MISSH (Minimally Invasive Subanodermal Submucosal Hemorrhoidoplasty) combined with supraanal lifting - A new surgical procedure for the correction of immobile hemorrhoidal and anal prolapses with no anoderm incision. Initial results with 614 patients;Die MISSH (minimal invasive subanodermale submuköse hämorrhoidoplastie mit supraanalem lifting) - Ein neues operatives verfahren zur korrektur auch fixierter hämorrhoidal- und analprolapsformen ohne anoderminzision. Erste ergebnisse an 614 patienten

Coloproctology

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 85-95

  Burgard, Gunther Matthias ^a  

^a Lutrinaklinik   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anal lifting; Hemorrhoidectomy; Hemorrhoidoplasty; Hemorrhoids; Minimally invasive

Indexed keywords

ABSCESS; ADULT; ANUS DISEASE; ANUS PROLAPSE; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FIBROMA; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEMATOMA; HEMORRHOID; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HUMAN; IMMOBILE HEMORRHOIDAL PROLAPSE; INCONTINENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROTOMY; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SUBANODERMAL SUBMUCOSAL HEMORRHOIDOPLASTY; MOBILIZATION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RECURRENCE RISK; RECURRENT DISEASE; SEPSIS; STENOSIS; SUBMUCOSA; SURGICAL STAPLING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURING METHOD; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 19744373069     PISSN: 01742442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00053-005-5155-y     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Arnold K. Aktuelle Behandlung von Hämorrhoiden und Analprolaps. In: Junghans K, Hrsg Proktologie fürdie Praxis. Ludwigsburg: Ärzteschaft Ludwigsburg, 1983.
2. Burgard G. Minimal-invasive submuköse subanodermale Hämorrhoidektomie (MISSH). 23. Koloproktologietage, München, 1.-4.5.1997 (Vortrag).
3. Hancke E. Hemorrhoidectomy with linear cutter. Prospective study to evaluate technique, complications, and postoperative results. Coloproctology 2004;6:338-43.
4. Herold A. Die Stapler-Hämorrhoidenoperation: eine technische Revolution von genialer Einfachheit. Coloproctology 2003;4: 203-7.
5. Herold A, Kirsch JJ. Komplikationen nach Stapler-Hämorrhoidektomie. Coloproctology Sonderdruck 2001;1:8-16.
6. Herold A, Kirsch JJ, Staude G, et al. A German multicentre study on circular stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 2000;2: Suppl 1:18.
7. Herold A, Kirsch JJ, Staude G, et al. Multizentrische Erfahrungen mit der Stapler-Hämorrhoidenoperation. Coloproctology Sonderdruck 2001;1:2-7.
8. Kirsch JJ, Herold A. Komplikationen der Stapler-Hämorrhoidektomie. Coloproctology 2001;23:154-9.
9. Lambertz D. Prospektive Studie MISSH. Medizinsche Fakultät, Ulm Dissertation, vorgesehen zur Publikation 2005.
10. Law WL. Ambulatory stapled haemorrhoidectomy: a safe and feasible surgical technique. Hong Kong Med J 2003;9:103-7.
11. MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities. A meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38:687-94.
12. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355:782-5.
13. Milligan ETC, Morgan CN, Jones LE, et al. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and the operative treatment of haemorrhoids. Lancet 1937;2:1119-24.
14. Parks AG. The surgical treatment of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1956;XLIII:337-51.
15. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355:779.
16. Winkler R. Hämorrhoiden. Zur Wertung der verschiedenen chirurgischen Verfahren. Chirurg 2001;72:660-6.