Assessing two common approaches for solving models with saddle-path instabilities

Mathematics and Computers in Simulation

Volumn 69, Issue 1-2 SPEC. ISS., 2005, Pages 78-89

  Herbert, Ric D ^a   Stemp, Peter J ^b   Griffiths, William E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Computational techniques; Investment models; Saddle path instability

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECONOMICS; INVESTMENTS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PUBLIC POLICY;

COMPUTATIONAL TECHNIQUES; INVESTMENT MODELS; MODEL CALIBRATION; SADDLE-PATH INSTABILITY;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 19744373003     PISSN: 03784754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2005.02.019     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. O.J. Blanchard, and C.M. Kahn The solution of linear difference models under rational expectations Econometrica 48 1980 1305 1311
2. F. Hayashi Tobin's marginal q and average q: a neoclassical interpretation Econometrica 50 1982 213 224
3. MathWorks, http://www.mathworks.com/, 2003.
4. S. Chib, and E. Greenberg Analysis of multivariate probit models Biometrika 85 1998 347 361
5. J.M. Verbeek A Guide to Modern Econometrics 2000 John Wiley and Sons Chichester