Spin-liquid versus dimerized ground states in a frustrated heisenberg antiferromagnet

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 17, 2004, Pages

  Capriotti, Luca ^a,d   Scalapino, Douglas J ^b   White, Steven R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Credit Suisse group   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIFERROMAGNETISM; DIMERS; EXTRAPOLATION; GROUND STATE; HAMILTONIANS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; TOPOLOGY;

DENSITY MATRIX; NONMAGNETIC PHASES; SPIN EXCITATIONS; SPIN LIQUIDS;

DIMERIZATION;

EID: 19744382567     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.177004     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. C. K. Majumdar and D. K. Ghosh, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 10, 1388 (1969); 10, 1399 (1969).
2. C. K. Majumdar and D. K. Ghosh, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 10, 1388 (1969); 10, 1399 (1969).
3. S. R. White and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. B 54, 9862 (1996).
4. A.W. Sandvik et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 247201 (2002).
5. E. Dagotto and T. M. Rice, Science 271, 618 (1996).
6. We note that spin-liquid phases have been recently detected on triangular and kagome lattices, see, e.g., G. Misguich et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1098 (1998); L. Balents et al. Phys. Rev. B 65, 224412 (2002).
7. We note that spin-liquid phases have been recently detected on triangular and kagome lattices, see, e.g., G. Misguich et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1098 (1998); L. Balents et al. Phys. Rev. B 65, 224412 (2002).
8. E.H. Lieb et al., Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 16, 407 (1961); I. Affleck et al., Lett. Math. Phys. 12, 57 (1986).
9. E.H. Lieb et al., Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 16, 407 (1961); I. Affleck et al., Lett. Math. Phys. 12, 57 (1986).
10. I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. B 37, 5186 (1988).
11. N. E. Bonesteel, Phys. Rev. B 40, 8954 (1989).
12. M. Oshikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1535 (2000).
13. M. B. Hastings, Phys. Rev. B 69, 104431 (2004).
14. X.G. Wen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 4, 239 (1990).
15. G. Misguich et al., Eur. Phys. J. B 26, 167 (2002).
16. D. A. Ivanov et al., Phys. Rev. B 66, 115111 (2002).
17. S. Sorella et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 257005 (2003).
18. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
19. F. Figuerido et al., Phys. Rev. B 41, 4619 (1989).
20. P.W. Leung et al., Phys. Rev. B 53, 2213 (1996).
21. M. P. Gelfand et al., Phys. Rev. B 40, 10801 (1989).
22. S. R. White et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 886 (1994).
23. S. Chakravarty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4446 (1996).
24. Though other patterns are in principle possible, our results show no evidence for other forms of dimerization.
25. G. Santoro et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3065 (1999); L. Capriotti, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 15, 1799 (2001).
26. G. Santoro et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3065 (1999); L. Capriotti, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 15, 1799 (2001).
27. N. Read and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1773 (1991); Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5, 219 (1991).
28. N. Read and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1773 (1991); Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5, 219 (1991).