. 1997. Should economists dispense with the notion of equilibrium? Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 20: 47-76.
34. Setterfield, M. 2003a. Critical realism and formal modelling: Incompatible bedfellows? In Applied economics and the critical realist critique, ed. P. Downward. London: Routledge.
35. Setterfield, M. 2003b. Globalization, distributional conflict and inflation: The case of the US economy during the 1990s. In Globalization, regionalism and economic activity, ed. P. Arestis, M. Baddeley, and J. S. L. McCombie. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
36. Setterfield, M., and K. LeBlond. 2003. The Phillips curve and US macroeconomic performance during the 1990s. International Review of Applied Economics 17: 361-76.
37. United Nations. 2000. Human development report. New York: United Nations.