Directional ordering of fluctuations in a two-dimensional compass model

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 20, 2004, Pages

  Mishra, Anup ^a   Ma, Michael ^a   Zhang, Fu Chun ^a,b   Guertler, Siegfried ^c,d   Tang, Lei Han ^c   Wan, Shaolong ^c,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c HONG KONG BAPTIST UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^d GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENTROPY; GROUND STATE; HAMILTONIANS; INSULATING MATERIALS; LATTICE CONSTANTS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PEROVSKITE; THEOREM PROVING; TRANSITION METAL COMPOUNDS;

DIRECTIONAL COUPLINGS; ENTROPY GAP; MOTT INSULATING PHASE; ORBITAL-ORBITAL INTERACTIONS;

CRYSTAL ATOMIC STRUCTURE;

EID: 19744380053     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.207201     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. K.I. Kugel and D.I. Khomskii, Sov. Phys. Usp. 25, 231 (1982).
2. Y. Tokura and N. Nagaosa, Science 288, 462 (2000).
3. M.V. Mostovoy and D. I. Khomskii, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 167201 (2004).
4. D.I. Khomskii and M.V. Mostovoy, J. Phys. A 36, 9197 (2003).
5. Z. Nussinov, M. Biskup, L. Chayes, and J. van den Brink, Europhys. Lett. 67, 990 (2004).
6. M. Biskup, L. Chayes, and Z. Nussinov, cond-mat/0309691.
7. C. Castellani, C. R. Natoli, and J. Ranninger, Phys. Rev. B 18, 4945 (1978).
8. F. Mila et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1714 (2000).
9. B. Keimer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3946 (2000).
10. G. Khaliullin and S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3950 (2000).
11. G. Khaliullin, Phys. Rev. B 64, 212405 (2001).
12. For the case of long-ranged dipole-dipole interaction, the lack of conventional order has been shown rigorously. S. J. Glass and J. D. Lawson, Phys. Lett. A 46, 234 (1973).
13. R. Peierls, Phys. Rev. 54, 918 (1938).
14. R. P. Feynman, Statistical Mechanics, Frontier in Physics Series (Benjamin, New York, 1972).
15. B. A. Berg and T. Neuhaus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 9 (1992).
16. K. Binder, Z. Phys. B 43, 119 (1981); J. Salas and A. D. Sokal, J. Stat Phys. 98, 551 (2000).
17. K. Binder, Z. Phys. B 43, 119 (1981); J. Salas and A. D. Sokal, J. Stat Phys. 98, 551 (2000).
18. A. E. Ferdinand and M.E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. 185, 832 (1969).
19. In the case of the quantum model, there is the additional complication that unlike the case of 2D, symmetry II holds only classically.